Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Transformers 2009 (can't be bothered with the full title) (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Transformers 2009 (can't be bothered with the full title)
Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 06-24-2009 05:22 AM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's exactly what you expect from a Michael Bay movie. Everything is big and loud, and be blows stuff up real good. The first half of the movie was actually fairly entertaining. But the last 45-60 minutes it just goes into over drive and my brain more or less shut down.

Megan Fox does look amazingly hot. And there are a number of shot designed to tell the men in the audience "Megan Fox is hot and all you can do is dream". Once the movie went into over drive and everyone is just running around screaming while stuff blows up, I found myself paying more attention to whether Megan's boobs would pop out of her shirt - and wondering how they didn't!

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-24-2009 03:17 PM      Profile for Brian Michael Weidemann   Author's Homepage   Email Brian Michael Weidemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
All you have to do to make a person hot is to give them an orange tan. That's how you know they're supposed to be hot; they're orange. Megan Fox looks like plastic, and that other girl at the college looks like they were double-casting for her.

The full-frame IMAX portions were really cool to watch. Two big sequences were the only places they filmed that way: the first big fight in a forest, and the big pyramid one at the end. The latter had a lot more cuts from standard letterbox to full-frame, back and forth. Some people said that was distracting, others didn't notice (and this is a "real" IMAX theatre and screen), but I definitely did notice while watching from the booth. The full-frame just makes the whole movie eye-widening at that moment, because all of a sudden there's more to take in. Surprisingly, the garbled, mechanical mesh of metal and gears and pistons becomes more discernable as characters doing actions, not just CG motion and explosions; even if for just a moment here or there.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Tommassello
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 547
From: Coatesville, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 06-24-2009 03:38 PM      Profile for Joe Tommassello   Email Joe Tommassello       Edit/Delete Post 
"2009 (can't be bothered with the full title)" is a hell of a lot longer than "Revenge of the Fallen". Feeble attempt at humor.

quote: Victor Liorentas
If Michael Bay had a grasp of how to direct like his heroes James Cameron
Yeah - Henry Jones III could teach Megan Fox how to "spit like a man"! OK, so technically that's his writing but it's still Cameron.

 |  IP: Logged

David Alexander B
Film Handler

Posts: 16
From: Waterloo Belgium
Registered: Jul 2008


 - posted 06-24-2009 05:32 PM      Profile for David Alexander B   Author's Homepage   Email David Alexander B   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
guys how do you rate the sound mix ?
played at reference how was it ?
cause someone must have turned down the vol last night here...

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 06-24-2009 07:31 PM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
had a look at this yesterday , well i can remember much about the first one , so maybe that was not that good either.

I started off ok action bit of humor fast pace , then it just seemed to repeat itself. It is waaaaay to long , wrap this into 90 minutes and it would have been alot better.

sound was good , camera work sucked.

I found myself wanting it to end when it still had an hour to run.

2.5 out of 5 from me.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-24-2009 08:03 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am excited. I am going to see this movie just so I can complain about it (I am an old-school Transformers fan). What's more, I am going to see it at a theater I used to work at for a long time so I'll have even more to complain about! I can't wait!

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 06-24-2009 09:39 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cinemark Movies 14, Mishawaka IN
Auditorium 12, 35mm, Dole Bee Digit All
Presentation: [thumbsup] Turn up the fader please!

Big giant robots beating the piss out of each other. Throw in a stupid plot and you get a meagerly ok popcorn flick. Quite frankly, I got a little bored with this one. Maybe because I saw it in 35mm, or maybe because it was too long, drawn out, and just not as interesting as the first film.

Dare I say, ugh, I did not really like this. [Confused]

I sure hope the sound mix was better than what I heard too. Usually auditorium 12 is great, but something about this lacked what 12 can usually do. I MAY give this a try in REEL IMAX to see if it is up to snuff.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-24-2009 09:50 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Aaron Garman
I MAY give this a try in REEL IMAX to see if it is up to snuff.
Doubt it...it'll still be smelly, just a bigger smelly. [bs]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Hossen
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 136
From: Perth, Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 06-24-2009 10:37 PM      Profile for Michael Hossen   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Hossen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As a fan of the first instalment, I have to say, this one sucked!

I left the cinema wondering wondering why everyone else seemed to love it. Oh well, it's still going to do well here, regardless of how shit is really is.

 |  IP: Logged

David Favel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 764
From: Ashburton, New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-25-2009 01:09 AM      Profile for David Favel   Email David Favel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At our preview we kicked it up by 1.5.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-25-2009 01:23 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Regal United Artists Greenwood Plaza "Stadium" 12
AUDITORIUM: 5
PRESENTATION: 35mm film with ??? Digital, probably SDDS because I installed an SDDS unit in there years ago and there is still an SDDS plaque I mounted outside of the auditorium doors, though this auditorium can run DTS as well. Simplex XL projectors with auto-turrets that still reset the screen to flat after each show (side masking). I snuck into the small auditoriums and the masking does not reset to flat since it is common width in there, but they used to before I was employed. I am glad to see that they did not reverse my rewiring. Nobody likes to see their screens get smaller when the movie starts.
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: Volume was too low, the head of reel 4 was crazy dirty, as if someone built it up on to a 7000' reel and took it to the MUT with the head dragging on the floor. Various dirtiness throughout the print. The cues were little circles on the frameline, very annoying. Xenon bulb wasn't focused very well (always a problem at this theater with the crappy Strong Super Highlight lamphouses) and the green bands of the trailers bounced onto the screen indicating that whoever assembled the print spliced way too close to the green bands. Hell, at least they included the green bands unlike lesser theaters. At least 3 lab splices, one causing the audio to drop to silence for a half a second. Preshow volume was crazy low, but that is a plus because I want to hear myself talk over the preshow. All in all the theater was better when I was there, but we all know that, right? [Wink]

The Movie:
Well... at least it had more color than McG's Terminator 4. The story was stupid and the design of the actual robots looked really bad. It is just a lousy style. I did not care for the two black Autobots who where intended for comic relief. There was one girl Autobot who had one line in the movie but she looked like all the rest. Seriously, the robots should not be this "detailed". They look messy and very uncoordinated. Also, it takes them forever to transform. Who was the robot hanging out in space? Why did it take him 2 years to figure that he could hack into a satellite? Why does he sound like Dr. Claw from Inspector Gadget? Oh wait... that must be Soundwave, because without the vocoder applied he sounds like Dr. Claw in the old cartoon. Yup, they finally got Frank Welker back, but he still doesn't voice Megatron. They should have used the vocoder. Also, a robot called Devastator was in the first movie and he transformed into a tank. But here a bunch of construction vehicles combine to form Devastator and he is like a giant crab. WTF?

Out of all the Transformers incarnations from Beast Wars to Armada to all of that shit, Michael Bay's version is the worst. And believe me, the other crap is baaaaad! They started out good and then someone came along and said "Hmmm, what can we do to make this more shitty?" New incarnations continued until Michael Bay came along and said "I can do shit better than anyone. Leave it to me to fuck everything up BIG TIME!"

And everyone loves him for it. Go figure.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 06-25-2009 08:47 AM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
we opened to a full house with it today , it has apparently broken all opening box office records in Australia today as well.

I am very interested to see what legs it has.............. massive drop in week 2 maybe [Confused]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Hossen
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 136
From: Perth, Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 06-25-2009 11:28 AM      Profile for Michael Hossen   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Hossen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
we opened to a full house with it today , it has apparently broken all opening box office records in Australia today as well.

I am very interested to see what legs it has.............. massive drop in week 2 maybe [Confused]

Phil, I heard this too.

We've been doing very good with it down here. Just over 400 admissions each for Wednesday and Thursday. Good for mid-week.

It'll be interesting to see when it drops off.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-25-2009 12:01 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe, I am disappointed you didn't see that at the Chinese. You must go to the Chinese tonight and view the same movie and give us your report from there.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-25-2009 02:05 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't get in the Chinese for free because they are run by Karotes or some weird-ass company like that and they aren't friends with anyone, so no outsiders allowed. For the next movie I see, I will choose the Continental so I can complain about their dim picture!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.