|
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Idiots who text at the movies
|
|
|
Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 02-12-2009 06:56 PM
quote: Chris Slycord And you say that kicking someone out solves nothing with respect to the distraction? Umm... it does stop the distraction from continuing.
Yes, but again, the distraction has already occurred then magnified. We're going around and around here. Your idea of kicking people out after the fact will not work. It is not working. Yes, it stops that individual from further texting during that movie, but that is all it guarantees. The only long-term effect it has (and I repeat here) is making people look around to see if anyone is watching.
I have to believe the majority of theatre managers don't just sit by and allow texting - yet it is problematic enough to warrant a newspaper article. The reason is (repeating again) it is too difficult to monitor all auditoriums of a multiplex at all times. It would take too much payroll. Texting is not like any other auditorium distraction we have ever experienced and therefore is not likely to be minimalized by any other method we have previously tried. Having a cell phone check or using a blocking device are extremes, but until someone here can recommend a reasonable, feasible solution that has a worthy effect, I hold they would be the best. That being said, neither will ever happen, so it is kind of pointless. We'll just keep warning people and kicking them out and having it distract everyone else.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 02-13-2009 04:24 PM
I don't think there's an easy solution. Not allowing cell phones and checking people at the door will drive many customers away, and would require a level of search (searching women's purses and all clothing pockets) that customers would find unacceptable. Many people would take the search as a challenge and come up with ways to get them in.
When I go to the movies, I don't want to be contacted once I'm inside the auditorium. However, since I got my phone, I don't wear a watch, so my cell phone is used as my watch more than anything since I get so few calls. I carry it with me, either in a pocket or clipped on my belt and would resent being told I couldn't bring it in. It's always set to silent in the auditorium and I'd never answer it, text on it, or talk on it in there. It can keep track of incoming calls and when I leave, I can see if I missed any (rarely) on the way out. Pulling the phone out and looking at the time displayed on it (using it as a watch) does not require opening it or lighting it up in any way to cause a distraction.
That being said, nobody else seems to think anything of pulling the phones out and opening them (lighting up the bright little screens) during the show. It's become as much of an epidemic as the use of AutoTune on current top 40 music.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007
|
posted 02-23-2009 04:49 PM
A cell phone check, like a coat check, if that's what you mean, would depend on voluntary action, much like compliance to the already existing cell phone rules. A cell phone search would be extremely intrusive, and you wouldn't have many customers after long. Creating interference to block the device is illegal. Those are the only proactive measures I've seen, and none of them are viable. I would really like to see a real solution to the problem, one that can be implemented in a multiplex, but it needs to be legal in more than a few jurisdictions, and can't piss off rule following patrons.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006
|
posted 02-24-2009 10:08 AM
Not Exactly Off Topic, But. . . .
Student Arrested for Refusing to Stop Texting in Class
A 14-year old girl in Wisconsin, USA has been arrested by the police after she ignored requests from her school teacher to stop sending text messages during a math lesson. She was later charged with disorderly conduct and will appear in court in April.
The police were called by the Wauwatosa East High School, and when confronted by the police she initially denied even owning a mobile phone. However, a search by a female police officer found the phone, concealed in a location more usually reserved for criminals in prisons - namely the "buttocks area".
The unnamed student was issued a criminal citation for disorderly conduct, which carried "a bail of $298," and had her phone confiscated.
The girl was also suspended from the school for a week, but sneaked back into school twice and was cited both times for trespassing.
Speaking to the local news reporter, the girl's father said that he supported the school's actions as his daughter had crossed the line.
"They were more than fair. They gave her a few chances, but for some reason she didn't abide by that," he said.
<sent to me by a friend, so source link is unavailable>
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|