|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Meet the Lone Loser in MoviePass Hitting 1 Million Members
|
|
|
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-13-2019 04:25 PM
And That's a Wrap Variety quote: MoviePass Shuts Down, With Parent Company Citing Failure to Raise Funds For more than a year, MoviePass has had trouble keeping the lights on. Just before the July 4 holiday, it said it was suspending service for several weeks in order to fix technical issues and finish work on a new version of its app. In August, it claimed to have restored service to “a substantial number of our current subscribers.”
Meanwhile, also last month, MoviePass confirmed that a security issue may have left customers records exposed online, including credit card info.
In August 2018, MoviePass eliminated the popular one-movie-per-day plan, priced at $9.95 per month — an offer that proved to be economically unsustainable. It replaced that with a new $9.95 plan letting subscribers see just three movies each month, but that evidently was not a viable path to profitability either. This year, it rolled out a refashioned “unlimited” option, for $14.95 per month, to again allow customers to see one movie daily but warning that movie choices would be restricted based on “system-wide capacity.”
For full-year 2018, Helios and Matheson’s net loss more than doubled, to $329.3 million, on revenue of $232.3 million, according to its most recent financial filing. The company acquired control of MoviePass in 2017. Helios and Matheson’s shares were delisted from the Nasdaq on Feb. 12, 2019, after its stock price failed to meet the exchange’s $1-per-share minimum requirement, and have been available in over-the-counter trading.
Helios and Matheson is being investigated by the New York Attorney General, which is looking into whether the company misled investors. The company also is the target of a class-action lawsuit by MoviePass subscribers claiming the change in the “unlimited” plan was a deceptive “bait-and-switch” tactic.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-17-2019 07:24 AM
Just Stay Dead Variety quote: Former MoviePass Chairman Ted Farnsworth Trying to Buy Failing Subscription Company By BRENT LANG Brent Lang Brent Lang Executive Editor of Film and Media @https://twitter.com/BrentALang
Ted Farnsworth, the financier who helped set in motion MoviePass’s meteoric rise and precipitous fall, has submitted an offer to purchase the beleaguered subscription service and its parent company, Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc.
Financial terms of the offer were not disclosed, but Farnsworth, who served as Helios’ chairman and chief executive officer is also looking to buy MoviePass Films, a film production company that the company started in 2018, as well as Moviefone, the movie listing and information service it bought that same year.
The offer comes four days after Helios and Matheson announced it was shuttering the money-hemorrhaging service. Many subscribers had already fled, as the company experimented with different pricing models in a bid to survive. At its height the company boasted 3 million customers.
In order to avoid any conflicts of interest, Farnsworth said he had stepped down from his roles at the company and from his position on the board of directors. He did not reveal how he had put together his financing or the members of his investment group.
“I believe there is great unrealized value in MoviePass and we want to rebuild and make sure it reaches its full potential,” Farnsworth said in a statement. “I have always believed in the business model and the brand [former MoviePass CEO] Mitch Lowe and I built at MoviePass. There’s tremendous appetite for movie theater ticket subscription.”
Lowe and Farnsworth made headlines with an aggressive pricing model that they unveiled in 2017 after Helios and Matheson, a data company of little renown, bought a controlling stake in MoviePass. The pair announced that they were slashing MoviePass’s monthly fee from nearly $50 to $9.95, enabling moviegoers to see a movie-a-day for a month. That was less than the cost of a ticket in cities such as New York or Los Angeles, but Farnsworth and Lowe argued that the data they collected on customers would be so valuable they would be able to sell that to studios and turn a profit. They also hoped to win over theater owners, convincing them to cut a deal by proving that they could drive customers to their screens.
The plan didn’t work out and instead MoviePass burned through hundreds of millions of dollars before Helios and Matheson was eventually delisted from the Nasdaq. It is also being investigated for securities fraud by the New York Attorney General for securities fraud and faces several class action lawsuits.
It did help trigger a subscription revolution in the exhibition space. The country’s three largest theater chains, AMC, Regal, and Cinemark, all have unveiled subscription plans for customers as they looked for ways to boost attendance and compete with MoviePass.
Farnsworth, a Miami-based businessman, has an unorthodox resume. He has been involved in everything from energy drink ventures to psychic hotlines. Lowe was an executive at Netflix in the company’s early days.
“Despite the reams of pulp fiction that have been written about MoviePass, we know what went wrong along the way and the many things that went right, “ Farnsworth said in a statement. “After all, we built the fastest growing subscription business in the history of merchandising and numerous copycats are out there now trying to capitalize on our model in the theater industry.”
By the time that MoviePass closed down, its financial situation was dire.Helios and Matheson’s net loss more than doubled in 2018 to $329.3 million, according to its most recent financial filing.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 21 pages: 1 2 3 ... 18 19 20 21
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|