 |
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: The Return of the King trailer
|
|
|
Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 09-28-2003 03:25 PM
quote: They made this decision long before first weekend numbers were in. Several threads in other sections of the forum note that.
It's definately a ploy to drive more people in, but it wasnt based on dissapointing sales. They knew long before.
I find it hard to believe that New Line would need to wait for opening week figures to know that the film wasn't going to live up to their wants. If this were the case, you'd never see studios advertising the heck out of crappy movies, prior to them opening, that they know aren't going to do well.
There's something wrong when trailers for another movie are used to get patrons into the theatre.
As it stands now, theatres customarily bend over backwards to do any trailer programming a studio wants when they first receive the print. Now they're asking for more and giving nothing in return. Sure, I'd like to think I'm a nice guy, but even nice guys have to charge their customers (or even suppliers) for the work they do for them. If New Line wants to reimburse my theatres for the extra work we are doing for them, then we'd happily do it for them.
Heck, if New Line would chip in for some newspaper adds in all of our markets we might even consider doing it.
A lot of you have said that it's not really any extra work and that you'd be adding extra trailers every week anyway. Well, in many, many theatres that is simply not the case. I know of hundreds of sceens that do not add trailers to a feature after it opens and only remove trailers from the print as the features advertised in the trailers open or leave the area.
Maybe I'm just crazy, but I don't understand why individual theatres should foot the cost (beyond what we've regularily agreed to in the past -- no matter how minimal) of another company's (New Line's) marketing stategy.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|