|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Blu-Ray player blacking out every 20 min
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-05-2013 02:09 PM
That is presumably another reason why Denon's site requires you to enter the serial number of the actual player before it'll let you download a firmware for offline updating (to prevent you installing the wrong one, either accidentally or in an attempt to region hack it).
In my case, online updating would be impossible without very major hassles. Even if I got the player within range of an ethernet socket, the network in the university in which it is situated requires non-standard IP, DNS and subnet settings, plus the mac address of the client to be pre-authorised by IT Services before a connection is possible. At least one of those settings can't be changed in the player's config options (I forget which one, but I did investigate before updating offline), meaning that the only way I'd be able to update it online would be to remove it from the rack and take it home.
I guess in Randy's case it depends on (a) whether it can be brought within easy range of an ethernet socket, (b) whether a connection to the Internet can be established without changing settings that the player doesn't let you change, and (c) if it's possible, and if so how easy it is to download the firmware for offline burning.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-05-2013 10:51 PM
Hmmm... I might be able to get onto the Science Consortium's WiFi from the booth. I know the password. (Permission to use it.) If the radio reaches that far, it might do the trick.
About quality, I'm a "9." One should try to do as well as he can but not to the point of killing himself. Unless you are in a mission-critical situation like a screening room, the utility of taking extraordinary measures isn't worth the trouble and expense. Once you get above a certain level, the gain in quality becomes small but the costs become greater. It's often better just to say, "Good enough." (That assumes you are not just copping out because you're too lazy to fix things right.)
For customers, most would probably rate a "5" as good enough. Just to satisfy my own curiosity, I have talked to people and pointed out things that, to me, are glaringly obvious but, to them would go unnoticed unless they are spelled out. About a third of those people still can't see the problem even after it is pointed out.
So, going half way between those numbers, I figure a "7" is good enough.
In my opinion, the difference between 4:4:4 sampling and 4:2:2 is like trying to discern a 1dB gain change in a sound system. It's something you can see if you are looking for it but, otherwise, will probably go unnoticed.
Making that small of a change in order to prevent the picture dropping out is worth the sacrifice.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|