Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Do Sub-titles Make A Difference? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Do Sub-titles Make A Difference?
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 10-14-2001 09:17 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heh heh. Regarding Princess Mononoke, some reviewers in Japan had problems with Ishida Yuriko's performance as "San" the titular princess. Ishida-san is a popular live-action actress, mostly doing TV "trendy dramas", what we in the US would call soap operas. Some people thought her line readings were too modern, that they weren't savage enough to be convincing as an atavistic (San looks like a Jomon-era girl but the story takes place in the Muromachi period; she's out of place by around 1400 years) warrior girl raised by wolves. My Japanese ability isn't good enough to pick up on such nuances--but I still enjoyed the original dialog much more than the English dub. I know sometimes dubs can be very good (Das Boot in English and Porco Rosso in French come to mind) and sometimes they can be hilarious, even if unintentionally. But to me most dubs end up being in the vast, unsatisfying middle ground. So yes, give me subtitles over dubs any day! But my opinion is probably in the great minority as far as US movie audiences go. So what else is new?

BTW despite mostly glowing reviews Mononoke tanked badly in the US, whereas in Japan it is now the third highest grossing film in that country's history. Yet Disney/Miramax refused to release Mononoke in subtitled form in the US, fearing the factor being described in this thread--that people would stay away in droves. So they gave the film barely more than an art house release, and in so doing probably contributed to the very result they were worried about; I think the probability is that art house patrons are more likely to avoid dubbed films. Giving the film only a half-hearted promotional push didn't help either. Oh well, at least we now have the R1 DVD with the option to play the Japanese tracks. But even there Disney originally planned to include only the English and French tracks with closed captioning. Only after a massive letter-writing campaign on the part of Studio Ghibli's North American fans in the Spring of 1999 did Disney re-evaluate their decision regarding the R1 DVD tracks and subtitles.

Next month Buena Vista Japan will release Mononoke on R2 DVD (yeah, The Mouse owns the video distribution rights to Studio Ghibli's films even in Japan). And guess what? It will have English subtitles available even though this is a Japanese domestic release. Sheesh!

Oops, I'm ranting again. Off my soapbox now...

Paul

 |  IP: Logged

Don Sneed
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Texas City, TX, USA
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 10-14-2001 09:59 PM      Profile for Don Sneed   Author's Homepage   Email Don Sneed   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When Star Wars II open here in Japan a couple of years ago, the opening scene which explane the what has happen before the movie scene start, you all know what I trying to say, well the sub-title in Japanese was off to the right side & just a little on the masking, (we have some strange screen sizes here & the lenses is just a little over size to fit the screen) with the sub-title cutting off just barely, really not enough to make a bid deal over it...whoooaa weeeee I thought I was going to be caine, shot or go to jail because of it, it is a big deal over here, but after the opening scene all sub-titles were at the bottom of the screen...the theatre had been open about a year or so before Star Wars II & they never had that problem before or since, well until the Star Wars II comes out....The theatre was upset, but they did not want to go to a smaller size picture due to changing the lens and/or picture size, so they left it alone, all was forgiven !!

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 10-14-2001 10:35 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I could never understand why people hate subtitled films. (Talk about judging a book by it's cover!) After watching for a few minutes, I sort of feel like I'm really hearing the actors say what is written.

I really disliked the english dub of Das Boot. While some of the actors know english and did a good job dubbing their own lines, it still looked like the "joke" of a japanense horror movie dubbed to english. I switched it back to german w/ english subtitles. The lips just don't match!

On the other hand, the reader of subtitles is at the mercy of the translater. A friend already had a DVD of Iron Monkey he got last year. The translations were not-so-good. They did a much better job for the new film release.


 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 10-14-2001 11:09 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Star Wars II????????

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 10-14-2001 11:19 PM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have to say I agree with James and many others here. I think dubbing is ridiculous. If I want to see a film, I want to see that film shown in the way it was intended to be shown, period. That means in its original language and in its original aspect ratio.

I ran into a weird thing the other day though. i showed a restored print of the Umbrellas of Cherbourg. I am almost positive that the film was shot in the 1.66 aspect ratio. The restored print from zeitgeist was hard matted 1.85 though. I guess I've seen this in other US released foreign films, but it seems strange to cater so completely to the theatres that don't have the equipment, initiative, or respect to show the 1.66 aspect ratio. They could have at least printed the original 1.66 image and subtitled for 1.85. Umbrellas looked fine, but many films would not.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 10-14-2001 11:48 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's an old arguement: Do you format the film as the director intended, or format it so it looks best in the ratio most theaters have?

Good reasons on both sides, but I think I'd rather have my film look good to the most people. So I'd just make it 1.85 or scope.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-15-2001 02:23 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting that no one has brought up the "subtitled projection done wrong" argument. About 6-8 years ago there was this toilet known as the Promenade in Dallas that would show Hong Kong films on the weekends at midnights. The movies were great, but the theater was hands down the biggest dump I've ever been in and they had projection to match (no fault of the projectionist, though). The HK films would run in their "big" (cough, cough) screen and had horrible keystoning going on in two directions. The keystoning not only was annoying from a standpoint of reading the subtitles, but the projectionist had to focus on the subtitles which resulted in the action in the top third of the screen running out of focus. This doesn't even get into the "Evans' Syndrome" of the 1.85 fixed aspect ratio, since most of these movies were shot in scope. There's nothing like having the subtitles run off of the screen where you miss the first and last few words on each line! I would have much preferred seeing those films at that theater dubbed so that the action in the top part of the screen could have been focused better and I could've known ALL of what was being said. Oh well, we didn't go there for the presentation anyway. For the record though, I cast my vote for subtitles.

(And believe it or not, the projectionist at that theater is with us here. )


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-15-2001 08:39 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I much prefer subtitles to a poorly-dubbed film.

When I saw a "Film Done Right" presentation of "Dances With Wolves" in Tokyo in October 1991, the print had English dialog, Japanese sub/side titles, and the original English subtitles when Lakota was being spoken.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-16-2001 02:28 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like the French system whereby a cinema will usually show the 'Version Originale' at the early evening show and a 'Version Francaise' at the later performance (sometimes subtitled, sometimes dubbed).

It means that if you can speak the language in which the film was originally shot then you don't have to put up with graffiti all over the screen. If you can't, then there is the option of a translated show. The drawback, of course, is double the number of prints, though a Bordeaux cinema owner I met last year said that UIP were starting to ship two sets of DTS discs with a single print (so you just insert the original or dubbed soundtrack as required). Obviously this is no good if you don't have DTS or if you want subtitles.

A laser subtitling system would get round this problem (presumably you could have the subtitle text digitally encoded on the print in some way) but to my knowledge no-one could has yet come up with one. Another advantage would be that you could run descriptive subtitles for the deaf on some shows at virtually no extra expense.

 |  IP: Logged

Steven Gorsky
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 146
From: Frederick, MD, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 10-16-2001 03:53 AM      Profile for Steven Gorsky   Author's Homepage   Email Steven Gorsky   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DTS makes a subtitling system using a special player and projector. More info can be found at DTS's website.

Steven Gorsky


 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 10-16-2001 08:19 AM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most of my customers are very used to sub-titles and it varies market to market due to release patterns. In Latin America sub-titles are common while in Spain the same film will probably be dubbed.....dubbing in Germany is generally excellent.
DTS sub-title system is also aimed for the film archive market. I am working with an archive which has 4000 prints and they have daily performances from this library in which they use a floppy with the text and a PC slaved by a time code generator attached to the projectors ( 10 to 20 minute reel changeovers )....this is an inperfect setup since changeovers, splices to prints etc causes timing errors....which they correct on the fly with advance / retard buttons on a contol box. DTS is working with a German audio equipment manufacturer to supply a machine or service in which DTS time code can be laser etched on to an existing print.....
As another side note, an associate has built an logging system using the DTS reader head to read advertising films as they are being projected as a proof to clients that their advertising money is being spent properly....simular concept as used to electronically log television ads......
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc www.tvpmiami.com

 |  IP: Logged

Kristin Wahlund
Film Handler

Posts: 92
From: Eagan, MN
Registered: Jul 2001


 - posted 10-16-2001 01:13 PM      Profile for Kristin Wahlund   Email Kristin Wahlund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks everyone for replying! My opinion is that when I go to a movie I don't like to have to read everything because then I don't even se the picture. It basically sucks.

------------------
Kristin Wahlund
Regal Cinemas
Eagan 16, MN

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 11-26-2001 07:15 AM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aw, Kristin! You should have been where I was this weekend. Amelie had no trouble selling out a 4:45 matinee in a New Jersey megaplex. Better yet, it was in an AMC.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-26-2001 08:07 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The more subtitled films you see, the easier it becomes to 'skim read' the subtitles very quickly and still spend 90% of the time watching the picture. I can understand that subtitles can be off-putting for audiences which don't see foreign-language films very often, though.

What's really annoying is when the subtitler actually changes the meaning of the original dialogue. A lot of that happened when 'Taxi' was released over here, presumably to help the film get a 15-certificate. In particular, screams of 'sacre merde' (literally, holy shit) during the Marseilles gun battle scene were subtitled as 'Oh No'. When I saw it all the French speakers were laughing like drains and everyone else was wondering what all the fuss was about.

BTW, in the days of silent film Hollywood editors were instructed to cut the length of intertitles so that they were on the screen for two seconds per word (useful to know, because from the length of an intertitle in feet and the number of words in the text you can work out the correct projection speed). Imagine how much it would slow things down if that rule were applied to subtitles today!

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 11-27-2001 07:11 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Once the theatre was rented to an Indian organization for a nine reel Bollywood musical filmed in Hindi in 1.66 format with English
subtitles. Only, the manager forgot to inform me! The patrons overran
everything, running the refreshment stands and forcing their way into
the booth, claiming they were delegations of cultural representatives
responsible for this all-important event.
Once the film started , "delegations" of young people born in the US
begged me to rack the image to show the titles so they could follow the story, even though, without the correct lens & aperture plate,
most of the heads would be cut off. That brought delegations of their
elders, blaming the young for being too lazy to learn their ancestral tongue, saying it was important to show all of their favorite actors,
not disrespect actors and elders by cutting heads.
After clearing the booth and locking the door, I compromisd by showing
heads during the lyrical dream sequence musical numbers, and showing
titles during the dramatic dialogue scenes. That really kept me
hopping! Of course, the manager and his staff had disappeared...
That's the only trouble I ever had with sub-titles. The Art Theatres
in Manhattan had full complements of lenses and aperture plates
for all formats, but theatres in the 'burbs didn't.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.