|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Pearl Harbor
|
Dwayne Caldwell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Rockwall, TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 05-31-2001 09:57 AM
I'm with Joe on the pre-marital sex thing.  Pearl Harbor may hearken back to From Here to Eternity and Tora! Tora! Tora!, but those were classics. This film is crap. Aside from sharing the same genre, it's not even close to being in the same league as the aforementioned films. So I don't consider it an adequate comparsion. As for Bay's editing, that's the least of his problems. And there is something to be said about a film taking in more than 600 million domestically and tying with Ben Hur in receiving the most awards for a motion picture. Therefore, in my opinion, you really can't compare Pearl with Titanic like all the critics have been doing. Titanic is far superior to Bay's joke in every aspect of the film making process. ------------------ The man with the magic hands.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason A. Forno
Film Handler
Posts: 8
From: Ormond Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 06-02-2001 02:52 AM
Dwayne... so by your reasoning, Titanic and Ben-Hur are compairable because they both had the same Oscar nods? My dear boy, surely this is a glitch in your thinking. As far as your statement about how much Titanic pulled in domesticly, it only proves my point further... Cameron made a very manipulative film. It was designed to make woman swoon and leave the theater crying. And as far a the pre-marital sex thing is concerned. I was merely pointing out the fact that Rose is a Slut for sleeping with Jack and that Evelyn is not. (For moving on with her life after hearing of Rafe's passing). I know that a lot of you watch classic movies. You wouldn't be true to the profession if you didn't... I was just shocked to hear so many of you trash a very good film. I ask... I know every movie can not be a Saving Private Ryan, but give me Pearl Harbor to watch on Thursday night over say... What's The Worst That Could Happen, Freddy Got Fingered, Spy Kids, Joe Dirt, Along Came A Spider, Someone Like You, Saving Silverman, The Pledge, Head Over Heels, Sweet November, The Replacements, Pokemon 3, Dude, Where's My Car? and so on and so forth. So when your sitting in the auditorium on Thursday night watching the latest greatest from David Spade... know that your just sitting around watching, while other are out doing.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mitchell Cope
Master Film Handler

Posts: 256
From: Overland Park, KS, United States
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 06-02-2001 08:02 AM
quote: I know every movie can not be a Saving Private Ryan, but give me Pearl Harbor to watch on Thursday night over say... What's The Worst That Could Happen, Freddy Got Fingered, Spy Kids, Joe Dirt, Along Came A Spider, Someone Like You, Saving Silverman, The Pledge, Head Over Heels, Sweet November, The Replacements, Pokemon 3, Dude, Where's My Car? and so on and so forth.
The films you named could have been just as good as "Pearl Harbor" if they had put $135 Million into a bombing raid over Hawaii. I blame the writer, Randall Wallace, for this film. Other than "The Man In The Iron Mask" (which he also directed) and "Braveheart", Mr. Wallace has done mostly television writing (e.g. "Hunter"). The plot execution was obviously contrived. In "Titanic", I might have anticipated an iceberg, but I never wanted it to hurry up and get here.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Dwayne Caldwell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Rockwall, TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 06-02-2001 09:26 AM
Well sure Titanic and Ben-Hur are comparable. Both are epics, both have great visuals for their time, the scores are wonderful, the technical achievements are worty of Oscar honors, and, at least for me anyway, they are both extrememly enjoyable to watch. Normally, I'm against most of the Academy's decisions, but I happen to think '97 was an exception because the awards, at least I thought, went to the right people. A lot goes into a motion picture, and I've all ready admitted that the visuals as well as the cinematography in Pearl were impressive, but the other elements, the story, the direction, the score, the acting, and the sound are not to my liking. And I don't think one can slash a movie like Titanic on the merits alone that Rose is a slut or that the love story is somewhat manipulative.And as far as manipulation goes, I don't think most directors out there can invoke a particular emotion without some form of it. I mean you can't tell me that watching a bunch of defenseless Navy men wading in the water while the Japanese mow them down with strafing runs isn't some form of manipulation. True, it's an accurate depiction, but how many audience members are going to be angered by those scenes? I know I was. Or how many Japanese people watching this show do you think are going to feel awkward watching this? Even more so now that we are allies? No, Jason I don't think my logic is glitched unless I'm drinking. And I was very much sober when I watched this film, and I still do not like it, and again, that is my opinion and if it shocks you that my tastes are not in agreement with yours, well then I apologize. ------------------ The man with the magic hands.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Jason A. Forno
Film Handler
Posts: 8
From: Ormond Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 06-03-2001 02:05 AM
Dwayne, How can you say that all of Titanic's Oscars were rightfully won! Tell me how, when we had so many great films that year. L.A. Confidential is a thousand times the movie Titanic will ever be. Julia Roberts wins an Oscar because everyone wants to remember that performance, because its to hard to swallow what Ellen Burstyn did in Requiem For A Dream. So by this logic, Titanic sweeps the Oscars preventing worthy movies from receiving their just rewards. L.A. Confidential sweept every single critics awards in '97, but who won the Oscar... Titanic. Also your not addressing what I have been saying all along about Pearl Harbor. Randall Walace's story may have weak spots, but a least he doesn't have his main characters spitting off the side of a ship(or out of a plane) as they are falling in love. Titanic and its weak-ass story line could float out to sea for all I care. Cameron's ideas are so forced and manipulative that you find yourself being leaf like cattle to the slaughter. Look up the original script for Titanic, Bill Paxton's character was in early drafts a fame seeking ego maniac, but after test screenings, sections of his dialoge were cut to make him more sympathetic. I not saying that Michael Bay doesn't listen to what the test screenings tell him, but the simple fact remains that Titanic is not deserving of such praise, technical awards maybe... maybe. Surely not Best Picture, not over Good Will Hunting, L.A. Confidential, and As Good As It Gets. All three of these films have so much more to offer than Titanic. Now if you want to talk music scores. I guess your just not into your feminine side. The love story is a weepy romantic triangle, so Hans delivers a lush, romantic, innocent theme for the movie. I myself was shocked the first time I heard it on the web site for the movie, yet over time I have begun to favor as suitable for the film. Hats off to you Michael Bay for making an enjoyable film that everyone, from all walks can enjoy and learn from. All the nay-sayers can sit at home and watch the historical accuracy of movies like the The Longest Day, which felt like the longest movie to get through. And feel free to use my posts as quotes... it let's me know that its sinking in.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 06-03-2001 02:13 AM
For what it's worth I liked Titanic 10 times over the movies Jason mentioned. I believe the general public has also voted that same way. Just look at the legs Titanic had! I didn't see L.A.Confidential running in theaters that long. Pearl Harbor was obviously a wanna-be Titanic, which is why I find the last post that speaks so negatively toward Titanic humorous. James Cameron is one of the best directors around and his work on Titanic was magnificent, despite whether anyone likes to watch other people spitting.As to the Oscar comments, the year Titanic won was one of the only years I wasn't screaming in pain at the Academy's decisions. Oh well, to each his own, right? 
| IP: Logged
|
|
David Baum
Film Handler
Posts: 90
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 06-03-2001 05:12 AM
BobbyHi and thanks for sharing your thoughts. I happen to have watched it a second time ( ) yesterday in a smaller theater: 12meter 2.35 screen, Altec Lansig power amps (94xx serie), DTS sound, 240 seats room, Klispch speakers. The sound was much better, more violent (while indistorted), more "impacting", especially on gun shots and machine guns shots. The explosions went deeper and tighter. Dialogues still remain an issue here. Let's hope for the dvd  All in all, I admit that kind of room size and screen size ( more contrast, crisper image ) over large ones. Surrounds where superb, no wonder with the romm twice narrower. A 40 or 45 wide room, and 40ft screen is really the right compromise to me. The theater was not THX certified but was using THX gears.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dwayne Caldwell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Rockwall, TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 06-03-2001 07:51 AM
Jason,Now you're slamming The Longest Day? Man, I just don't get your taste. And it's obvious you don't get mine. So I guess as Brad said before, to each his own, right?  And as far as music scores go, most of my collection comprises Williams, Goldsmith, and Horner. Men who know how to use the brass section! So yeah. I guess I'm not as in touch with my feminine side. That and I'm just not a big fan of Zimmer. I only have the scores to Gladiator, Broken Arrow and Backdraft and the latter two were gifts. You obviously have gotten more out of this picture than most of us, and that's fine. But I still happen to think Titanic is better. Also understand that despite the luggies, the pre-marital sex, and Paxton's toned down ego-manical character, I happen to think Titanic is overall a better film than the best picture contenders of '97. I'm not just looking at the storyline in Titanic, I'm also admiring Cameron's directing, editing, and storyboarding capabilities. And there is no "maybe" about the technical aspects warranting award. Especially when you've got Gary Rydstrom doing the sound mix for instance. To take on an immense project in the $200 million range and deliver a movie like Titanic is worthy, I think, of an Oscar. Even for Best Picture. As for the characters, I cared for the ones in Titanic more than I did the ones in Pearl Harbor. And if you think the characters are childish in hocking luggies for love (at least he wasn't teaching Rose how to delevop other groteque habits such as belching or passing wind in the movie {unless its in the director's cut}), you must admit that the two main characters playing a game of chicken with two P-40 fighter planes during practice, while not directly related to the love story, is just as childish. But at least the love story in Pearl is more respectable as far as body functions go, yes. I will agree with that. But it's still a weak ass one. And I didn't think it was as strong as the love story in Titanic. I'm not saying there's something to be said for saliva, don't get me wrong. I just have to care about the characters in the first place before I can care about the love story. Actually, now that I think about it, I'm not sure if you CAN spit from a P-40 like that. ------------------ The man with the magic hands.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Andy Muirhead
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Galashiels, Scotland
Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted 06-07-2001 07:24 PM
I haven't watched the whole film yet, but have seen bit's, the harbour attack has some excellent effects, though one thing really struck a chord with me...About two hours into the film, an elderly gentleman came out and said he felt a bit strange, so we gave him a glass of water, and as he was recovering he said "I was watching this and some girls behind me were laughing, and all i was thinking was, if only they knew what i went through" whoa, what can you say? It might be just some bruckheimer production to us, but hey! makes you think a bit harder!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|