Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » New THX Trailer - Eclipse (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: New THX Trailer - Eclipse
Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 04-02-2015 06:04 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess the simplest way to avoid trailer abuse for Dolby Atmos is to simply only publish those DCPs with an Atmos soundtrack and an entirely silent 7.1 PCM track?

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 04-02-2015 01:15 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Monohan
To bad Dolby does not do any advertising these days about what theatres have the Dolby Atmos system.
Cineplex has(had) made some effort in advertising Dolby Atmos when it first came out and they bundled it in with their AVX brand which IMHO was the wrong thing to do. There simply is way too many formats and options, Cineplex just recently now offers films playing UltaAVX in 3D with Dolby Atmos and D-Box all in one individual auditorium, that is why branding overkill. Cineplex had in the past all sorts of different advertisements at the local theater including Dolby Atmos banners and Dolby Atmos standees, but the Dolby Atmos brand name was always over shadowed by the UltraAVX name.

Dolby Atmos IMO needs to simply separate itself from everything else in the marketplace so that when someone watch a film that has a Dolby Atmos soundtrack they simply just get the Dolby Atmos message experience. I am more than certain that Dolby Cinema will require owners to have to follow strict branding guidelines.

I have said in the past that Dolby Atmos will go the route of Dolby EX or Dolby 7.1 in that nobody really cares. I am skeptical in that 99% of the general movie going public really have no idea what Atmos is. I have never ever met a person who knows that IMAX using dual projectors just like I have never met a person who knows that Atmos using overhead speakers and forget about them knowing what object based audio means. I have however met more than a few people who know what AVX means.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 04-02-2015 02:28 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
I have never ever met a person who knows that IMAX using dual projectors
The point is not to teach people how a system works but to associate a great experience with that.

THX "sounds great and the seats shake". That's it. There's nothing else your customer needs to know.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Monohan
Master Film Handler

Posts: 379
From: San Francisco CA USA
Registered: May 2014


 - posted 04-02-2015 09:51 PM      Profile for Terry Monohan   Email Terry Monohan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Terry Lynn**Thanks for your note about some of the theatres in Canada and Dolby Atmos. You would think with Dolby having It's main office and even expanding soon in SF they would have some great signage and advertising in the 3 theatres that they have Atmos playing in. We are all waiting to the rumors one cinema soon in SF will have Dolby Vision put in? The place to put this in as a demo and open to the public is the single screen Vogue Theatre in San Francisco. Remodel the place and put in Dolby Vision and advertise It please. I think Dolby Atmos will catch on with the public the more theatres have It installed and they plug It. Let's see the studios put the Dolby Atmos logo on the movie ads/posters with a *IN SELECT THEATRES.

 |  IP: Logged

Harold Hallikainen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 906
From: Denver, CO, USA
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 04-02-2015 10:20 PM      Profile for Harold Hallikainen   Author's Homepage   Email Harold Hallikainen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
I have however met more than a few people who know what AVX means.
That's Aerovox, right? I remember capacitors made by them.

Harold

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 04-03-2015 10:26 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
The point is not to teach people how a system works but to associate a great experience with that.

THX "sounds great and the seats shake". That's it. There's nothing else your customer needs to know.

There is nothing wrong with teaching people how things work, THX Moo effectively showed off the surrounds and what is going on inside a movie theater, Dolby 7.1 Surround was pretty good with the "all around you" at the end and IMAX used to thoroughly explain the IMAX system before they switched to digital DMR.

But you are right, a good experience and to associate that experience with a brand is smart, but Dolby Atmos has way too much sub branding going on with the PLF locations.

quote: Terry Monohan
We are all waiting to the rumors one cinema soon in SF will have Dolby Vision put in? The place to put this in as a demo and open to the public is the single screen Vogue Theatre in San Francisco. Remodel the place and put in Dolby Vision and advertise It please.
IMO, Dolby needs to stick to what they do best and what they are best known for and that is sound. The whole Dolby Cinema I don't think is going to work. They need to separate themselves from everything else you just see Dolby or Dolby Atmos as the branding.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 04-03-2015 05:33 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
of course there's nothing wrong. What I meant is that they should associate the brand with the experience not necessarily with the knowledge of how the system works.

The Atmos 'amaze', which is my favourite, does that and that's perfectly fine of course.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 04-03-2015 06:38 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
...not necessarily with the knowledge of how the system works.
This goes back to my carbon arc days at the drive-in, and later on, with indoor operations:

Our booth was ground level with the rest of the building and the entrance door was just right there.

I would be sitting in an easy chair between changeovers to watch the film when other duties were accomplished.

Patrons would walk by and see the machinery through the door and ask me why of the two machines.

I, then proceed to tell them, in great detail and showing them exactly what goes on, the technique of doing reel changeovers with the cue marks on the screen.

I've had some returned patrons tell me that ever since I showed them this procedure, that it has ruined their moviegoing experience since they now see and wait for the cue marks to appear.

And to this day, the ones that knew me during this era have told me that they still look for cue marks.

And, it's funny they ask why they don't see any more cue marks anymore and I reply back that they're experiencing a digital movie - no longer is film being used.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Connor Wilson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 190
From: Sterling, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 04-03-2015 10:09 PM      Profile for Connor Wilson   Email Connor Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just watched it on YouTube.

Let's go back to the beginning. If you collect older CDs, you might be familiar with a trio of letters on the back of the jewel case. The first letter was the tech used to record sound, the second being the method it was mixed in, and finally the last is for the mastering. On a CD you may get a couple of A's for Analog or a couple of D's for Digital. Some cases, usually with contemporary classical recordings, you'd get D's all across the board. Let's apply this to the Deep Note.

In the 80's, it was AAA for optical and magnetic. In the early 90's it was AAD for digital sound on film and video. In the mid 90's it was ADD to accommodate 5.1 digital sound, and subsequent ADD revisions followed (Broadway 2000, Science of Sensation) for the longest time. They all traced back to that 4-track analog recording, and if you're Wendy Carlos these would be DAAA, DAAD, and DADD, since it was computer-generated.

Eclipse is historic because it introduces the first DDD (or DDDD for Wendy) Deep Note. Sorry, Grand doesn't count because it was an alternate itteration of the piece to co-exist with J.A.M.'s original version, along with James Horner's Cimarron. The Deep Note was Moorer's baby, and it was time for it to come of age, leaving young adulthood into straight-up adulthood. This transformation has made the revered, and reviled by some, piece of maximallist math-disco written with minimallist ethos into a nastier, deadlier aural monster, and I love it.

I miss the charm of the original 1983 recording. Eclipse may have turned that kick-ass ass-kicker into an adorable ass-kicker, and the recording that gave several Generation Y kids and Millenials nightmares, including myself, is now beaten by one of its own successors. For the first time, the 1983 Deep Note that stood the test of time is trumped by something scarier. The intimidating Generation X aural equivalent to a powerful drug cartel, is now an old fart that yells with a raspy voice. Not even the "saucier" remixes of the Note made in the 2000s were able to be at equals with the 70mm Baby Boom flavor. Eclipse gives us a Note that is so beastly I can't describe his actions here unless I want a ban. Last thing I would say is that it's refreshingly masculine after the previous effeminate trailers of the 2000s.

The graphics were simple, in classic THX fashion, but effective paired with the audio. I don't understand the significance of "see you on the other side." Was that a tribute to Harold Ramis? Was it about death? It's far more cryptic than "The Audience is Listening," and makes Eclipse the first THX trailer to become existential rather than escapist.

I'm still waiting for the 24-bit remaster of the original recalled Cimarron trailer. Modern state-of-the-art theaters can handle it, why not introduce it to a new generation?

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 04-04-2015 05:51 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would call it 'iris'!

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 04-04-2015 10:18 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marco Giustini
of course there's nothing wrong. What I meant is that they should associate the brand with the experience not necessarily with the knowledge of how the system works.

I do agree with you, but in the case of Atmos, this is not happening when you have a PLF message and perhaps a THX logo before the movie. Dolby needs to get as many cinemas as possible to just advertise Atmos and nothing else.

quote: Terry Monohan
. You would think with Dolby having It's main office and even expanding soon in SF they would have some great signage and advertising in the 3 theatres that they have Atmos playing in.
Are the 3 theaters in SF that have Atmos, are they PLF theaters? Or do they just have Dolby Atmos?

quote: Connor Wilson
I just watched it on YouTube.
I just saw the trailer on YouTube. To be honest, its not very good.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-05-2015 11:30 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The new THX Eclipse trailer is pretty decent looking. Some of the visuals make me think of the iris on an eyeball. I think the animators went kind of nuts with the lighting effects on the dark THX logo once it appeared. It's a little too flashy and disco like. Hopefully I'll get to hear the new trailer in action the next time I visit a Warren Theater either in Moore or Broken Arrow.

quote: Terry Monohan
To bad Dolby does not do any advertising these days about what theatres have the Dolby Atmos system.
Dolby does have a theater installations map that can be filtered to show only Atmos equipped theaters.

Unfortunately that map is only going to be good for people already familiar with Dolby Atmos or any other Dolby process. More really needs to be done at the movie theater level. Dolby could provide some help for that, but movie theaters have to do some of the work too since they all have their own specific sign systems. Theaters that have "digital signs," like HDTV screens doubling for movie poster cases could be showing videos from Dolby that could help promote Dolby Atmos. Each theater chain has its own unique web site and site layout. Dolby could give them suggestions what to do, but in the end each theater chain has to incorporate promotion for Atmos into their own web sites themselves.

Another problem: all the alphabet soup labeled, premium priced auditoriums. Theater chains are trying to put all their marketing oomph behind concepts the customers only confuse with IMAX' own very murky and deceptive branding. Those acronyms ultimately mean absolutely nothing. Customers don't know any of the specifics behind why a bigger auditorium has the acronym label and a higher ticket price. In most cases there is justification for the higher price. I don't think it's worth a price premium to watch a movie in standard single projector 2K or 4K and with 5.1 or 7.1 surround. There has to be more to it than that. At least there is some understanding for it with IMAX (they're all at least dual projector theaters). But IMAX often charges an even higher price than many other premium big screen theaters and yet only delivers HDTV resolution imagery and 5.0 surround. Their 4K laser projection system and 12 channel surround format upgrades are very long overdue.

Maybe Atmos can gain more traction with Dolby Cinema theaters, whenever they start appearing. Haven't seen any deals with American circuits inked just yet.

quote: Steve Guttag
However, I agree, Dolby has everything to gain to keep the Dolby brand associated with cinema and movies in general. DTS has no cinema presence anymore so they could keep in consumer's mind that movies = Dolby.
That could change once DTS launches the DTS:X format they're developing to compete with Atmos. Of course the bigger question is whether the partnership between DTS & Barco will result in Cinemark upgrading all those new Auro 11.1 installations to DTS:X. I don't like Auro, particularly because it has no 7.1 channel base layer. Lossless height and ceiling channels, but no discrete back wall surround channels is a step backwards. The primary channels being dropped to 16-bit as opposed to 24-bit is also a step backwards.

quote: Terry Monohan
I think Dolby Atmos will catch on with the public the more theatres have It installed and they plug It. Let's see the studios put the Dolby Atmos logo on the movie ads/posters with a *IN SELECT THEATRES.
Dolby Atmos is a very expensive system to install, especially if it is done right. The CP-850 cinema processor costs close to $30,000. Surround speakers in an Atmos system have to be more powerful than typical surround speakers. The best Atmos systems will have all the surround speakers separately amplified, not to mention have 3-way or 4-way stage speaker systems, plenty of sub-bass cabinets and at least a couple sub-bass cabinets in the surrounds. Not every Atmos equipped theater does that.

Atmos isn't treated very well in terms of branding with specific movie releases. Some movies will include a Dolby Atmos logo on the poster, but often at very microscopic sizes. Not all Atmos movie releases feature the Atmos logo on the end credits, but they'll include a Dolby Digital logo even if there aren't any theaters playing the movie in 35mm and lossy Dolby Digital.
[Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Buck Wilson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 894
From: St. Joseph MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2010


 - posted 04-06-2015 02:46 AM      Profile for Buck Wilson   Email Buck Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OH MY GOD I LOVE IT. It is literally perfect. Just when you think it's done building, it proceeds to blow your face clean off!!! Can't wait to see it in theaters!!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-06-2015 06:03 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
That could change once DTS launches the DTS:X format they're developing to compete with Atmos. Of course the bigger question is whether the partnership between DTS & Barco will result in Cinemark upgrading all those new Auro 11.1 installations to DTS:X. I don't like Auro, particularly because it has no 7.1 channel base layer. Lossless height and ceiling channels, but no discrete back wall surround channels is a step backwards. The primary channels being dropped to 16-bit as opposed to 24-bit is also a step backwards.
Nope...you missed it. DTS and Datasat are not one in the same. DTS has ZERO presence in Cinema. They are just in the home market. Datasat has zero presence in the home market (or effectively zero). Datasat has aligned themselves with Auro. Dolby, on the otherhand has a very visible presence in both cinema and home. At the moment, they are uniquely able to capitalize on one market to help the other. Now, if your claim is that other companies like USL might use DTS' technology and license it in their box...I suppose...but it will be a tough sell to get people to spend a lot of money (it still is going to be an expensive infrastructure) to put in such a system. As it is, the market has already diluted with Atmos and Auro going at it. With Auro's chief "benefit" is that it is a cheaper system to buy/install.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-06-2015 10:19 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know DTS and Datasat are separate companies now. Nevertheless they do indeed have some association with each other when it comes to next-gen audio formats. Both are partnered with Barco and Auro on this too. Supposedly some of the movies with Auro 11.1 mixes are using DTS MDA format in the mixing process. Datasat is selling audio processors for use with Auro 11.1 installations.

DTS:X has been announced for home theater. The company is planning a bigger "unveiling" April 9. From what I've read the DTS:X format is supposed to be "flexible" in being able to adapt to various speaker configurations. However, it is not compatible with Dolby Atmos and appears to have its preferred configuration modeled after Auro. So that may ultimately set the stage for channel-based Auro 11.1 installations to transition to DTS:X (or "Datasat:X" or "Auro:X").

quote: Steve Guttag
Datasat has zero presence in the home market (or effectively zero).
They do have the LS-10 home cinema processor, designed to play back Auro 11.1 and 13.1 audio tracks.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.