Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Dolby releases new software 2.8.11 for DCP2000/2K4 and ShowVault servers (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Dolby releases new software 2.8.11 for DCP2000/2K4 and ShowVault servers
Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-24-2016 12:19 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, the problem is with 7.1 screens and an 8 channel processor. using channel mapping to put BSL and BSR (11/12) on 7/8 rather than the normal HI/VI worked OK.
With SMPTE mapping over-riding the server mapping, you get HI/VI from the rear surrounds - but only when playing a SMPTE package.
The Odyssey card swaps the AES signals so whatever is playing on 11/12 will always play on the rear surrounds.
I'm not sure if it's intended behaviour. If you have server mapping it should act after the channel assignments in the metadata, in my opinion. When I asked Doremi about it a few months ago, I remember them as suggesting this "problem" would be fixed in a future release.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-24-2016 01:04 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the point of SMPTE channel mapping in the first place?

I completely understand being able to set channel mapping in the server for things like legacy sound processors. But that's a set-it-once-and-forget-it thing.

There is already a standardized channel layout; if the content can't be mastered to that standard, why should the server be forced to jump through hoops for broken content?

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-24-2016 01:32 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
I would say that the intersection of 5-screen channel theatres and those that have only 8-channels worth of inputs in their audio processor are very small, if not zero.
Hmm ... are you sure?

If a theatre has five stage channels, that is probably because it wants to play 70mm. The number of DCPs with five stage channel audio (i.e. a signal on channels 9 and 10) is tiny. In almost three years of working with digital cinema, I can only recall having encountered two, and that's working for a group of three theaters that shows almost exclusively arthouse, archival and re-release content. Almost all the five stage channel titles I've shown have been 70mm (either mag or DTS), plus a tiny handful of 8-track SDDS prints, and those two DCPs.

We now have AP20s as the primary audio processor in all three houses: this has 16 channels of AES input. However, half of those are used for DCP audio and the other half for DTS film audio (the 8-channel analog inputs are fed by CP200s for all other film sound).

So to enable us to play both five stage channel mix and modern 7.1 DCPs, we have to have two hardware dongles that juggle the AES pinouts from the media block, and physically swap the appropriate one in depending on which two channels on the DCP we want going into 7 and 8 on the AP20. As these take the form of DB25 to RJ45 converters with the pins in the appropriate slots, it's not difficult to do, but given the limitations of the AP20, it's all we can do. I don't know if it's possible to get an add-on card for the AP20 to give us more AES input channels, and if so how much they cost (investigating this is on the never ending "to do" list): if so, we could do away with the dongles and accomplish everything with channel mapping in the AP20 profiles, because we'd then be able to take all 16 DCP channels in, permanently. But at the moment, we're channel-limited.

My point is that I suspect that many if not most of the theatres that are wired for, and actually play five stage channel mixes regularly, probably won't have more than 8 AES input channels to play with exclusively for DCP audio.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-24-2016 03:18 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The AP20 is standard with 16 channels of AES. The 8-channel version is the low-cost option. You have 8-channels of analog. So a CP200 or like processor could come in on the 8-channel analog (L, LC, C, RC, R, Ls, Rs, SW)

With the 16 channel AES inputs, you can route what is coming off of a DCP in which way you want.

I know in my 5-screen channel theatres, we have used products like the QSC DCP300 to bring the film sound in analog and the DCP comes in on the two AES connectors for the full 16-channels to be used as needed, per format.

If you want something to scratch your head over...check out QSC's new DPM100 processor AES 1 is channels 1-8 BUT 7/8 are not for HI/VI...they have a separate input for them. AES 15/16. It is another RJ45 but only pair 4 are connected and you need to get HI/VI to them. So think about that. If you have an IMB that only has RJ45s, there is no clean way to run the cables. you will need to break the signals at one end and put them in the "other" connector...or depend on someone like Odyssey to make a hardware solution...thereby defeating part of the ease of using CAT cable. I wish they had just used a DB25 with all of the channels on that 1-8 and 15/16 on the standard pinout (Dolby's, not that goofy, never standardized, "DCI" thingy that Doremi and Ultra called out). This way, if you make your cables, you have an easy solution. If you want to use RJ45s there are several sources of RJ45 to DB25 connectors for cheap and Odyssey can save the day again, as usual.

Adam, the idea on the SMPTE scheme is that channels would be uniform by name, not by anyone's preferred pinout. When mastering content, Left is left is left and it will "find" the right hole to come out of on the mediablock.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-24-2016 04:32 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
It still sounds to me like it's a solution to a problem that didn't exist.

 |  IP: Logged

Kristo Nalo
Film Handler

Posts: 24
From: Skopje, MK, MK, Macedonia
Registered: Nov 2016


 - posted 12-27-2016 03:48 AM      Profile for Kristo Nalo   Email Kristo Nalo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you very much for this useful information! Can't wait to try this one.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-27-2016 06:42 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I hear that the HI/VI tracks varied around the globe. In the US, they have always been on 7/8 but I hear that in some parts of Europe, they would be on 15/16. Having something like that always come out of the right spigot would seem to be of value.

However, had the industry not waffled around on it, the problem would have never presented itself. LC/RC have also migrated from 7/8 to 9/10. And then rumble seats have jumped on 13.

Personally, I don't think that HI/VI should have ever been on one of the main 16 channel tracks (nor DBox). There should have been low-bandwidth ADA tracks like DTS did on the XD10. You don't need 20-20K tracks to carry essentially telephone quality information. Having Data tracks should have been how things like rumble seats or smellovision or whatever get into a DCP.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 12-27-2016 10:16 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
However, had the industry not waffled around on it, the problem would have never presented itself. LC/RC have also migrated from 7/8 to 9/10. And then rumble seats have jumped on 13.
Agreed completely; the existing DCI channel allocations are not obvious or intuitive. So we've got to try to work with an imperfect standard, and one that isn't the same as other multi-channel mapping schemes (e.g. consumer BD/HDMI players, which put 7.1 left rear and right rear on 7 and 8, or DTS 8-track), which creates its own set of issues when trying to play DCPs, film audio and alternative content, all going into the same main audio processor.

quote: Steve Guttag
With the 16 channel AES inputs, you can route what is coming off of a DCP in which way you want.
Only if you have the luxury of being able to use all 16 of those channels for DCP audio, which we don't, and which I'd speculate many of the houses that have and use five stage channels don't (because apart from immersive audio formats, most of the five stage channel content out there is either 70mm or SDDS film). If you only have eight of them for the DCP server, then if you want to play 5.1 plus the HI/VI commentaries, 7.1, and a five stage channel mix, you've got to find a way to multipurpose 7 and 8 - either hardware (crossing over wires in the connectors) or by channel mapping in the DCP server.

 |  IP: Logged

Harold Hallikainen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 906
From: Denver, CO, USA
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 12-27-2016 10:30 AM      Profile for Harold Hallikainen   Author's Homepage   Email Harold Hallikainen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On use of full range tracks for HI/VI, we have an option in the JSD-60 (and, if I remember correctly, in the upcoming firmware release of the JSD-100) that pulls VI from the LFE track with a 200Hz HPF. We don't yet have the option in the CMS-2200 to put VI on the same output as LFE with a 200Hz HPF, but we SHOULD get to that. Then, with locally generated HI, you have 16 channels available for auditorium audio.

On using AES/EBU outputs for data (such as Atmos FSK sync or DBOX motion code), SMPTE has established a standard for binary sync over one channel of AES/EBU and an HTTP transfer protocol for auxiliary data (such as immersive sound, motion data, etc.). If the auxiliary data is encrypted, the server sends the data to the external device for decryption in the external device. This requires KDM delivery to the external device (for which there currently is not a transport standard) and the same security requirements that an IMB has (secure boundary, tamper protection, etc.), which gets expensive. I suspect the future is in rendering within the media block / server (as USL and GDC are currently doing).

Harold

Harold

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 12-27-2016 01:55 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
The HI track on trailers tends to be a mix-down "with emphasis on dialog" and not a dialog-only track. How is it being treated for features?

Lionsgate seems to be the predominant user of the VI track on trailers, but it's only a narrator stating "Tyler Perry's Boo! A Madea Halloween coming in October from Lionsgate" at the beginning and then nothing the rest of the trailer. (Not that I'd expect anything useful from a VI track on a fast-cut trailer.)

 |  IP: Logged

Magnus Eriksson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 121
From: Stockholm, Hägersten, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 12-28-2016 09:46 AM      Profile for Magnus Eriksson   Email Magnus Eriksson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This might be a stupid question.
I updated a DCP2000 from 2.6.4 to 2.8.11 yesterday. The projector is a vintage series 1 Christie with a TI board from the stone age. I have a Dolphin 1.2 with FW 21.2k.
After the update the Diagnostic Tool system tab yells about "Security Manager not answering" and "Incorrect network configuration". SM version says "missing" in red.
I really don¨t remember this happening in 2.6.4.
However, DCP:s do play fine, both encrypted and unencrypted.
So, since Sweden is a Dolby DSS territory Doremis are quite unusual. My perhaps stupid question is: Can I install SM 2.1.104 with Dolphin FW 21.2k and still play encrypted content on the old Christie (and will the Diagnostic Tool stop yelling)?
/M.E.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-28-2016 12:42 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AFAIK you can safely install the latest SM on any machines.

Have you *power cycled* the doremi after the update??

 |  IP: Logged

Magnus Eriksson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 121
From: Stockholm, Hägersten, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 12-28-2016 01:24 PM      Profile for Magnus Eriksson   Email Magnus Eriksson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Three times. Last try I brutally pulled the power cords and went for a cup of coffee.
/M.E.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-28-2016 03:27 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
that's not a Dolby Server, it won't like it!

What is your current version of SM?

I'd delete/save/create the projector again in the device manager. I am not familiar with that SW version yet but the SM can misbehave (in an IMB) if the projector is not married. It does not make sense but I'd try that anyway!

 |  IP: Logged

Magnus Eriksson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 121
From: Stockholm, Hägersten, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2011


 - posted 12-28-2016 05:33 PM      Profile for Magnus Eriksson   Email Magnus Eriksson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know it doesn´t like that, it was just reciprocated love [Big Grin]
As far as I can remember there has been no SM present att all. Just "missing" (in black) or "N/A". I just thought it wasn't needed with 21.2k non CTP/series 1 'very old'.
But; if I install a SM, will I forever lose the ability to play encrypted content with this combo with no turning back? It works fine now, it´s just the Diagnostic Tool grunting in the background.
I can give delete/create/save projector a try tomorrow though.
/M.E.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.