|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Sex For One in the theatre (you know, like Paul Reubens)
|
Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000
|
posted 08-03-2003 11:20 AM
Pee Wee at THE MATRIX
Pee Wee at The Matrix
Punch occasionally likes to get in touch with his inner geek. Punch also believes that the actual "work" part of holding a job is a major nuisance. So last week Punch decided to blow off said job for an afternoon showing of The Matrix: Reloaded at Tower City.
A bespectacled, pimply kid plopped himself down two seats away. Strange, considering the theater was nearly empty.
Stranger yet was the rustling sound coming from the kid's seat. It started during the sex scene between Neo and Trinity. Any Pee Wee Herman suspicions faded, however, when the sound continued through completely sexless action sequences. Surely the boy had nothing more than a bad itch.
But as soon as Italian model/actress Monica Bellucci sauntered onto the screen in a skintight cocktail dress, the sound intensified. Peripherally, it was impossible to locate the kid's hand . . . until . . . oh, dear God! . . . Punch's worst fears were confirmed.
The whole episode made Punch nostalgic for the sci-fi dorks of yesteryear. Hell, Shatner got tons of alien ass, but you never saw Trekkies whipping out their wands during the matinee.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 08-07-2003 11:17 PM
There's certainly nothing wrong with masturbation, but there is something wrong with masturbating publicly. I hope people were kidding when they didn't make that distinction.
As for the seats, after the Trans-Lux East in NYC played an extended run of Caligula (I think it played for well over a year), they ripped the seats out and changed the name of the theatre to the Gotham.
The restrictions in leases for films rated NC-17 are ridiculous. Films that are strictly porno are generally not submitted to the MPAA, so they don't have an NC-17 or X rating (and the MPAA has used NC-17, not X, for many years precisely because they never copyrighted the "X" rating and the porn industry adopted it by using XXX.) I can understand a restriction on placing an explicit poster for an NC-17 film in a public area of the mall, but not on restricting what people pay to see in a theatre.
There have been serious, well-made films that do have explicit sex and have either been rated NC-17 or not rated, such as the recent "Y Tu Mama Tambien" and "Sex with Lucia".
Why are we so afraid of sex but we couldn't care less about violence? A film can show hundreds of people being murdered in the most violent fashion and no one bats an eye and many bring their kids, but if a penis or vagina is shown, everyone freaks out.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|