|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What 2k digital projector?
|
James B Gardiner
Film Handler
Posts: 91
From: North Altona, Victoria, Ausrtalia
Registered: Feb 2009
|
posted 04-30-2009 07:40 AM
Well, if your not DCI, there are quite a few eCinema solutions. I am involved in the development of the eCinema box on www.d-cinema.com.au It is the technology emerging Pictures use for its eCinema network. It supports a proprietary DRM system which Emerging is using for its content and a lot of new Classics they will now be distributing. Reputry (Spell) showing old films, is doing a come back. Especially as the eCinema costs, far less then DCI all round.
If you have a lot of local generated content, the use of eCinema type technologies is great. These devices are designed to work in with automation and be seamless with modern cinema practices. Can have content distributed to them over internet links. etc.
They support common codecs like MPEG2-HD, H.264, WMV. All at 1920x1080 (Not quite 2k 92% of the resolution.) Ad some of these new 1920x1080 eCinema projectors, you can get great results at 1/8th the cost of a DCI system.
Don't get me wrong, DCI is the best and what the big guys should be doing, but in some cases, eCinema makes business sense, and it sounds like it does in your part of the world.
I am one of the developers of the CineX product, and not to blow my own horn, but it is known as the best of breed products in the eCinema market place. Do consider it.
James
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 04-30-2009 11:35 AM
Well, since I agree with this projector reviewer's comments, I'll save time and quote him. Remember how I always say we have to be careful about what we say when it comes to image (or sound) experience, as we all hear and see different things, and we may not be in the average "90%" of the population (or we may be, we have to find out). Some people are even tetrachromats and have 4 color receptors in their eyes, instead of the "normal" 3 or the 2 a significant number of people carry in their eyes (colorblinds).
quote: One study suggested that 2–3% of the world's women might have the kind of fourth cone that lies between the standard red and green cones, giving, theoretically, a significant increase in color differentiation.[4] Another study suggests that as many as 50% of women and 8% of men may have four photopigments
So, anyway:
quote: Some people are never bothered by DLP rainbows. I am one of them. I can watch a DLP projector all day long and never see visual distractions or develop eyestrain or headache. This is somewhat of a handicap for a projector reviewer. In years past I'd give a particular DLP projector a glowing review, only to get a flurry of email saying, "Evan, are you nuts? There are rainbows everywhere."
Individual sensitivity to rainbow artifacts can vary greatly. In addition to folks like me who don't see them at all, there are those who notice them from time to time, but don't find them to be much of a nuisance. On the other hand, there are some who are so bothered by them that they cannot watch a DLP projector under any circumstances.
In today's market, most business class DLP projectors have what is known as a 2x speed wheel. Many units designed for home entertainment have 2x wheels also. It is the 2x wheel that causes the most problems.
Texas Instruments and the manufacturers of DLP projectors have increased the speed of the sequential color updating in order to reduce the percentage of the population that is affected by rainbow artifacts. By using a different wheel design that uses two sets of red, green, and blue filters instead of one, the manufacturers are able to double the refresh rate on the screen. This wheel design is referred to as a 4x wheel, and it substantially reduces the number of people who are affected by rainbows. Our newest staff reviewer, Bill Livolsi, has trouble watching 2x DLP projectors for any length of time. But he has no problem at all with the 4x models.
I'm the type that can see rainbows on 2x and 4x color wheels easily when I move my eyes rapidly from, say, one corner to the opposite and there is white on the image. If I just stare at the screen from a distance, I can never see them.
Today's color wheels are usually 7 segment and they are 6X speed (10,800 RPM). The refresh rate is tuned to the wheel frequency and thus, I don't think that motion on the screen has any effect on rainbows if TI engineers knew what they were doing at all, which I believe they did.
Fast motion may help to show rainbows as with fast moving objects you are usually inclined to move your eyes rapidly to follow these objects as they move across the screen, but nothing else.
On the other side, if single DLP chip projectors were so bad as to be unuseable, I don't think they would've been selling all these years and new models continue to show up even this year. They would've been scrapped and 3 LCD taken over.
So perhaps is not such a big issue for a lot of people.
Except on Transformers. On that movie, your eyes will be moving all over the screen trying to follow whatever the hell is going on. It's bound to hit a rainbow on a white, high-contrast area for just about anyone ![[Wink]](wink.gif) [ 04-30-2009, 02:57 PM: Message edited by: Julio Roberto ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 04-30-2009 12:29 PM
Well, quoting myself:
quote: Julio Roberto The alternatives either don't exist or are far more expensive or have other drawbacks.
And, as I said, the first choice I recommended was a $10k machine that didn't use color wheels and should do a fair job for the task. Given the constrains of the situation. I would also usually recommend using two stacked lcd small projectors over an expensive, single DLP one.
But yeah, before you commit to an expensive color wheel solution, make sure you test it under the closest conditions to your final usage scenario as you can (i.e. a large screen), sitting at close and also at medium distances from it, preferably displaying high contrast material rich in whites (i.e. a black and white movie) and moving your eyes around a lot.
Get 5 or 10 people and tell them to do the same. If you all can sit through the entire movie and not notice rainbows, well, the choice is yours.
E-cinema projectors based on single DLP chips with color wheels abound everywhere in the world, from Australia to China to India, so they must work well enough for enough people.
I guess.
He could also get a pair of these Epsons 6100 (no color wheel) at under $2000 each, put them together and get away with it on a small screen (up to 5m or so).
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?oid=63077379
If needed, you can use a high gain screen. They are in vogue across the USA with digital projectors for 3-D, so they must be OK to use
Don't worry about it. Figure anywhere from $5000 for a projection solution up all they way to $95.000, depending on the size of your auditorium and the quality level you are looking for (in resolution and brightness).
Once you have the films and the money, come back and we'll figure out which thing is the best buy at that point. Just don't forget you'll still need e-cinema servers, perhaps blu-ray or digital tape players, amplifiers, equalizers/crossovers, speakers, lights automation, screen, sound insulation treatments, seats, etc, etc. [ 04-30-2009, 03:10 PM: Message edited by: Julio Roberto ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 05-01-2009 07:49 AM
Stacking in digital projectors is a known and proven art for many years. Not dissimilar from multi-slide projection multimedia shows.
Once again, don't worry about the technical aspects until later. They won't be an unsurmauntable issue even if they end up becoming a problem or a nuisance.
So the short answer is: most of the time, stacking is not a problem compared to single projection. With single projection, everynow and then, depending on the projector and the installation conditions, you may have to adjust focus, zoom, etc (say once a month). Just like with 35mm or even DCI (to a much lesser extend), sometimes the heating/cooling cycles and fan vibrations end up throwing something ever so slightly out of aligment.
A small correction and you are good to go for many more weeks/months.
This is virtually the same for single or stacked projection, like Imax etc.
More expensive projectors, designed for fixed installations where the ceiling is very unaccesible, i.e., present very little adjustment drifts to begin with and allow all parameters to be corrected from a remote control unit (i.e. a computer hooked to the serial port). Focus/zoom/lens centering/color etc can then be adjusted without touching the system. Some projectors even have video cameras and they auto adjust and auto align for multiple projectors (even more than two) working together in perfect "sync".
As I said, worry about the technical stuff later. The more money you have, the fewer problems and best performance you'll get. But if you can't make the budget, then there is no point and you will have to live with pulling a ladder in the middle of the auditorium once a month to re-adjust cheap, non-remote controllable, non-fixed installation designed projectors.
Some projectors, i.e., have loud fans and they can not really be easily used in the middle of a quiet theater w/o some afterthought. Etc.
Just factor as much money as you can for projection and then you can see what options you have. After about $60.000, you should be ok and trouble free for a small theater. Starting at about $10.000, you could survive. Below that, they'll be some compromises you'll have to make.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|