|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Windows ME keeps reboothing.
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 08-18-2002 12:14 AM
Mark, it looks like too many things could go wrong if SP3 is installed, but I am going to try it anyway. I have a back-up computer if this one gets lunched. I don't see any problems with the legal BS, as I am the registered user. It is not a bootlegged disk or program I am using.I just used the express installation. After it looked my computer over, it didn't install anything. I guess all the updates, patches, and fixes were current to begin with.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 08-26-2002 02:14 AM
The jury is in. Windows 2000 Professional is the way to go on a PC. It just beats the hell out of 95, 98, ME, and XP.It is nice to be able to come into my computer room after several days, jiggle the mouse, and not having to see some half-butted error message and/or a total loss of keyboard functions. It is ready and waiting to go! W2K Prof in this machine has not crashed yet. I am very impressed! All my programs work, and all the drivers work. I can multi-task up the butt, and W2K Prof just seems to ask for more to do. Jeeze, at one time I had 5 things running on each monitor, and it still ran smooth as silk. 
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 08-26-2002 06:38 AM
Hmm.. sad as this may seem, I think I'm going to look at the licence BS very carefully before installing SP3. Having looked through the technical specs, there are some glitches in the hardware abstraction layer which have affected me (mainly hangs caused by IRQ issues to do with my video capture card) which it seems like SP3 will fix. But if this means having to give Microsoft the legal right to take personal details from my machine and sell them to junk mail companies, Nigerian con merchants and goodness knows how many other people, that's not a price I'm willing to pay.As for the security issue, I can well believe that if the security services really want to access your hard disc remotely while you're online, then they have the means to do it. They can also listen in to your 'phone conversations and track your whereabouts using the signal from your mobile 'phone, too. I guess you have to accept that the right to privacy can be restricted to a certain extent in the name of public safety. But there have to be limits on it, and most of my security paranoia is not to do with the government 'listening in', but over the possibility that private individuals or organisations might be able to do it. At home my only significant Internet use is to download e-mail messages (99% of web use I do from work). I keep the modem physically unplugged from the 'phone line at all times except when connecting. The reason I started doing this is that I once had a modem card zapped by lightning while it was left plugged in, and resented having to spend £50 to replace it. But I think it also makes good security sense to keep it unplugged, too. If a virus (e.g. MTX or some variants of Magistr), worm or Trojan contains code instructing the machine to connect, either to pass data out of download more malicious code in, then this code cannot be executed if the modem is unplugged. I'm convinced that this precaution together with a firewall (Zone Alarm in my case) will keep all but determined professionals out of my PC. I'm online for such short periods of time that if anyone really did want to get a significant volume of data out of it, they would have to physically break into my flat and do it that way. Even then, they'd still have to defeat the W2K username security and file encryption, which I imagine the authorities could do, but most other people would have serious trouble. If, however, installing SP3 enables W2K to ignore a firewall and still pass information out while connected, I don't want to do it. I have nothing to hide on my hard disc and I don't mind legal authorities having access to it under certain circumstances (i.e. if they obtain a court order), but I don't see why I should allow a private company to obtain personal data about me as part of a contract for the sale of goods.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|