Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Chicago woman arrested for video recording in a theatre (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Chicago woman arrested for video recording in a theatre
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-04-2009 10:37 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
Joe--I would immediately _start_ visiting any theatre that confiscated cell phones before allowing anyone into the auditorium. I'm really, really sick of people who use them in a rude manner. (I am not a cell phone owner, so perhaps I am biased on this.)
I own a cell phone, but despite that I really have a strong hatred toward cell phone use in a movie theater.

Warren Theaters has a zero tolerance policy on cell phone use. They have posters in the lobby declaring this policy and repeat the warnings in their pre-show program on screen. They won't confiscate an offender's phone, but they will eject him from the theater. I wish every movie theater was operated in that manner.

quote: Julio Roberto
Unless the camera is fitted with a polarizing filter, which, mind you, real pirates would use.
Real pirates use DVD screener discs and often get the movie duped en masse or uploaded to the Internet before the movie arrives in commercial theaters.

How many video cameras out there can be fit with a linear polarizer or circular polarizer filter anyway? I'm guessing not many.

quote: Julio Roberto
Well, real pirates would use a 2D version of the film or use two cameras to record a 3D version in all its glory, but that's a different matter.
A bootlegger might be able to get a somewhat unghostly looking image if he taped the screen using one camera aimed at the proper angle and a CP filter dialed in just right. I strongly doubt he would get any sort of useful 3D image by using two cameras in the auditorium. The digital 3D setups are more complicated in how they project 3D than something more straight forward like a dual 15/70 IMAX 3D show.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-04-2009 11:54 AM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Twilight New Moon opened Nov. 20, all the pirate recording was done on the first day or second day after opening. This event took place 10 days after opening, according to what I've read her recording would not be salable to counterfeiters as they already have it.

Sure the law allows her to be prosecuted, but the law is an ass as is the court.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 12-04-2009 12:28 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin McCaffery
but a good lawyer will rip that to pieces.
First you say that you haven't seen the text at all, so you have no clue how well (or poorly) written it is then you conclude that lawyers will tear it to shreds? So, I must assume that your conclusion is based on both your lack of knowledge as to what is in the statute and your lack of experience/education in law.

quote: Bill Enos
All these people are guilty--lock 'em up. Let the executions begin.
Except only one of them (the woman who did the recording) broke the law. You can't be guilty when no law was broken.

quote: Joe Redifer
It's because the MPAA has next to no power to stop piracy that they need to make a big deal out of this. They'll take all the table scraps they can get.
To be fair, the MPAA probably had no idea about this particular case until it was reported in the news and had nothing directly to do with this. The police representative said that the managers requested that charges be brought.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-04-2009 12:33 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
But the manager no doubt acted like he/she did due to the brainwashing of Valenti and company, and as such turned off their brain to deal with the situation.

I do not support piracy at all and have personally reported a few legitimate instances to the MPAA over the years, but as has been outlined over the last few pages here, there were plenty of other suitable ways to deal with this.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-04-2009 01:23 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
They won't confiscate an offender's phone, but they will eject him from the theater.
Awesome. Hats off to Warren Theaters. If you wear a hat, anyway. Hats are so 40's.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 12-04-2009 01:24 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As they say, "Any publicity is good publicity".

Whether or not anyone believes what this woman did was right or wrong, the incident achieves what the MPAA set out to do, that is to get the message out that if you even think of recording in a cinema auditorium, you have a very good chance of getting busted...and this bird got busted....and now it's in the news. Job done.

As an aside, if pirates get hold of screeners and do direct digi-dubs of these, wont there be flags or metadata id's that would identify the source? Sort of a built in CAPcode?

Ian

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-04-2009 01:27 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In response to Chris comment that only the woman was guilty, not so, a person who knowingly allows a felony to take place can be charged also, and these people should be if she is convicted of anything.
If she doesn't sue Muvico over this she is stupid.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 12-04-2009 01:34 PM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
How many video cameras out there can be fit with a linear polarizer or circular polarizer filter anyway? I'm guessing not many.
You'd be surprised. Most companies produce a glare filter which is just a glorified linear polarizer.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-04-2009 02:07 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The prevailing opinion here seems to be that not much piracy happens via camcording in theatres. Not true -- there really is quite a bit of it. We get a fairly long list from NATO every couple of weeks of where camcording was observed and stopped. I'm not saying screeners and in-house people aren't guilty, but they're not the whole problem.

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 12-04-2009 02:26 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
She didn't intend to break the law, but she did. Should she be charged with a felony for being a rude idiot? Probably not, but neither is she innocent of wrongdoing. I've encountered people who appeared to have camera phones pointed at screens, and I told them it was illegal and if they continued, the police would be involved. Being ignorant in 2009 of these sorts of issues should itself be a crime.

And, Bill, your argument that the establishment is responsible is ludicrous and a red herring. The theater would have been responsible if they had caught someone camming the screen and not done something about it. Selling a ticket to someone who does something illegal in the auditorium does not transfer responsibility to the seller, and if you think it does, you are plain wrong.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-04-2009 03:11 PM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If all pirated DVDs disappeared tonight, would the industry see a measurable sales increase? I'll bet not.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Tommassello
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 547
From: Coatesville, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 12-04-2009 03:20 PM      Profile for Joe Tommassello   Email Joe Tommassello       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought the most disturbing fact in the whole article was that the birthday "girl" was 29 years old and having a kiddie party at a Twilight screening. Maybe Chuck E. Cheese was all booked up!

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 12-04-2009 04:10 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The other thing that's being left unsaid here is you're putting it on the theatre manager to determine intent. MPAA guidelines are to let the person continue and contact the police, then let the police sort out intent.

I had a similar situation with a couple pre-teen girls who were recording Alvin and the Chipmunks on their phone. I contacted my home office for info on how to proceed and was told to contact the police. My boss contacted the MPAA and their investigator was ready to lock the kids up. When the parents got involved, it was all about how I was a jerk, without any thought to the fact the kids were doing something wrong. What happened to the day when parents would march their kid into face the store manager when they were caught stealing?

The flip side is that if I knew these girls were recording and didn't follow procedure, then my job is on the line if those captures show up on YouTube or MySpace. If not my job, then do I wind up liable for a civil suit based on the MPAA's perceived damages?

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 12-04-2009 04:58 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well said, Justin.

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 12-04-2009 06:17 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
How many video cameras out there can be fit with a linear polarizer or circular polarizer filter anyway? I'm guessing not many.
Video cameras that can be fitted with a polarizing filter? Most of them, of course. All of mine (about 7) have them. Most of the ones I know as well. Just order a polarizing filter (circular or linear, as needed) of the diameter of the filter thread (say 57mm) and have it delivered next day. Done. As cheap as $20 (more, if you want more quality, of course).

Not to mention you can just pop a filter from the 3D glasses and "tape it" in front of the camera. Vóila.

quote: Bobby Henderson
A bootlegger might be able to get a somewhat unghostly looking image if he taped the screen using one camera aimed at the proper angle and a CP filter dialed in just right.
Just to be sure, let me tell you that I speak of ACTUAL PROVEN EXPERIENCE besides theory. You can get a NO GHOST whatsoever (or similar to the ghosting level you get when you watch the film properly) by using a filter. You can even use the filter that comes in the 3D glasses, of course. As you said, the linear filter has to be rotated to the proper angle from the plate-retarder until the ghosting dissapears, but all circular filters for cameras allow for this. If you used the filter off a pair of 3D glasses, they are already pre-aligned.

quote: Bobby Henderson
I strongly doubt he would get any sort of useful 3D image by using two cameras in the auditorium. The digital 3D setups are more complicated in how they project 3D than something more straight forward like a dual 15/70 IMAX 3D show
About using 2 videocameras, each fitted with one filter from the 3D glasses i.e., it works, of course, equally as well. Again, I've tried and I can confirm. What makes you think that it's more "complex"? The fact that they flash 3 times per eye? It would be just the same as taping a 2D film (per camera) with a 3 blade shutter. No big deal, as long as the camera and film were both 24p/48i/72p.

Needless to say I did this under the current laws in my country, with no copyright infringement, and to atest with certainty that it's BS when the industry claims that 3D can not be "pirated" or "projected/used at home".

I can guarantee, beyond any reasonable doubts, that you can do both today w/o too much trouble. The worst problem is the low light levels from DLP projectors in 3D (after the polarizing filters) and that non-24p cameras, specially CMOS, flicker a bit (actual flicker, not ghosting, which you get "none") with the 72hz (per camera/eye) refresh due to the rolling shutter of the CMOS and total blanking interval of the DLP during the switch. This shouldn't happen on 24p CCD cameras, but I didn't have any 24p CCD camera to test, but did have a pair of 50i CCD and 24p CMOS.

So I hope this is the end of the debate about "with 3-D, you can't pirate off the screen or have 3D at home". That's not true. Even the cameras that I've used for years for home 3D recording, a pair of small PAL JVC GR-DVP7, would allow for "fine 3D pirating" inside a movie theater.

At best, you can say it is slightly more inconvenient for a pirate/home viewer to pirate this way in 3D. That's all. And as easy as popping out a filter from the 3D glasses and taping it in front of the pirate's camera lense if you are ok with a 2D version.

But the easiest method to pirate movies continues to be ... to download them from the internet. No need for cameras and theaters ... [uhoh]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.