|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What would you ban in your movie theatre?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 11-11-2001 09:20 PM
Oh this is an easy one...Ban typical Business Management graduates...they have proven that they just don't get to concept that a "show" is a valuable resourse that doesn't translate well to spread sheets so can't be quantified... What typical Business Management graduates have proven is that they can drive cinemas (and other entertainment based businesses) to bankruptcy in mass. Steve PS...I will go on record that I disagree with JW's statement on operators...one per screen is ideal but they have to be the real kind that think they are actually being paid to work. This industry's most profitable years were with one operator per screen (or more actually). ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 11-12-2001 12:24 AM
I don't see the need for one operator per screen either. With today's automation (platters or automated changeovers), that payroll would be much better spent on having an usher sit in each auditorium, memorizing the film. Of course we all know that will never happen.Gerard, the secret to preventing those gunfights between gangs is for Hollywood to stop making those crappy "violent exploitation movies" that do nothing than to get the audience all fired up. Steve, do you honestly believe that this industry had more profitable years solely because there was one projectionist working each screen? Have you forgotten about videotapes, satellite, DVDs and the basic fact that Hollywood can't seem to make a decent movie lately? Quantity of projectionists in relation to profits on a movie is absurd. One GOOD operator can run an automated multiplex by himself just fine without sacrificing presentation standards. Having two operators is extra icing.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jim Ziegler
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 753
From: West Hollywood, CA
Registered: Jul 99
|
posted 11-12-2001 03:19 AM
Brad, You seem to think I am paranoid about a terrorist attack at my theatre.. You know what, you are partly right.. Do you know why I am concerned? Quite simply because it has already happended at my theatre, in August of 1999. Terrorists, whether they are targeting a crowded pizza restaurant in Israel, or the London subways, pick a target for, typically, one of three (or sometimes a combination of the three) reasons: symbolic impact, disruptive capablility and potential body count. The WTC achieved all three. Why hit a theatre? Simple. There is a large quantity of people, in a single room, and a successful attack would scare the American people away from social gatherings. Don't believe me? Compare how many people are flying now compared to before 9/11. Now, can you totally prevent an attack? No. Something as small as a fragmentation grenade can kill dozens of people. However, the inablility to obtain 100% protection does not, in any way, excuse ignoring the problem. Had there been more dedication to airport security, perhaps the attack on 9/11 would have been prevented. On a personal note, my removing my location has nothing to do with a fear that Osama will come after me.. My reasons for removing it were personal, and, frankly, I have to wonder why you care so much.. But since you do, I put it back. I would hate for you to loose sleep.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 11-12-2001 05:10 PM
I've always believed the public bears the responsibility of maintaining their own safety, rather than counting on someone else always. Like an usher or operator per screen is going to stop a fight, much less a gang shoot-out. Seriously. You could have ten ushers per auditorium and it wouldn't matter in that situation. This is where allowing people with a CCW permit to carry without getting pestered by some high-and-mighty, "I'm gonna protect the world from evil by ordering this law-abiding citizen off my premises", manager or whatever. Believe me, if I'm in a theatre somewhere, and someone threatens my safety, I'm not going to sit there and leave it up to an usher. Police are a differnt matter of course, but they usually respond after the worst is over anyway.In reference to 9/11, it appears the only reason a 4th target wasn't hit was because a few members of the public decided to count on themselves. As it has to happen sometimes, public safety was defended by the public. ------------------ "Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk!" - Homer Simpson
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 11-12-2001 07:48 PM
When I took the performance part of the New York City licensing examination for Theatre Projectionist, I was quizzed on booth and audience safety in the event on fire or civil disorder.The history of projectionists began with itinerant showmen followed by "the Professor" with his magic lantern or stereopticon, then motion picture projector. But always the patrons had the secure, comforting feeling that someone of intelligence and authority was in charge. This responsibility was recognized by civil legislatures; hence the questions on the NYC exam. I think it is unconscionable to profit by the congregation of large numbers of the public and then to deny responsibility for their safety. The projectionist controls the lights and sound, and can raise the auditorium lights and stop the show to permit the safe evacuation of the house in case of fire, riot or other disaster. Then the manager and his staff can use microphone, bullhorn or his voice,together with his ushers, to calm the patrons and lead them to safety. I have had the experience of informing the manager and, in his temporary absence, the police and fire department of emergencies, stopping the show and raising the lights to permit EMS workers to administer medical aid and to carry out heart-attack victims; I also reported a man with a hunting knife threatening theatre doormen and ushers, and one time two thieves. Yes, Brad, I agree the nature of some films can attract gangs and violent behavior. But the deployment of the theatre staff-- projectionist, manager, doormen, cashiers, ushers (and lets bring back the Saturday morning "Matrons")--working as a team, with practiced plans of coordinated response in case of emergencies, can return to our theatres the moral responsibility we have to the public who make our jobs and salaries possible.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|