|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Jay Leno Puts in His Notice. Conan O'Brien to Replace.
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 09-28-2004 10:23 AM
I never liked Letterman. If he spent less time laughing at his own jokes, maybe he would give other people a chance to laugh. Oh wait, that would mean his jokes have to be funny.
"This show is so great, tonight it's being televised!"
Holy shit! That one puts me on the floor every week I hear it!! Way to go, Letterman, what would we do without your wit??
Leno is only funny when people make fun of him. He has that little weasel laugh of his that's a hoot. When other people try to mimmic it, it's downright hillarious. The "Headlines" and Jay-Walking segments are funny, and the monologue has a few gems, but when he gets to the guest interviews, it's less funny than Larry King.
Conan, on the other hand, is my favorite of the three. Conan seems to strike a chord with my generation for some reason. The content of his show is OK, but it's his delivery which really makes it funny. I liked how he made fun of Leno's Headline segment by making fake headlines and insisting that "You just can't make this stuff up!!"
2009 is too far away anyway. By then there might not be any TV.
=TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 09-29-2004 04:07 PM
I don't care for Leno's style, but the man himself is a prince to work with. Very easygoing and professional backstage, as opposed to some of the other "talents" I used to deal with at Caesars Palace, MGM (before it became Bally's), and the Las Vegas Hilton.
Wonder when Conan will get around to renaming the "In the Year 2000" bit?
Letterman's OK by me, though I too think he's not quite what he was. We should all look and sound so good after bypass surgery.
Already miss Kilborn.
Jimmy Kimmel? He needs to surround himself with some producers that know the basics of showmanship. I take it the show is supposed to be young and "edgy" but it comes off as incredibly inept in execution. It's evolving as its producers reinvent the wheel, discovering for themselves what more experienced people already know, as far as what works and what doesn't on stage or in front of a camera. But the learning seems to be going very slowly. ABC must be hard up to fill that slot--can't believe the patience they're showing while the show goes through its agonizing adjustments. In its present state the show, though improved, is a waste of bandwidth.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|