|
Author
|
Topic: dforced?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 04-12-2009 05:20 PM
I saw two films during the past week in a theatre. One of them was MONSTERS VS ALIENS in IMAX 3-D and the other one was KNOWING which was not too bad. The 35mm image on the scheen was nice and sharp as usual at the Kapolei 16 and for the very first time, I had noticed the difference between a good theatrical film presentation and movies on HDTV at home. The 3-D digital IMAX image looked like my Samsung 1080p HDTV picture with a nice contrast and sharpness without the 3-D but the 35mm film presentation of KNOWING although very nice was not even as good as the up convertted to 1080p images from standard definition DVDs I have seen at home on my new HDTV. It is not my intention to be critical of the 35m format at this time but after enjoying the awesome picture quality I had experienced when I saw films like DOUBT, YESMAN, SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE, MARLEY & ME on Blu Ray and many Up Converted DVD image in HD, I now prefer digital over film. Up until I got HDTV, I was very happy with 35mm film because it had the edge over the standard television image I was watching at home from DVDs
When a few early adapters switched over to digital still photography shortly after it was introduced, I resisted as long as I could and stuck to film but when I saw the advantage digital photography offered, I converted. When a person lilke myself who has been making a nice living selling professional images to the public can see the the difference between a good theatrical film presentation and prefer watching the same same thing on a quality HDTV in a home in Blu Ray, I feel the future of motion picture exhibition is digital.
-Claude
| IP: Logged
|
|