Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Did I see D-Cinema done wrong? (Page 6)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Did I see D-Cinema done wrong?
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 04-22-2005 03:49 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oops, so sorry. Bevan caught it. Yes the JVC stuff was D-ILA. Post edited. That's what I get for writing when dead tired. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Orman
Film Handler

Posts: 24
From: Sompting, Lancing, UK
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-23-2005 07:00 AM      Profile for Kevin Orman   Email Kevin Orman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
They could try to sell it that way, but anyone with even a pedestrian knowledge of film presentation and computer technology knows the "will always be perfect" claim is just not true.
Sorry Bobby, I realise I probably was not too clear, I was being a little ironic when I said "surely it's supposed to be perfect all the time".
Yes, I agree fully with you that digital cinema systems are unlikely to be any more reliable than any other electronic/digital system. I fear that in future we may be faced with the prospect of re-boots during a show which will be considered 'acceptable' by technical support people. Periodic failure is considered 'normal' by most in the computing/IT world.
I don't need convincing at all, we have been running film as our business since 1996 and to date have a zero failure rate, so of course I am wondering in which way digital will be 'better'!?

For the record my own position on digital is that this is way too early as the technology is not mature or stable (both in terms of actual operation and development). I do sincerely believe that after ALL factors are taken into account (including the cost of junking perfectly good 35mm equipment)that digital will be a less reliable and more expensive solution than film - remember I am talking about OVERALL cost.
There are also some potentially serious issues relating to control over what is screened with the possibility that some film companies will take the opportunity to dictate showtimes etc.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.