Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Too many Trailers article from the St. Paul paper (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Too many Trailers article from the St. Paul paper
Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 08-31-2003 01:30 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Only projection flaw: one of the reels allowed to run all the way out, tail and all and we were left staring at a pure white light screen for around thirty seconds!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Steve?

That's just one out of a thousand different screw-ups that you can make... sure, maybe one that is more common to changeover setups, but there are still a thousand other things you can :sex:up regardless of your film transport system.

That said, I too have been treated to a white screen at the end of a reel. A sticky splice caused a brain wrap on their platter, which caused the film to jam (no useful failsafe system) in their projector, which led to the film melting on the screen and then to me starring at their white screen. [Razz]

It also took them much longer than 30 seconds to get back on screen... probably closer to 4 minutes.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-31-2003 01:09 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Martin said,
quote:
"But shouldn't the decision as to how many trailers be shown be up to audience reaction and not up to the staff?"
Yes, but the staff is on the floor and they hear the reaction of the audience. My co-director was always in the house and she was very atune to the patrons. So I would take my cue from her.

And:
quote:
I was actually a little taken aback when the movie started right away, because I wasn't expecting it. I actually think not having anything was a negative, because the audience wasn't settled in and one's eyes weren't accustomed to the darkened theater
Exactly -- that's why our protocol brings the house lights to "half house" setting for the last 3 minutes of the preshow music, precisely to aclimate the patrons to the theatre environment. At the very end of the preshow music, the house lights then drop to "Credits" level which brings the seating area down to 1/3rd while keeping the isle lights up slightly more. Then after the credits of the cartoon finish, everything goes to "Show" setting.

Gotta keep the patrons' comfort in mind all the time.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-02-2003 12:14 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Exactly -- that's why our protocol brings the house lights to "half house" setting for the last 3 minutes of the preshow music, precisely to aclimate the patrons to the theatre environment. At the very end of the preshow music, the house lights then drop to "Credits" level which brings the seating area down to 1/3rd while keeping the isle lights up slightly more. Then after the credits of the cartoon finish, everything goes to "Show" setting.

Otherwise known as "Showmanship". [Cool] Unfortunately, at some theatres, presentation quality and showmanship are lost arts.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 09-02-2003 06:25 PM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
*joining thread late*

I've been going to a lot of movies lately. And I love the trailers, but I think 4 is just right, especially with a Fandango Trailer, Policy Trailer and that stupid-ass anti-piracy trailer.

Is there a thread somewhere around here complaining about THAT???
*goes to find it*

-Scott-

 |  IP: Logged

Ky Boyd
Hey I'm #23

Posts: 314
From: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-03-2003 03:00 AM      Profile for Ky Boyd   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Death to the Fandango Trailer!

Maybe we could kill it and Movie Tunes off in one shot.

Did I mention I love the Loews Cell Phone Ejector Seats trailer? I want one or five!

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 09-03-2003 01:46 PM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do like Loews attention on the cell phones. If you get five, I'll dance a jig for one of them.

Is there a rant somewhere already about the Anti-Piracy trailer? I can't find it.

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 09-25-2003 05:38 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I saw American Splendor in a local theater yesterday (first day of the run) and there were absolutely no trailers, snipes or ads. That really surprised me, but maybe they didn't have time to put it together as yet.
Had to have been an indie arthouse. One advantage of seeing arthouse fare in an AMC, Regal, or UA is that you get a trailer pack in front of the feature.

The UA Union Square included the trailer for Le Divorce in front of L'Auberge Espagnole. Had I not seen that trailer I might not have seen Le Divorce.

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 09-28-2003 09:35 AM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Trailers are good on busy nights so the people sitting down have something to watch while there is still a line at the consession stand. Say, I'd bet people would love seeing a cartoon before the show [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-28-2003 10:37 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pre-show content can be entertaining, as well as a significant source of revenue to the theatre. But customers should be informed of the timing, such that they can decide what time to arrive for the show. For example, a notice that "Published start times include 20 minutes of pre-show entertainment and trailers."

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-28-2003 10:53 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The policy at GCC and AMC was that shows should be started five minutes before the scheduled start time. The idea was that the filmed ads would end (and trailers would start) at the scheduled start time. Apparently this worked because NCN supplied both intermission slides and film ads. At chains which have different suppliers for each, I'm told that the slide contract often requires that the film program not start until the scheduled start time (so that the audience is more likely to see the slides).

I still say that film ads for products that aren't closely associated with the filmgoing experience (especially bad 35mm transfers from video of TV commercials) are intrusive and annoying, regardless of the start time. I don't especially like slide ads, but I can tolerate them, especially if they help to reduce ticket prices and/or improve presentation quality.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-29-2003 06:24 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott,
quote:
I can tolerate them, especially if they help to reduce ticket prices and/or improve presentation quality
-- in your dreams! [Big Grin]

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 12-19-2003 06:50 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The local Register-Guard newspaper ran several articles about pre-show movie clutter in the entertainment section today. Moderators, do whatever you think you need to do if this is too much. [Smile]

Previews of Coming Distractions

December 19, 2003

Some previews of coming distractions
By Lewis Taylor
The Register-Guard

At Cinemark 17, a screening of "Master and Commander" kicks off with a 21-minute mix of trailers, ads and public service announcements. Across the city at [Regal] Cinema World 8, the same film begins with 23 minutes of pre-feature promos.

Coke commercials, Estee Lauder ads, anti-drug spots and video game teasers have become as much a part of the multiplex experience as the coming attractions. And while industry experts say viewers can expect to see even more ads coming soon to a theater near them, some moviegoers already have had enough.

"The previews are fairly entertaining," says Martin Campbell, 40, of Eugene. "But personally, I don't like to pay money to watch commercials."

Campbell's sentiments are being echoed by film fans in other parts of the country. A number of different consumer advocacy groups have popped up, including the Portland-based Captive Motion Picture Audience of America, which protests "TV-like advertising" in the cinema and encourages viewers to write or call national theater chains to complain.

Paul Dergarabedian, president of the Los Angeles box-office tracker Exhibitor Relations, says in general, audiences enjoy the trailers; it's the commercials they can do without. Even so, he says, viewer discontent is not strong enough to make the ads go away.

"What are you going to do?" Dergarabedian wonders. "You can complain to the manager I suppose, but are you really not going to see 'Lord of the Rings' because they might show a Grand Am commercial before the movie?

"It's just the economics of the business, and it's manifested itself in this way."

Edward Hahn, 61, of Monroe isn't ready to embrace the ads, at least not so many of them. He says the movie theater is looking more and more like the satellite TV system he has at home. In other words, cluttered with commercials.

"I didn't' mind it when they used to just have a Coca-Cola (ad) at the beginning or an XM Radio (ad), Hahn said. "But now they're kind of overdoing it."

The European way

Along with a handful of previews, moviegoers in Eugene and Springfield can now expect a pair of public service announcements, a couple of Coca-Cola ads and half a dozen other plugs for everything from video games to all-over body spray.

"With television you can understand it because it's free," says Tom Canning, 67, of Vancouver, B.C. "You pay enough money to go to the movies without having to sit and watch that."

Terrell Falk, a spokeswoman for Cinemark, says the practice of packaging ads with movie trailers has been going on for decades in Europe. In the past, she says, American audiences were cool to the idea of seeing commercials in theaters, but they are growing to accept them the way European audiences have.

"Older people typically object more," Falk says. "Kids, on the other hand, or (those in the) 12- to 34-year-old group, they've grown up with television and it doesn't really bother them."

Falk stresses that Cinemark, which runs the theaters at Gateway Mall, runs its advertisements only before the scheduled show times. Trips to both theaters confirmed that, for the most part, commercial programming did indeed begin and end before the posted start times.

Cinema World was less exact about starting its advertisements early, starting them both before and after the scheduled show times.

Locally, screened children's movies are not immune from pre-show advertising.

While Cinemark showed fewer ads than normal during its screening of "Dr. Seuss' The Cat in the Hat," Cinema World led its showing with two public service announcements, five movie trailers and 10 com- mercials.

Not everyone is bothered by pre-movie promos. Meni Hai, 24, an Israeli exchange student at the University of Oregon who until recently worked in a movie theater in Jerusalem, says advertising is just part of going to the movies. In Israel, he says, the standard arrangement is to show two product advertisements and three film trailers.

"I don't think it (the pre-show entertainment) is supposed to be long," Hai said. "I don't think it should be more than 15 minutes (long)."

One of the few locally screened Hollywood movies to start before the 15-minute mark was a Cinemark showing of "The Cat in the Hat," which featured a 14 1/2 -minute windup.

At Eugene's art house theater, the Bijou Art Cinemas, ads are not even an issue. The two-screen cinema shows three to four trailers and zero commercials before its indie movies.

The theater does project slides advertising local businesses and artists before the lights go down, but the average pre-show at the Bijou runs eight minutes, manager Louise Thomas says.

"Besides the fact that I know our customers would hate it (commercial advertising), I've never been approached by Coke."

If the Bijou is the least commercial theater in town, Cinema World may be the most ad saturated. Based on a small sample of films screening at both Cinema World and Cinemark 17, Cinema World movies tended to include more advertising.

The protest movement

While filmgoers who are fed up with advertising would seem to have little recourse, there are a number of national organizations that have sprung up in recent years.

In addition to the aforementioned Portland group, a Web site called Stop Pre-Movie Ads - found at www .shinybluegrasshopper.com/nomovieads/ - lists ad-free movie theaters by state. A group called Commercial Alert is asking viewers to speak the words "no commercials" when a pre-movie ad is shown on screen.

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader wants theaters to be required by law to start listing the actual start times of the films. And there's a class action lawsuit pending against the Loews Theater chain that alleges consumer fraud on the part of the company.

"In business, nothing is set in stone," says Jason Thompson, director of the Captive Motion Picture Audience of America. "If theaters and studios see that their bottom lines are being adversely affected rather than enhanced by ad placement, they will re-evaluate their practices."

Lewis Taylor can be reached at 338-2512 or ltaylor @guardnet.com.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not just the quantity, it's the quality

December 19, 2003

It's not just quantity, but also the ad quality

It isn't just the number of pre-movie ads that bothers some local film fans, but the type of ads being shown.

One common complaint is that many of the commercials being screened in the theater are the same ones being shown on television. Ads for GoArmy .com, Samsung and MasterCard are now showing both in theaters and at home.

"Those ads, they don't look good on the big screen, because I think they're just projected video," says Paul Dergarabedian, president of the Los Angeles box office tracker Exhibitor Relations.

"They (advertisers) may start either making the quality of these TV spots look nicer or actually creating spots primarily to be shown in theaters, making them more cinematic."

Video game makers have started doing just that, hiring the people who make movie previews to make their ads. And they've been screening these more cinematic ads both in theaters and on TV, says Eric Archer, an editor at the Ant Farm, a Los Angeles company that produces film trailers.

Ant Farm recently started making movie-style previews for other products, such computer games.

Since many viewers enjoy trailers but don't like the product ads, videogame makers may have hit upon a successful strategy. The "coolness" quotient of trailers seems only to be increasing, says Archer, who has edited trailers for "Love Actually" and the latest remake of "Peter Pan."

"Trailers used to be more of just a coming attraction. They've evolved into almost self-contained works in and of themselves, which are sometimes even events.

"Trailers for `The Lord of the Rings' trilogy or `The Matrix' trilogy or any of the `Star Wars' films, people - at least here in Los Angeles - will line up to see a movie, just because those trailers will be playing beforehand. That's definitely not something that happened 10 years ago."

Terrell Falk, a spokeswoman for Cinemark, would like to see product advertisements that screen in theaters attain a similar kind of following. In Europe, where pre-movie advertising is a common occurrence, she says theater ads have already earned such a cachet.

"The theater ads there - they're different than what you'd see anywhere else," Falk says. "They're like Super Bowl ads; they're special.

"Once the advertising industry understands, `Oh, this (theater advertising) is like doing a Super Bowl thing,' then I think it (will) be even more accepted."

- Lewis Taylor

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chains: It's a survival issue

December 19, 2003

Chains: It's a survival issue
By Lewis Taylor
The Register-Guard

While smaller theaters such as Eugene's Bijou Art Cinemas can survive without programming commercials before their films, the big theater chains say they've been forced find other revenue streams - and that includes selling ad space.

"What we have is a wonderful facility, but it's a box, and we don't own the product; we have to lease the product," says Terrell Falk, a spokeswoman for Cinemark. "We don't own those movies, we don't have any part of it. We are just renting it. And in turn, you pay us to see it (the movie) in our beautiful box, but there is a big cost to rent that (movie)."

Not only do the multiplexes have high overheads, but they also don't earn much money during opening weekend, says Paul Dergarabedian, president of the box office tracker Exhibitor Relations. The arrangement varies from film to film and studio to studio, but in some cases theater chains must fork over as much as 80 percent of what they rake in at the box office.

"I think there's a misconception on the part of moviegoers that when a film makes $80 million in its opening weekend, that a big part of that is going to the theater, but it's not," Dergarabedian says.

"The reason a studio gets their money back first is because they ponied up the money for the marketing and the production budget. As time goes on - it's a sliding scale - the theaters start getting a bigger percentage of the box office as the film plays."

Compounding the problem: Many national giants still are hurting from a theater building boom in the 1990s that left many of them carrying more debt than they could handle, says Brandon Gray, a box office analyst for Box Office Mojo.com.

As a result, at least a dozen chains filed for bankruptcy in 2001-02, including Regal Cinemas, which operates the Cinema World multiplex in Eugene.

"They actually shot themselves in the foot, because more theaters meant that more people could see movies in the opening weekend, and that's when the studios get the biggest cut of the grosses," Gray says.

"The movies open absolutely everywhere (and) people don't have to wait for them anymore. If you go to the theater it's, `Oh, I missed the 9 o'clock. Well, there's a 9:15 starting.'

"It's very rare that you'll get an absolute sell out."

With big movies such as "The Last Samurai" and "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" showing locally on at least four screens, it's easy to see what Gordon is talking about. But some consumer advocates say the money woes of big chains doesn't excuse the fact that captive, paying audiences are being subjected to TV-style commercials they weren't expecting.

"Theaters are not placing ads as entertainment for their customers," says Jason Thompson of Portland's Captive Motion Picture Audience of America. "They are placing them as a desperate effort to fund the mistakes of their overexpansion and bad business practices.

"Theaters and studios have a mutually beneficial relationship. If the theaters are struggling, they need to renegotiate these relationships rather than holding their audiences captive to unwanted messages."

Regal, the country's largest chain, is hoping to short-circuit some of the criticism coming from viewers with a 20-minute pre-show that takes the place of pre-movie ads and makes no bones about what it is.

Dubbed "The 2wenty," the program starts roughly 20 minutes before show time and includes entertainment, news shorts, music videos and ads. The 2wenty already has started showing in some Portland theaters, and may debut at Cinema World sometime in 2004.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 12-20-2003 04:46 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
at [Regal] Cinema World 8, the same film begins with 23 minutes of pre-feature promos.
And to think, one of the reasons circuits gave when they stopped buying cartoons was they didn't have time for them.
quote:
"Those ads, they don't look good on the big screen, because I think they're just projected video,"
That's right, they are video transfers to 35mm, which look like crap. One of the policies we institued when we formed Screen Attractions was quality would be our top priority. We flat out refuse to do videotape transfers. No need for it, especially since 99% of those commercials are shot on film to begin with! We just produce straight to 35mm, no fuss, no muss.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 12-20-2003 06:54 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And to think, one of the reasons circuits gave when they stopped buying cartoons was they didn't have time for them.

Yah... maybe... but the revenue stream was going the wrong way... most likely a problem for the chains! [Roll Eyes]

Besides, back in '87, when we stopped booking 'toons, the local depot only had a few Looneys and some old Woody Woodpecker titles around. The prints were shot and started repeating within 5 or 6 weeks. At $25/week/screen... well... I confess. I kept the money & bought me a better grade of hamburger to eat!

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 12-20-2003 07:04 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cinemark starts all ads before the showtime? Um yeah, ok. I do follow this rule because these ads are so ridiculous. However, the majority of the people running our booth start the ads at the listed showtime or even later. I think ads are terrible for the theater business. It is another one of those things that will drive business away. Why can't we walk into Lord of the Rings, hearing Howard Shore's score, then the lights dim, a film trailer or two play, then sound snipes, then the feature. It's just all terribly [puke]

AJG

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.