Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » OPPO Digital Shutting Down (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: OPPO Digital Shutting Down
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-10-2018 01:31 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the reasons why RS232 is not going anywhere is that the logical replacement (IP-based control) requires configuration on both ends (IP address, netmask, default route). Serial is the simplest way to configure this. Also, it can be run for hundreds of feet with good cable, requires only three conductors for minimal functionality, and does not require additional gear (e.g. switches, routers, etc.) to function.

It is also both backwards- and forwards-compatible, which is important for industrial control hardware that generally has a long-ish lifespan. And it can be used over IP with a simple terminal server.

Agreed that the "average consumer" doesn't care about any of this in 2018. Pretty much no one is buying modems, serial mice, or serial printers now.

 |  IP: Logged

Warren Smyth
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 158
From: Auckland ,New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 04-11-2018 10:27 AM      Profile for Warren Smyth   Email Warren Smyth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is sad news indeed that Oppo players are facing extinction. I have a UDP-203 and am tempted to buy another for the future.

Their DVD players have been excellent as well. Oppo have produce quality products which have met my needs by providing analog outputs because I still use glass bottles that glow in the dark.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 04-11-2018 12:16 PM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the home custom instal world RS-232 is still used rather extensively, for control and mostly for reasons Scott had said above.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 04-11-2018 11:56 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
I read yesterday somewhere (can't remember where) that in the next couple of years, Apple/iTunes wants to be out of the download business and just do streaming only.
I read that also, but then I read that it was fake news or a severe misinterpretation of what Apple is planning. The part that makes sense is that overall, in the U.S., downloads are only 15.7% of the music business (in dollars) and streaming is now 66.7%. But there's much greater margin in downloads than there is in the Apple Music subscription service and the incremental costs to operate the download service are probably small because Apple has to store all that music anyway.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-12-2018 06:45 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am really not interested in streaming music services, but I can see the economic justification for them. Why would I buy records or CDs for $10-20 each when I could subscribe to a service that would let me listen to effectively anything that I want to hear for $10/month (or thereabouts)? For the same expenditure, it would take years to accumulate a library of recordings that would cover all of my interests.

For me, the difference is largely related to quality (which is fixable, as bandwidth and storage costs go down) and the fact that I prefer to own recorded music rather than rent it (which is not fixable). There is also the risk that a favorite recording may become unavailable due to rights issues, whereas I can own my personal collection for forever. But I can totally see how the average consumer would prefer the convenience of not having to buy and store physical items and full access to a larger music library than most people could ever afford to own.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 04-12-2018 04:17 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The primary reason why I keep my Spotify subscription around is because it allows me to discover some new music from time to time, quite to the difference of the average radio station, which happens to only play the 13-in-a-dozen junk the record studios want to peddle.

The problem with on-line subscriptions is indeed that you never really own it and once somebody pulls a license somewhere, it's gone. So, I still tend to buy the stuff I want to keep.

The problem though is, that this "buy to own" model is fading away. How can you own a copy of a movie, when within now and 5 years, there is no more physical media available for sale and the digital copy you own is only playable using someone else's DRM servers, who might just vanish any time?

Maybe, for sake of consumer rights and preservation, there should always be the possibility to legally own a copy that doesn't expire...

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 04-28-2018 06:15 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have literally thousands of movies and other video programs in every past and present format, and still get joy in buying new ones. I get no such joy from "digital"- the quality still leaves much to be desired, and I don't like the idea of someone being able to take it off-line for any reason.

The present consumer electronics market is going to crap however, and Oppo was one of the last companies I trusted. I'm glad I got their UDP-203 last year (and a 75-inch LG 3D display, which is now discontinued), hopefully they'll last a long time if there won't be any better replacements out. I'll keep buying media, but if the industry goes to digital-only then I just won't buy new movies anymore.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 04-28-2018 08:26 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jesse Skeen
I have literally thousands of movies and other video programs in every past and present format, and still get joy in buying new ones. I get no such joy from "digital"- the quality still leaves much to be desired, and I don't like the idea of someone being able to take it off-line for any reason.
I guess with "digital" you're referring to streaming and download services?

Keep in mind that much of the physical digital media you buy those days is pretty much a farce too, since it often needs active DRM to be able to be played. This is also true for almost all 4K content out there. Somebody could remotely pull the license and you're stuck with unplayable content.

I thoroughly encourage paying content creators for their work, but on the flip-side, we as consumers of this content are quickly losing our rights to actually own a COPY of those works and do whatever we want with it (within the boundaries of creator's copyrights).

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 05-09-2018 02:45 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marcel Birgelen
Keep in mind that much of the physical digital media you buy those days is pretty much a farce too, since it often needs active DRM to be able to be played. This is also true for almost all 4K content out there. Somebody could remotely pull the license and you're stuck with unplayable content.
I'm not sure that this is accurate. I've never heard of such a requirement. What is your basis for this?

I have a 4K UHD player that hasn't been connected to the Internet since the day I brought it home and updated it three months ago, and it plays everything I put into it just fine, including new releases.

I'd be curious to look into this further, so if you can provide me with some references to look at, I'd be grateful!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-09-2018 05:59 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Same here.

BTW...update on Oppo. We can no longer supply the rackmount for the UDP-203/BDP-103 though they are still showing it for retail so they are down to the last batch (not a huge deal, they fit on a Mid-Atlantic U2 shelf (or equivalent) without issue, just not quite as finished. We did place another multi-unit order without issue for the UDP-203.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2018 07:33 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, it's absolutely true. It's optional, but nearly all studio manufactured discs have encryption keys on them that sort out the region code and allow playback only on devices that are made by manufactures that make licensed players (that is to say, players whose encoders/decoders are licensed thru MPEG/Dolby/and the original standard consortiums.) The system is known as CSS for DVDs, and AACS for bluray. The license also contains DRM provisions that allow the disc manufacturer to encode what they will allow as far as copy protection onto the disc. I've never heard of a player that had its licensed "remotely revoked", though, I'm not sure that is possible even for a networked machine. I HAVE heard of discs that would not play. Sony Home Video went through this some years back when some of its discs had bad CSS coding that would not allow them to handshake with the player.

Those who recall the Circuit City "DIVX" format remember an example of playback rights-negation based on a form of player/disc DRM encoding.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 05-10-2018 03:38 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is possible for new discs to revoke playout keys for equipment upon loading, so, that is technically possible to happen even if the player is never connected to the internet. Discs can carry an equipment blacklist.

However, I think they never did it, and it is not very likely to happen, but technically, it is possible. Also, this doesn't revoke content keys, but equipment keys, so, the disc is still mine and can be played back on other equipment. Not that this would make me happy in case my player would actually have been tilted.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 05-11-2018 04:06 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
First off all, anything you ever DOWNLOADED from services offered by the likes of Apple, Microsoft or Amazon which was not explicitly labeled as DRM free, requires an active form of DRM, at the very least if you're going to transfer it from one device to the other. This means: The issuer of the DRM licenses has to actively provide new keys for the new device or otherwise the content will become technically unplayable. If this service went belly up, or they refuse you to issue new keys for whatever reason, you're essentially out of luck.

Any media using Enhanced AACS 2.0 (primarily UHD and HDR content), needs an active Internet connection for the first playback on any device, to load the title key. You won't be able to play the disc on the device, unless this key exchange has happened. If the disc or device is blacklisted or if the license server has gone haywire: No content for you.

The Basic version of AACS 2.0 works without an internet connection. That doesn't mean it's entirely safe though, since several types of licenses can technically still be revoked "off-line". (See Carsten's post.)

Then there is other entertainment that used to be delivered in the form of discs or even "cartridges": Computer games. There is almost no modern game that will work properly without an active Internet connection and this often doesn't just apply to the multi-player part of the game. Even single-player games often are not playable without a constant connection to the mothership.

Off course, there are many tools available to remove DRM from files and media. Technically speaking, those tools are illegal in the U.S. though, even if you only use them to recover the content you actually paid for.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 05-15-2018 01:27 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
BTW...update on Oppo. We can no longer supply the rackmount for the UDP-203/BDP-103 though they are still showing it for retail so they are down to the last batch (not a huge deal, they fit on a Mid-Atlantic U2 shelf (or equivalent) without issue, just not quite as finished. We did place another multi-unit order without issue for the UDP-203.
I'm still deliberating on whether to take a chance and purchase a -203 before they're gone (the opportunity to get the best player that was made for the format) and not taking the risk of buying into a dead product that won't be supported any longer than the company deems necessary to not cause a firestorm.

At this point, I am watching their refurb page, hoping for one to pop up, but I'm not holding my breath.

quote: Marcel Birgelen
Any media using Enhanced AACS 2.0 (primarily UHD and HDR content), needs an active Internet connection for the first playback on any device, to load the title key. You won't be able to play the disc on the device, unless this key exchange has happened. If the disc or device is blacklisted or if the license server has gone haywire: No content for you.
I do seem to recall hearing about AACS 2.0 Enhanced being a possibility, but after some outcry, basically every studio said that they wouldn't use it (or at least that's how I remember it possibly going).

That seems to have borne out, as I could not find any movies identified as having AACS 2.0 Enhanced protection.

That's not to say that someone couldn't do it at some point in the future, but given that there are hundreds of UHD titles after more than two years of the format's introduction, and nothing has used it yet (and there are no studio holdouts for the format), I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it isn't going to be used.

Studios couldn't figure out how to use the online functionality of Blu-ray to deliver value-added content, so it's difficult to imagine them wanting to support an infrastructure that has the potential to render purchased products unusable. The backlash in the event of problems would be catastrophic in what likely amounts to be a small segment of their business.

Active DRM is one of the three main reasons why I do not purchase streaming content that I wish to keep (the first and second being video and audio quality). I think I've purchased two streaming movies, because they weren't available to rent, I wanted to watch them right then, and they were cheap. Aside from that, streaming is best for TV shows and for movies I wouldn't otherwise have taken the time to get from Netflix DVD-by-mail or purchase on disc.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-15-2018 03:30 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They are all selling with a 2-year warranty and I believe Oppo as a company will exist, just not a manufacturer, at least not for Blu-rays. My guess is that they'll have software support for at least the 2-year warranty period.

I wouldn't hesitate long, they are definitely winding down now as we're seeing things become unavailable.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.