Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Zack and Miri pulled from Utah theatres (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Zack and Miri pulled from Utah theatres
Anslem Rayburn
Master Film Handler

Posts: 476
From: Yuma, AZ, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 11-08-2008 04:59 AM      Profile for Anslem Rayburn   Email Anslem Rayburn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
quote: Chad Souder
There is sodomy, which is still on the books in many states as illegal.
The joke goes: 90% of Americans who have had sex have tried out oral sex. The other 10% are liars.

What does oral sex have to do with sodomy?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-08-2008 08:23 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
But as others have mentioned... why does he regret it? Surely, it couldn't have something to do with the fact that he missed out on big $$ since it was a morality decision
More likely that he has since seen the film and didn't find it offensive. Money is certainly NOT a factor with Larry. If you had his net worth which is in the Billions it wouldn't matter to you either. It was more than likely having the word "Porno" in the title that stopped them from playing the film. At Jordon Commons which has been either the first or second highest grossing Disney location in the USA and considering the ultra conservative folks that go there mainly with their kids.... Its easy to see why they didn't want the word "Porno" on their Marquee for all the little kids to enquire about... Had it been another title without the word in it they'd have played it! They are playing "Saw" which is not exactly light hearted fare...

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-08-2008 09:18 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
Its easy to see why they didn't want the word "Porno" on their Marquee for all the little kids to enquire about... Had it been another title without the word in it they'd have played it!
So put it up as "Zack and Miri". Concerned about marketing materials? Tape over the word and/or replace it with "Video". Next excuse?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-08-2008 09:37 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...and the film company is taking exactly that tack. The most recent ads for the film just show the title as "Zack and Miri."

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 11-09-2008 04:28 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Anslem Rayburn
What does oral sex have to do with sodomy?
Sodomy can include oral sex.

According to the dictionary it means
1. anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex.
2. copulation with a member of the same sex.
3. bestiality

 |  IP: Logged

Anslem Rayburn
Master Film Handler

Posts: 476
From: Yuma, AZ, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 11-09-2008 11:26 AM      Profile for Anslem Rayburn   Email Anslem Rayburn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, you learn something new every day!

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-17-2008 12:05 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Zack And Miri Make A Really, Really Naughty Movie has been slapped with an 'R' certificate here meaning no-one under 18 years of age can see it*.

If it wasn't going to do badly enough before, this should see it into an early grave.

*Until they can rent it from the DVD store.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 11-17-2008 12:40 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On his weekly podcast, Smith was talking about how in Pennsylvania, they did not allow the billboards because the stick figure drawing would gain the attention of children, who would then inquire as to the meaning of the word "porno." So Smith suggested that they use "Zack and Miri" as the title (without "porno") on those billboards, and they were still denied permission. Where's the sense in that?

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-17-2008 08:54 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When it comes to people's attitudes toward sex, Mike, none of it makes any sense.

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Potts
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 159
From: Anderson, SC, USA
Registered: Sep 2008


 - posted 11-17-2008 12:16 PM      Profile for Tyler Potts   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In SC all the commercials called it "Zack & Miri." While I felt it was fine, honestly, I think it got away with a lot with an R. I remember in high school someone fast forwarding to all the nude scenes in Showgirls and I really don't see anything much different from that NC-17 flick to this. Times are changing I guess.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.