|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: How do you like your Music served?
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-06-2004 09:47 PM
I like CDs, and have a lot of them. All of my MP3s are done from my CDs at 256 Kbps. Since my MP3s are made primarily for playing on computer speakers at home or work, they're fine for that purpose. They're also made as insurance, so if something happens to my CD collection, I have the MP3s of a lot of the hits in the collection as a backup.
I used 256 Kbps rate on the MP3s since I reextracted some of the files and burned them to an audio CD and compared them with the original CDs, and I can't tell the difference, even on my high-end system, or at least on the kind of music I listen to, I couldn't tell the difference.
The only way I buy music is on CD, since that's most convenient for playing on my home stereo system, my primary listening place.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-06-2004 10:14 PM
I agree with the "live" answer. For recorded music, I can play the following formats at home:
- vinyl - CD - cassette (yuck) - reel to reel (1/4" half-track and quarter track, 7.5 or 15ips) - cart (mono only) - mp3, wav, au,ogg, etc. - 16mm optical track - radio (AM and FM)
I'll listen to it if it sounds good. That usually excludes anything that uses lossy compression, though higher bit-rate mp3s are borderline ok for background music and such. Minidisc isn't bad, but I don't quite see the point in this age of affordable CD burners. It made sense at one time as a cart-machine replacment for radio and live theatre (stage) use, but that role is pretty limited now that computer-based systems are taking on that function.
I believe that some radio stations are actually using mp2-compressed files (yes, mp2, not mp3), as some older computer-based automation systems depend on those (and I'm sure that Josh or someone else will correct me if that's wrong).
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erick Akers
Arse Kicker

Posts: 201
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 03-07-2004 03:47 AM
Am I the only one here with a DTS system in my Car?
I have been an avid collector of Quadraphonic material, and for the last couple of years, I have been rolling my own DTS versions of my favorites.
After all, where else are you going to find an origional Quadraphonic version of Pop Corn by HOTT BUTTERED!!!
So Far, DTS and SONY have only scratched the surface of the extensive library of quad material out there, so I had no other choice but to roll my own!!!
You should see the reactions I get when I put a DTS CD in for unsuspecting passengers.
They really made some fun quad mixes back in the early days.
Personal favorites:
Black Sabbath, Pink Floyd, The Eagles, Kraftwerk, Guess Who, Led Zeppelin, Jethro Tull, Edger Winter Group, The Doors, Creedence Clearwater Revival and too many more to list.
She's come Un Done by The Guess Who is the one song that always gives the ladies goose pimples.
The mix is so erie it even gives me chills!!!
War Pigs and Money are always a hit with the Guys.
DTS & QUADROPHONIC SOUND TRULY KICKS MAJOR ARSE!!!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 03-07-2004 11:31 AM
Nobody's mentioned Edison cylinders, so I guess I'll have to go with that!!
Daryl's display on peak limiting explains a lot of what FM has become. In the '60s, the FCC went on record as intending that FM should be as sonically transparent to the source material as possible. Of course, everything recorded back then was limited to the dynamic range of vinyl or analog tape, so that wasn't saying much, but it was expected to be less compressed than an AM station. The audio processors back then were mostly single band jobs that weren't anywhere near as sophisticated as the processing stuff that's on the market today. The REAL purists were generally the public stations. I saw quite a few college outlets that had NO audio processing at all. One had a Dolby system and broadcast alignment tones to the public once a week.
As FM became more common in cars however, I think the need to overcome ambient sound levels, and the competitive pressures to be the loudest on the dial largely drove the move to reduce dynamic range on FM to the maximum extent technically possible. Even with the budgets available in a market as large as Seattle, some of those stations are pretty hard to listen to for very long.
Now, with the new digital stuff, I imagine the audio display of anything but an NPR station is pretty much a flat bar of digitally chopped and recreated peaks.
The point that David brings up (FM stations sounding like an MP3 player) isn't too far off. The syndicated stations are broadcasting off of audio streams that are compressed to some extent and digitally multiplexed to allow lots of channels on the carrier (kind of like comparing Dish Network to C-band satellites). Compounding this, the internet is allowing for a convenient way to transport commercial content to stations, and some of this is pretty low-level MP3 stuff that's realy noticeable on FM. Finally, the studio-to-tranmsmitter radio links that some stations use are not all "uncompressed", and introduce their own artifacts to the audio stream.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|