|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: One-Sheet Typos
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 12-01-2006 10:44 AM
quote: Martin Brooks You sound very angry. I suspect this is because you feel that those you deem "unqualified" are taking work away from you.
Martin, you're missing the point. My disgust over this issue doesn't come from any personal situation. I'm doing just fine.
The problem is the graphic design field used to be a respectable profession. That's no longer the case. These days the general public just pisses all over it, thinking that graphic design is an easy job and that anyone can do it since computers are involved.
The Beatles and Bob Dylan don't work at all as a comparison. Guys like Bob Dylan and John Lennon had lots of talent. There's a lot of people trying to do graphic design that have no talent at all. But they're doing it anyway since the computers are making the art.
Most people can recognize good music when they hear it and even identify some of the elements that make the music work well. They know bad music and especially bad singing when they hear it, and often are not afraid to confront it with laughter and ridicule. The same doesn't hold true on knowing good graphic design from bad, much less spotting any of the elements that makes a design go bad. The creators of bad graphic design are rarely, if ever, confronted about the poor quality of their work either. Most laypersons don't have the guts to tell them the work looks terrible.
quote: Martin Brooks There are still plenty of people who get paid quite well to create great design. A look at any of the design annuals that are published proves that fact.
The design annuals of Print and How is not what the general public sees in their everyday lives.
Pick up your average local newspaper. Outside of major publications, most look like shit these days. Even some of the big ones look bad as well.
Drive through commercial districts in any American city and you'll see lots of really crappy looking signs and billboards. Even a lot of major retailers have unremarkable signs. Decades ago American businesses both large and small took more pride in how their stores looked from the road. That sort of thing is more rare today.
These visual problems would not exist in so many areas if: 1. all the people doing the work had any talent or aptitude for the job. 2. all the people doing the work understood basics of handling type, color, visual communications & problem solving skills one would gain from taking classes or at least reading books on the subject.
None of that is going to happen while the current level of disrespect for the graphic design profession continues -and has people stooping to defend the mediocrity resulting from all the amateur hour design.
Here's a pretty good website lampooning this subject: http://www.baddesignkills.com
The site has a lot of visual "propaganda" designed to ridicule bad design. I like this mock up of an Adobe software box:
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 12-01-2006 04:03 PM
I can understand some of what Bobby complains about, because I have known a lot of people who weren't cut out for computer programming, and were not capable of making it in college, and several years ago a shockingly large percentage of them were calling themselves "graphics designers". They were basically unemployed college drop-outs not capable of holding a steady job and went around looking for "Photoshop" work and took anything they could get. During the "dot com" boom, it was very common. Designing graphics and web pages were the thing to do for all these guys who couldn't seem to do anything else. This gave the field of computer graphics design a bad rap because in many people's minds, the term "computer graphics designer", instead of being associated with professionals with experience, invoked the thoughts of inexperienced college drop-outs trying to take advantage of a trend.
For a professional in that field, I could see it as being infuriating.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|