Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » New DVD and BluRay (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
Author Topic: New DVD and BluRay
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-20-2012 02:24 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert E. Allen
It's not an HD set. But with the picture as sharp as it is (sharper than any I've ever seen in a theatre) I can see no need for replacing it.
Um, wow, that's pretty staggering.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-20-2012 02:27 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The rental discs typically have no extras. They also have forced trailers and TV commercials that cannot by skipped by pressing the chapter button; the viewer must fast-forward through them instead. The fast forward button doesn't work on those damned FBI/Interpol logos. Some rental Blu-ray discs don't even have chapter stops.
I've come across a few of those courtesy of Lovefilm (British Netflix equivalent), too. Thankfully it's not a major problem for me, because I mainly like watching arthouse and archival re-release type stuff, for which the market is so small that they generally don't bother with a separate rental version - the mail rental outfits get the same version as the retail one. But I did get this with Red State, Amelia, Hugo, J. Edgar and The Conspirator in the last year or two. And what really puts the icing on the cake is that you can't just start the trailers running, then take a shower, feed the cat, phone a friend or kill time some other way for 15 minutes or so unless you're keeping an eye on the screen, because there's no menu at the end of the trailers: the feature starts automatically.

If I was cynical I'd speculate that this is yet another 'soft power' tactic the distributors are using to persuade us to start watching stuff over the internet and abandon offline media...

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 06-20-2012 03:23 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Drop by sometime Bobby and I'll show you. Well, sadly, there's half a country between us.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-20-2012 03:34 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen plenty of good CRT-based standard definition television monitors, including expensive professional based monitors used in large market TV stations.

I have never seen any such CRT monitor fed an SD quality video signal equal or surpass the detail shown on a competently projected image from 35mm film. Nevermind any discussion comparing 5-perf 70mm or 15-perf 70mm based material.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-20-2012 04:51 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My eyesight sucks and I can see the difference between HD and not-HD. Hell, my eyesight is so bad that I can't even tell if I'm on Film-Tech right now. I hope I am.

But anyway, HD is an acquired taste for some. If you spent all of your TV/movie watching time viewing things in HD for, say 6 months and then went back and watched a DVD or VHS, you'd notice the difference and would probably prefer the HD at that point. These are the same people who don't notice the difference between a 35mm print and a 70mm print or even TV and a film print. They see a person on the screen. All that matters is that they see a person.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 06-20-2012 06:46 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well Joe, I can certainly tell the difference between 35 and 70mm 'cause in my projectionist days I ran both. 70 of course is superior. Loved those Norelco projectors. But I still think BlueRay is a ploy by the manufacturers to sell more equipment and discs.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-20-2012 08:51 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
By that inference Blu-ray is unnecessary then you must believe that any form of HDTV must be unnecessary as well.

DVD and VHS are both stuck in standard definition. They're obsolete formats. Blu-ray is not only HD, Blu-ray delivers the highest quality of pre-recorded HD video consumers can buy.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 06-20-2012 09:37 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Unnecessary for me Bobby. After a certain point it doesn't improve the enjoyment for me. It's the story that gets me or the music. I'm not a techno-geek and at this point I could die a contented man. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-21-2012 04:44 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert E. Allen
But I still think BlueRay is a ploy by the manufacturers to sell more equipment and discs.
Undoubtedly, but if we all took the line that new generations of technology were unnecessary, we'd still be listening to Edison Blue Amberol cylinders, watching dim and jerky silent films, refusing to drive "horseless carriages" like Tim Holt in The Magnificent Ambersons, etc. etc.

There will, I think, though, come a point at which the technology of home viewing will effectively have matured, and won't be able to do offer anything more that any consumer would regard as a material improvement. This has already happened in other consumer technologies. A fridge or a washing machine bought now, for example, does exactly the same job as one bought 20 years ago (except use slightly less electricity). Assume for argument's sake that in 5-10 years' time, another optical disc format comes out that offers 4K resolution. Subjectively, is anyone likely to notice any upgrade on the screen such that it'll convince them to buy yet another copy of Gone With the Wind to add to the VHS, DVD and BD copies they have already? They would have to have a very big screen, to start with.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 06-21-2012 12:08 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I see what you're saying Leo. At 80 years of age I've seen all the improvements you've mentioned and really appreciate them. But BluRay is one on which I'll pass.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-21-2012 02:51 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
There will, I think, though, come a point at which the technology of home viewing will effectively have matured, and won't be able to do offer anything more that any consumer would regard as a material improvement.
I agree, as long as the fundamental paradigm of TV viewing doesn't change.

The thing is change can happen, and probably will happen since the makers of TV monitors, computer monitors and video playback equipment want to stay in business. A lot of electronics companies would go out of business if customers only bought a new product when the old one finally broke and could not be repaired. Electronics companies have the challenge of making a product with real "must have" features rather than a bland solution in search of a problem.

quote: Leo Enticknap
Assume for argument's sake that in 5-10 years' time, another optical disc format comes out that offers 4K resolution. Subjectively, is anyone likely to notice any upgrade on the screen such that it'll convince them to buy yet another copy of Gone With the Wind to add to the VHS, DVD and BD copies they have already? They would have to have a very big screen, to start with.
A really big screen would have to be the cornerstone of such a 4K format -that is unless Apple gets into the TV manufacturing business and squeezes 4K pixel counts into a vareity of modest to large flat panel display sizes, selling 4K as Retina Display™.

A 4K video format on disc could be plausible in the long term, but highly unlikely within the next 5 years or perhaps even 10 for that matter. Look at all the legal and corporate political hell Blu-ray had to conquer in order to be introduced to the market and win an HD disc format war. Who wants to go through all that crap again?

In order for a new optical disc storage format to succeed Blu-ray it would need to conquer a few challenges. Not many computers have Blu-ray disc writing capability. Blank DVD-R discs are cheap, but many people have shifted to using large capacity external hard disc drives for huge amounts of data and flash memory sticks and cards for smaller amounts. I have my entire CD collection duped in LPCM WAV format on just one 1TB hard disc. A new optical disc format would need capacity on the order of hundreds of gigabytes or even in the terabytes to have a chance. Not only that, the disc would need better I/O performance than Blu-ray.

Internet streaming would be the other alternative where 4K could be delivered. But the Internet in the United States on average is painfully slow. There are only scant few places where one can download video at speeds fast enough to sustain Blu-ray quality bandwidth. 4K video would quadruple that bandwidth load.

Blu-ray is here to stay for a long time. Those who haven't upgraded already will end up doing so when their old DVD player finally breaks. DVD-only movie disc players are disappearing from store shelves. They can keep playing old DVDs on those machines. But some new Blu-ray players arriving on store shelves are lacking the backward compatible outputs that would allow them to work on old standard definition TV sets.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-21-2012 05:10 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Agreed completely, and the common form factor is probably one of the things that'll sustain BD (i.e. that one player will play CDs, DVDs and BDs). The only thing that makes me wonder if a 4K optical disc format is coming down the pipe is that 4K now seems to be the standard the studios have settled on for digital studio origination, post production and scanning archival assets. So at the end of the production or restoration process, they're ending up with a 4K master digital element. So if a 4K consumer format did come out, they'd have an avalanche of content all ready to go.

And as you say, Internet bandwidth is strangling online delivery. I couldn't give you figures, but I strongly suspect that the vast majority of household broadband connections in the developed world offer 4-6mbps at most - barely enough for DVD equivalent to be streamed online. The only exceptions I know of are France and Japan, where they've spent an assload of taxpayers' cash fibre-opticing up pretty much the entire countries. But they're small countries with most of their populations concentrated in an even smaller area still: I can't see that happening in the US, Canada, Australia, Russia, India etc. anytime soon.

So the content providers can't force consumers to an online only distribution model without cutting off probably around 80% of their worldwide market, meaning that offline carriers (optical discs, in other words) are going to be around for some time yet.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-21-2012 07:16 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You want to create a new format that'll take the world by storm? OK, here's my simple list of features it needs to have:

1. Picture and sound as good as Blu-Ray (no need for anything better)

2. It's guaranteed to work in all players

3. It's guaranteed to start playing the feature film (or for TV shows or multi-item disks, give you the main menu) within 5 seconds after you close the tray. And without FBI warnings.

If you introduced this product even Robert Allen might buy it! [Big Grin]

Seriously though, the next thing to replace BR is probably going to be an online thing. I have been predicting for a long time that the whole notion of "a spinning disk" containing content is going to be an antiquated idea. The way storage costs are dropping, that'll happen by the end of this decade, I'll bet.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-21-2012 07:47 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Internet speeds will need to get a lot faster for online streaming services to make physical media like Blu-ray seem antiquated. I just don't expect that to happen anytime soon.

IMHO, the primary thing holding back Internet speeds is smart phones. Various telecom giants like AT&T and Verizon are spending big sums of money upgrading their mobile phone networks and working at a snail's pace on upgrading residential Internet connections. Worse yet, they've been placing bandwidth caps on those residential Internet connections.

An Internet connection needs to deliver at least 30 million bits per second sustained in download speeds to offer HD video quality that would be comparable at all to Blu-ray. In order for the connection to outdo Blu-ray at the top end peak levels it would need to deliver 50 million bit per second speeds.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-21-2012 08:23 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There should be a cable channel that shows nothing but FBI warnings 24/7. It definitely deters me from pirating, otherwise I'd pirate anything and everything. Good thing that upcoming Blu-rays will have UNSKIPPABLE 5 or 10 second FBI piracy warnings. That will probably stop piracy altogether. The movie industry hires only idiots, I swear.

My cable internet is somewhere around 20 megabits per second. Comcast increased it without my permission (or charging me). I'm sure they'll slow it back down in a year and make me pay more if I want to keep the higher speed.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.