Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Fox Film Chief Stacey Snider Says Current Theatrical Windows Are ‘Anachronistic’ (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Fox Film Chief Stacey Snider Says Current Theatrical Windows Are ‘Anachronistic’
David Buckley
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 525
From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 02-19-2017 03:17 PM      Profile for David Buckley   Author's Homepage   Email David Buckley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike Schulz bang on the money:

quote: Mike Schulz
if they keep shortening the release windows. 3 or 4 months is just enough time to convince people that they need to watch a movie at the cinema (especially the tent pole films like Star Wars, etc.) but there are still a lot of people who don't feel the need to see a movie right away and are willing to wait a few months.
Stacey's right in that the the vast, vast majority of screen business is done in the first week or two, but that is only because The Gap gets people to watch product at the movie houses. Take away The Gap, and they, well, just wont pay the premium and they'll watch at home. And as Bobby continually points out, home systems have never been so good.

The real problem is that if The Suits break the golden egg, there really is no going back. The public will never go back to cinemas, and that's the end of the money stream that makes the movies. Netflix gets the win.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-19-2017 04:03 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
If studio heads shrink release windows down to a sort of "event horizon" point of no return it will be nothing short of a complete disaster for the movie theater business. The big chains like Regal, Cinemark, etc. will fold and they'll close down big city premiere-class theaters right along with the common suburban multiplex sites.
I agree the small art house theatres might be able to survive based on the loyalty of the art house crowd. However, I think the main first run theatres to survive will be flag ship locations in large population centers. With a larger population to pull from, these theatres are better able to absorb incremental losses to their business, especially as they become more of a destination as more small town theatres close.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-19-2017 05:34 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The big question is how many movie theaters need to stay in business to keep all the movie theater equipment suppliers in business? All of the companies that make projectors, cinema processors, speakers, theater seats, sconce lights, poster cases, etc. must build those products at some level of scale. They can't build that kind of stuff in one-off, two-off tiny quantities. There has to be enough theaters in business to keep those companies making stuff for that market.

A company like Dolby might still be able to continue making commercial level cinema processors if America's commercial movie theater market implodes. But they would be relying on almost all of their business going into the export market. Exporting is its own wildcard considering we could be lapsing into a freaking trade war with big countries like China. Dolby might see a bunch of doors slam shut on their business.

What kind of consequences could fall onto the theater business in other countries if America's theater business collapses? Many of those markets rely quite a bit on big budget American movies. If that supply of big budget content dries up it could be bad for thousands of theater screens in international markets even if they maintain various release windows.

As the suits in Hollywood keep shrinking the window between theatrical and home video release I just get more and more bearish on the future of America's entire movie industry. These bean counting executives either really don't seem to be aware of the kind of risk they're taking or they just don't care about it, living in complete denial. They're not seeing how this chess game could play out a dozen moves into the future. They have no idea how the contagion could spread if American movie theaters become a thing of the past.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-20-2017 08:38 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If America get a cold; Europe sneezes. This has been the case for at least 65 years. Add to that the fact that ownership of chains and studios is centering on Japan/China and that these folks are driven ONLY by bottom line.

I long for the days of bean counters; they would at least appreciate having beans in the future. We are beyond that now. Hence, the major reason I retired. I just lost the faith in responsible leadership.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-20-2017 10:54 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The movie industry had sort of an "oh shit" moment of panic when they finally realized once companies who made film related products, such as Kodak, went out of business that manufacturing capability would be gone forever. So they made some cursory effort to keep Kodak on life support and are now scrounging to keep at least some film projectors operational.

The situation is far more complicated and difficult with d-cinema product lines. Take the product lines for d-cinema projector lamps for instance. How many different models of d-cinema projector lamps are currently being produced? I imagine there is a fairly wide variety. But every lamp model needs a good base of installed projectors to be worth producing at all. Lamps are expensive enough as it is with many d-cinema systems currently in service. If that installation base dropped to a mere fraction the cost of those lamps would certainly get far more scary expensive.

The Hollywood studio suits are clearly taking movie theaters for granted. They think the theaters are always going to be there no matter how badly they erode the theaters' business model.

Lots of big, disruptive changes have taken place over the past 10 years. We've seen book stores and video rental stores vanish in many places. Big brands like Blockbuster Video and Waldenbooks are now gone. Physical media (books, CDs, DVDs, Blu-ray, etc.) could all become a thing of the past. Millions of Americans have ditched traditional land line phone service. Many are "cutting the cord," getting rid of traditional cable TV. How many people still send "snail mail" via the mailbox on their house or drop it in a USPS blue neighborhood mailbox? The Postal Service is having an ever more difficult time justifying its existence. Why spend a bunch of money on stamps when you send the same messages online instantly? Some of these big changes, like the demise of certain retailers, has been brought about by people looking for bargains (mainly online).

Movie theaters are not immune at all to these same disruptive changes. Movie theaters have been around for all of our lives. But the same goes for other businesses that now seem to be gasping their last dying breaths. Sears has been in business over 100 years and pioneered much of the modern business model of brick and mortar retail. Our Sears store in Lawton's Central Mall is going to close in March. I think the entire company will be lucky if it survives to see 2018.

If America's movie theater business fails I worry about how the fallout from that could spread to other kinds of brick and mortar businesses. Whether it's an obsolete 70's style mall or a newer "town center" plaza many shopping centers have a big movie theater as an anchor to attract customers after work, after dark and on the weekends. If theaters disappear it could lead to a major drop in foot traffic at these shopping centers. When people go shopping they often like to eat out and see a movie as part of that experience of getting out of the house. Without the entertainment option that just makes it easier to stay at home and order something from Amazon.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 02-20-2017 02:18 PM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
> Movie theaters have been around for all of our lives. But the same goes for other businesses that now seem to be gasping their last dying breaths.

100 years ago in February of 1917, almost every town and city in this country had at least one, if not more, blacksmith shops that fulfilled a community need. In my lifetime, I can not ever remember seeing an operating blacksmith shop. Mass production allowed for the ordering, either by a retailer or mail order, replacement parts for whatever you needed.

The movie production and exhibition business has been sacrificing it's future for short term profitably since the 1970's, when it all but abandoned the weekly family market for more adult (R Rated) entertainment. Like now, there were a lot of factors that went into that short sighted decision, such as home video and cable tv, but the long term results is that we now have almost 2 generations of people who were not brought up going to the movies on a regular basis. If movie theatres were to disappear, I don't think that the majority of people under 35 would even notice.

The problem that the exhibition industry faces now is that for many, there is no reason to go out to a theatre to see a movie. Those that care about presentation can do it better at home than many theatres, and those who don't tend to care only about the cost. The only thing theatres have going is the exclusive window. When that is gone, there are going to be a whole lot of locations going with them.

That said, some theatres will survive, and some of those will even run movies now and again. Unless, of course, the exhibition industry finds some way to remain relevant.

Finally, as stated above, there is an entire infrastructure required to produce the equipment and replacement parts needed for theatrical exhibition. Once that infrastructure is no longer economically viable, it is "The End - Made in Hollywood USA".

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-20-2017 03:43 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The strongest consumer argument for maintaining a strong exhibition industry will always be the ability to get out of the house and watch a movie without the distractions of home. Having the ability to pause, skip, rewind, and delay only makes it easier to be distracted while watching a movie. So even if the "big screen" argument is less important, there is still the case to be be made for simply getting out of the house.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-20-2017 04:44 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Exactly. Sadly the inmates are running the asylum.

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 02-20-2017 07:49 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been a loyal movie theater goer for decades ever since I was a little kid watching all kinds of movies and not just kids movies back in the day. I gotta say. The thrill is gone. When I watch a movie on Amazon Prime or netflix, sometimes, it is tough for me to even remember if this movie had a theatrical release or not. So this issue which was a bigger deal to me in the past is not resonating to me as much these days.

The media talent is diluted with some good writers and filmmakers lured to TV where there are just way too many TV shows being made. I can't even recognize half the titles you see on channels like FX, USA, etc.
As far as indie movies, I don't even bother watching them in the theater anymore as I get better quality on my TV than in some indie house with bad equipment.

As far as documentaries, I never understood why the distribution on cable tv is so bad. There is no reason to have a theatrical release for docs anymore other than the whole Oscar qualifying requirement.

The theater may be a place where we go to see the type of movie which requires a big screen to enjoy it to the max. I watched The Revenent on my 75 inch SONY and the scene where Leonardo falls off the cliff with the horse just didn't have the same impact as it did in the theater.

And yes, I agree with Bobby why the movie industry is slow to move to 4K or higher resolutions.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 02-20-2017 09:32 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There doesn't seem to be the sort of excitement around a movie now that there used to be. I remember when I played stuff like Toy Story (the first one) there was a real buzz and excitement around it; these days there doesn't seem to be as much excitement in the lobby as there used to be for that sort of thing. People are getting more and more jaded, I guess.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-20-2017 11:13 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Pravin Ratnam
I have been a loyal movie theater goer for decades ever since I was a little kid watching all kinds of movies and not just kids movies back in the day. I gotta say. The thrill is gone. When I watch a movie on Amazon Prime or netflix, sometimes, it is tough for me to even remember if this movie had a theatrical release or not. So this issue which was a bigger deal to me in the past is not resonating to me as much these days.
One big difference is Netflix and Amazon are not sinking upwards of $100 million or $200 million into the production budget of a single 2-hour movie. A bunch of their original movies are fairly low budget fare that would likely go direct to DVD anyway. They are collectively spending a lot of money on productions, but they're spreading most of that across a whole bunch of TV series projects.

quote: Frank Cox
There doesn't seem to be the sort of excitement around a movie now that there used to be. I remember when I played stuff like Toy Story (the first one) there was a real buzz and excitement around it; these days there doesn't seem to be as much excitement in the lobby as there used to be for that sort of thing. People are getting more and more jaded, I guess.
I think it's the Save the Cat curse among other things. Major movie studio executives are now having to answer to bosses in parent media holding corporations. Those guys aren't interested in taking any chances. They want to sell the same ideas over and over again. To make matters worse, they want these regurgitated and repackaged ideas to translate better to international audiences. That effectively means more explosions, less suspension of disbelief and far less witty banter. Humor and other kinds of amusing exchanges between characters can be lost in translation to audiences in China, Russia, etc.

Traditional 2-hour movies are growing more bland and predictable. The situation is bad enough that a movie that takes a few chances but is still overall a mediocre movie can be a sort of big sensation until people realize the movie isn't quite so great and they get sick of it. I figure this is why my movie buying habits over the past few years have dropped off to near zero.

quote: Mitchell Dvoskin
The movie production and exhibition business has been sacrificing it's future for short term profitably since the 1970's, when it all but abandoned the weekly family market for more adult (R Rated) entertainment.
Prior to the late 1970's I don't think there was any more in the way of real family oriented movies than in the decades following the 70's. Full length animated movies and other movies specifically geared for children were not all that common. Movies made before the mid 1960's may have had to follow rules of the Hays Code, but most of those "clean" movies were still very much geared for adult audiences.

 |  IP: Logged

James Wyrembelski
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 114
From: Beaverton, MI, USA
Registered: Sep 2015


 - posted 02-20-2017 11:13 PM      Profile for James Wyrembelski   Email James Wyrembelski   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I honestly do not understand how people even keep track of all the entertainment available to them. We still have cable and even a land line. I bet the land line gets more use from me than cable. I want to "cut the cord" on cable, but I can't convince my other half to do so...I think it's more of a comfort thing than anything....that "its always been there" so it would be weird without it.

Its rare I even watch any shows on TV...there's too many, and I honestly don't have the time between everything I do in the day to sit down and watch a series or sift through the same re-runs that have been going on for years in the same time slots. Netflix? Forget it...I got rid of it after saving things and finding them removed from streaming after a week or two. I watch the news online and that's about it. We go to the movies quite regularly and its about the only way I can keep track of whats out there and keep my sanity. Its also our excuse to get out of the house, especially in the winter months. In my opinion, there's just simply too much content anymore and I don't have the time for it...How does everyone else? I know I'm in the minority on this one.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 02-20-2017 11:29 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My home cinema has evolved to the point where it actually is better than any local cinema in the area save for sheer screen size. I have a sharper picture, more accurate color, typically better contrast due to proper masking at home, and sound that all the local theaters have forgot they are capable of producing.

It's not that our local cinemas can't be good, it's as if they refuse to be good. They settle for mediocrity. Sure, recliners, alcohol, and expanded food options are nice. But why pay for all of that and then get an absolutely abhorrent presentation that is letterboxed and lacks any sort engrossing sound?

I love the communal aspect of cinema so I will always prefer to see it in a cinema but operators are barely holding on to me because the value just is not there any longer.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 02-21-2017 12:56 AM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: James Wyrembelski
We still have cable
My cable tv is "free" since I'm the local quality control guy for the cable tv/internet company (among other things). I have something like 300 channels -- everything from Praise TV to Hustler -- and watch exactly none of it. I haven't watched television in years since there's always something more interesting to do. There is a good digital music selection through the cable box, though, so I play the "Seventies Channel" all day in my living room to keep my bird (and myself) entertained. But the channel setting on the box never changes otherwise, unless they call me to "check the picture on channel 198" or something like that.

I also take orders for service connections and most of the people who sign up these days are interested only in Internet service and don't want the TV service even when it's offered with a limited time discount. There's less and less interest in cable tv and I don't have to wonder why since the price of that can get up to an amazing amount, especially if you want any of the specialty channels or sports.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 02-21-2017 12:00 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Lamps are expensive enough as it is with many d-cinema systems currently in service. If that installation base dropped to a mere fraction the cost of those lamps would certainly get far more scary expensive.

A few days ago, I had a tech suggest that, as the industry moves toward laser, lower demand might increase the cost of xenon lamps and quality might decrease. That was interesting to me because, while I could see converting one of my machines, I had no plans to (ever) convert the others... couldn't see the cost penciling out.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.