Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Do high-frequency speakers deteriorate over time? Or is it just my ears? (Page 6)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Do high-frequency speakers deteriorate over time? Or is it just my ears?
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-23-2014 08:12 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, the picture right below your question is.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-23-2014 08:39 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bob Ezra
Mike- what model QSC screen speakers did you get and do you hear an improvement in dialogue?
Yes, definitely a huge improvement. Plus the bass and directionality is improved with the baffle wall added. I love that we can play it nice and loud and people don't complain.

 |  IP: Logged

Bob Ezra
Film Handler

Posts: 75
From: Carbondale, CO, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-23-2014 09:57 PM      Profile for Bob Ezra   Email Bob Ezra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike

size of your room and # of seats?

thanks

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-23-2014 10:37 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
35' wide, about 100 feet long and has 194 seats (44 of which are in the balcony).

Mark - there are 12 surrounds (2 in the balcony) and they are the QSC wedge shaped ones.

To be clear - the picture just below Bob's question is my theater and the one below that is the Hyart in Lovell, WY.

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 03-23-2014 11:41 PM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That baffle wall has me thoroughly aroused. Glad to hear it made a big difference

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 03-24-2014 03:37 AM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Got me aroused too. Agreed more theaters need to be doing this. Cheer Mike and all others who made the right choice.

 |  IP: Logged

Bob Ezra
Film Handler

Posts: 75
From: Carbondale, CO, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-24-2014 08:11 AM      Profile for Bob Ezra   Email Bob Ezra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
QSC 322XC ... anyone?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-24-2014 08:45 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't comment on its sound since I have not worked with it specfically (SC-322). The LF box is the same as their 400 series so it is well made, tuned...etc. The drivers on the LF-3215 are lower power and are clearly used as a low cost alternative to their more powerful drivers used in the LF-4215). The odds that the T-S parameters are identical between the two drivers are very slim so one should not expect the same response between the two (you can't get something for nothing). The HF section is the same as the 400 series HF so you are getting a similar response there. The passive crossover in this day and age should be avoided on design principles...more often than not they lead to driver failure if the system is driven hard.

So, if are interested in obtaining a well made speaker that will work without bi-amping so long as it is operated with the specifications of the speaker (300-watts...which isn't very much at all), I have every confidence that QSC made a good quality product. Is your targeted room suited to this speaker? You haven't provided enough information to comment. It better be a smallish room though. Is it going to be as good as the SC-422 or the SC-423 (or the SC-424)...not a chance. QSC's 3-way and 4-way speakers are where they really shine. It seems that they started with the SC-423 and then modified that design down to create the smaller cousins.

Sound wise, someone else has to comment on this model, including how well it tunes up in a typical cinema. I have not worked with it.

 |  IP: Logged

Bob Ezra
Film Handler

Posts: 75
From: Carbondale, CO, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-24-2014 11:09 AM      Profile for Bob Ezra   Email Bob Ezra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve

Thanks for that.

Room is 24x70 (1680 sq ft)- baffle wall behind screen.

Currently JBL 4638 Lf with 2385A horn - Qsc 1400 amps.

Not looking for huge sound but better dialogue intelligibility

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-25-2014 09:49 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My suspicion is that turning is where your problem mostly lies (or bad room acoustics). The 4638 is a decent LF system. It is the low-powered version of the 4648...same box, lower powered drivers...if it has the "TH" in the name, then the crossover is cut into the box.

The 2385 is actually a decent choice for your room since it is a 60x40...you have a long-narrow theatre and the 60x40 horn will keep the energy off of your walls better than a traditional 90x40 horn. The downside is that it is the small format horn and it will have poor pattern control below 1000Hz. I was never a big fan of the 2380 series. The 2360 series did MUCH better but they also were 3-feet deep.

Before throwing money at a new speaker...I would really look at the tuning, crossover and room acoustics. If you are going to buy new speakers and dialog is an issue...consider saving a bit more and look into the QSC SC-423 ...they are 3-ways (good ones) and will be horn loaded down to the 300Hz range. You'll need to, at least, bi-amp them but you'll have a chance of improving the dialog with this speaker. Going to another passive speaker with a wider dispersion is likely to make things worse. In fact, if QSC made their MF/HF in a 60x40 version, I'd recommend that. Note too, you could save money by reusing your LF section since that is NOT where your problem is.

Note, at a 70-foot room, you should have over 650-watts available to the LF section alone (disqualifies the SC-322 and all SC-300 series immediately).

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-25-2014 12:00 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bob,

Before you do anything you should get your self new amplifiers. If not DCA's then at least the RMX's. The 1400's are reliable but a very old design with old semi's and old IC's with poor slew rates. You would be amazed at the increase in definition as well as high frequency extension when you install new amplifiers. For many of my customers just installing new amplifiers was the equivalent of rolling up a window shade that was seemingly in front of the screen. You also won't really be taking advantage of any new speaker's full performance with those old 1400's. And for D-Cinema you really should have more headroom anyway.

I have installed four sets of the 322's that I recall so far and in rooms about your length but narrower. They work well however, the dialog on the three way systems is much better IMHO, even the dialog intelligibility of the little SC-2150 which I have installed a few sets of in small rooms would blow you away. When I opened the first SC-322 upper section and saw how small they are I shook my head thinking these will never work.... But they turned out to be awesome.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Bob Ezra
Film Handler

Posts: 75
From: Carbondale, CO, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-25-2014 11:07 PM      Profile for Bob Ezra   Email Bob Ezra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve-
The room has been tuned by a highly qualified guy and acoustics are a problem.

I am in the process of ordering acoustic panels for the rear wall, hoping for an improvement.

Your analysis of my speakers was interesting and helpful.

Mark-
thanks too for your input

 |  IP: Logged

Jarod Reddig
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 513
From: Hays, Ks
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 03-27-2014 08:34 PM      Profile for Jarod Reddig   Email Jarod Reddig   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Do you have any pics of the room?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.