Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Don Imus' Radio-Thon (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Don Imus' Radio-Thon
Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 04-12-2007 11:30 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Never for one day in my life have I liked Don Imus. I always wondered how he got a gig in the New York market, mumbling as he does. All you hear is, "Mummm mugph maafmpj mummumhhmum."

Regardless, he was canned because spots were being pulled. If CBS had just left it alone (the controversy), it would've went away on its own. But the big clients hollered and CBS blinked.

Doubtless, Imus' phone is probably ringing off the hook as we speak, with offers. He'll pop back up on the air again soon, somewhere.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Dubrois
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 896
From: Cleveland, OH
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-13-2007 12:00 AM      Profile for Frank Dubrois     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tim Reed
He'll pop back up on the air again soon, somewhere.
.......and that's really to bad. They could put Muppet Show reruns on or something. Hell, just leave static on the air, I'd watch that instead of him..

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-13-2007 03:48 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seriously, I am amazed that people still listen to the radio. Sometimes the radio is on where I work and I am amazed at the content, which seems to be nearly 60% advertising. It's awful. And the quality and programming are complete ass. It's totally unacceptable. If I want entertainment while I drive, I'll listen to music I bring myself. Lacking that, I'll listen to my own thoughts. Any of this is preferable to listening to some guy on the radio talk. Howard Stern is not entertaining, nor is this Imus character. Just look at his face. Go on, look at it! He belongs in the 70's, clearly. Here with us in the future is not his place, nor is it the place for ancient, primitive technology like radio. Since this is the future, everything needs to be digital. Digital radio, you suggest? I don't think so. We need new digital ideas, not just digital versions of some schmuck or schmucks talking, doing lame things for the sake of entertainment. Don't ask me to suggest new digital ideas for entertainment. Oh no. Instead I will be the one to judge what is entertaining. And radio is not entertaining. It needs to die. Forever. And be forgotten about as quickly as possible. Now what was I complaining about?

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 04-13-2007 04:57 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Matt Fields
This is where we diasagree. Does anyone really think that saying spiteful, harmful things should be banned as a matter of law?

Define 'spiteful' and 'harmful'.

Should I be able to say that you are ugly? Probably; you might not like it, you may feel that you are not, but I wouldn't be doing you any real harm by saying it.

Should I be able to say (without any evidence to support it) that you are a child rapist? Probably not. Firstly, I would be making what I claimed was a statement of fact, which was incorrect, and assuming that I knew it to be incorrect, a lie. By saying that you were ugly, I would just be expressing an opinion. Secondly, there would be a real possibility of you suffering real harm, you could be attacked, even killed, by an angry mob. Suppose I was to go even further, and encourage the angry mob to attack you; should I be able to do that?

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Waaland
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-13-2007 06:20 AM      Profile for Joshua Waaland   Email Joshua Waaland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Joe to a certain extent. I love music and so when I get tired of listening to my limited number of cd's that I can take in my car (they don't have a fm broadcaster for MP3 players yet that isn't totally full of static), then I like to listen to the radio. Only problem is there is no music there either. Just a bunch of morons talking about how they got wasted over the weekend and yadda, yadda, yadda.

Now we even have afternoon shows with nothing but talking on the radio. Reminds me of MTV. Doesn't MTV stand for MUSIC TELEVISION? The key word here being MUSIC. [Eek!] Then they started putting all of those reality shows on and you had to wait for hours just to see a video.

I have rented a couple of cars in the past with satellite radio and I was not impressed with that either. Still have to listen to ads and DJ's so what is the advantage? No way I would pay a monthly fee for that. [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 04-13-2007 07:48 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yahoo!/AP News Story

quote:
Imus' wife steps in after CBS fires host

By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer

NEW YORK - Don Imus' wife took over his radio fundraiser Friday after CBS fired the host for racist remarks about the Rutgers women's basketball team. She described Imus' brief meeting with the team the night before and praised the women as "beautiful and courageous."

"They gave us the opportunity to listen to what they had to say and why they're hurting and how awful this is," author Deirdre Imus said as she co-hosted the fundraiser for children's charities.

"He feels awful," she said. "He asked them, 'I want to know the pain I caused, and I want to know how to fix this and change this.'"

"I have to say that these women are unbelievably courageous and beautiful women," she said.

The two-day radio fundraiser had been scheduled long before Don Imus' on-air description of team members as "nappy-headed hos" set off a national debate about taste and tolerance.

On Wednesday, a week after the remark and after advertisers began pulling their support, MSNBC said it would no longer televise the show. CBS fired Imus Thursday from the radio show that he has hosted for nearly 30 years.

"He has flourished in a culture that permits a certain level of objectionable expression that hurts and demeans a wide range of people," CBS Corp. chief executive Leslie Moonves said in a memo to his staff.

"In taking him off the air, I believe we take an important and necessary step not just in solving a unique problem, but in changing that culture, which extends far beyond the walls of our company," Moonves said.

C. Vivian Stringer, the Rutgers team's coach, spoke briefly Thursday night after meeting with Imus and his wife at the governor's mansion.

"We had a very productive meeting," she said. "Hopefully, we can put all of this behind us."

She did not say if the team forgave Imus for his remark.

Critics said the host's remarks about the women were just the latest in a line of objectionable statements by the ringmaster of a show that mixed high-minded talk about politics and culture with crude, locker-room humor.

The cantankerous Imus, once named one of the 25 Most Influential People in America by Time magazine and a member of the National Broadcasters Hall of Fame, was one of radio's original shock jocks. His career took flight in the 1970s and with a cocaine- and vodka-fueled outrageous humor. After sobering up, he settled into a mix of highbrow talk about politics and culture, with locker room humor sprinkled in.

Imus apologized on his show late last week after getting complaints about the Rutgers comment. He also tried to explain himself before the Rev. Al Sharpton's radio audience, appearing alternately contrite and combative. But many of his advertisers bailed in disgust, particularly after the Rutgers women spoke of their hurt.

On Friday, Sharpton praised Moonves' decision to can Imus and said it was time to change the culture of publicly degrading other people.

"I think we've got to really used this to really stop this across the board," Sharpton told CBS's "The Early Show."

Some Imus fans considered the radio host's punishment too harsh.

WFAN DJ Mike Francesa, whose sports show with partner Chris Russo is considered a likely successor to Imus in the morning, said he was embarrassed by the company. "I'm embarrassed by their decision. It shows, really, the worst lack of taste I've ever seen," he said.

Losing Imus will be a financial hit to CBS Radio, which also suffered when Howard Stern left for satellite radio. The program earns about $15 million in annual revenue for CBS, which owns Imus' home radio station WFAN-AM and manages Westwood One, the company that syndicates the show nationally WFAN.

The show's charity fundraiser had raised more than $1.3 million Thursday before Imus learned he had lost his job. The annual event has raised more than $40 million since 1990.

"This may be our last radiothon, so we need to raise about $100 million," Imus cracked at the start of the event.

Volunteers were getting about 200 more pledges per hour Thursday than they did last year, with most callers expressing support for Imus, said phone bank supervisor Tony Gonzalez. The event benefited Tomorrows Children's Fund, the CJ Foundation for SIDS and the Imus Ranch.

Imus' troubles have also affected his wife, whose book "Green This!" came out this week. Her promotional tour has been called off "because of the enormous pressure that Deirdre and her family are under," said Simon & Schuster publicist Victoria Meyer.
___

Associated Press writers Rebecca Santana, Karen Matthews, Warren Levinson, Seth Sutel, Tara Burghart, Colleen Long and Hillel Italie contributed to this report.


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-13-2007 10:31 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anybody heard the new Larry the Cable Guy album? He offends Mexicans, women, the mentally-disabled, and so on. He's more offensive than Imus, and far more popular too...where is the PC army?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-13-2007 11:08 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't recall Larry the Cable Guy teeing off on black people. Much of his act is about making fun of white trash while embracing that part of our culture at the same time.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Waaland
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-13-2007 11:15 AM      Profile for Joshua Waaland   Email Joshua Waaland   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What about the Mind of Mencia Show? He makes fun of everybody.

quote:
"He feels awful," she said. "He asked them, 'I want to know the pain I caused, and I want to know how to fix this and change this.'"
I have watched Imus a few times on MSNBC. I always turned the channel not because of offensive behavior but because he was just plain boring. [sleep] I think Imus has come out looking like the bigger man in this. He has apologized and paid the price for his "mistake". What have the other people done? Have they forgiven him? Absolutely not. They just continue to grill him over it. They have to keep the press focused on themselves. [Roll Eyes]

Sometimes I just want to bitch slap these people on tv. [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 04-13-2007 01:41 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You would have thought Imus would be a good program to drift off to sleep to, as I used to leave my TV on MSNBC to sleep to. I had to stop doing this (and find another channel to drift off to) as Imus woke me up with his infantile screaming rants at either his engineer, his producer or someone in the studio regarding the temperature of the studio, someone bringing him the wrong coffee to drink, or something nonsensical.
I'm not going to miss him. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-13-2007 02:23 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's my theory. [sleep]

A majority of people in the media and general public have quietly known for some time now that the likes of Don Imus go too far at times. But there's the freedom of speech argument, and that carries a lot of weight to Americans (it's a bogus argument in this case in my opinion). And, more importantly, there's money to be made in shock-jock controversy. So at some point the shock jock train left the station and became this intertia-driven entity that we all tolerated, even though in the back of our minds we knew it was not "good".

So there's a pent-up feeling that "Things have gone too far but we don't know how to stop this train and besides we're making lots of money and people are tuning in and it's funny in a guilty-pleasure sort of way, so waddaya gonna do?"

Then suddenly Don Imus provided the perfect opportunity for everyone to focus their collective feelings and cleanse their conscience by railing against that which they've silently condoned for so long. "Fire the racist bastard!"

Really, Don Imus just facilitated the perfect storm.

Now let's see if Carlos Mencia etc. suffer the same fate. They probably deserve to. But I'm guessing they won't.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 04-13-2007 02:24 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Don Imus' on-air description of team members as "nappy-headed hos"
Just what the hell is a "nappy head," anyway? [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-13-2007 02:56 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why is any of this even an issue? If you don't like the programming on a particular radio station, listen to a different one or turn the radio off. Simple. Easy.

I like radio as a concept and enjoy listening to it, but I agree with the other comments that most commercial stations leave much to be desired. NPR and some college stations are worth listening to, at least.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Dugan
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Goodyear, AZ
Registered: Jul 2006


 - posted 04-13-2007 03:00 PM      Profile for Chris Dugan   Author's Homepage   Email Chris Dugan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's an issue because according to the PC crowd, things need to be regulated more. Everything has to be censored because they don't want to take the responsibility to teach the rights and wrongs of the world.

It's just too damn hard to turn the channel.

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 04-13-2007 03:19 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Oh it sure as hell does.
No, I'm sorry but it does not. The first amendment, and the freedom of speech clause within, like the rest of the constitution, protect citizens from the government. The constitution does not protect us from each other. There has not even been a hint of government action regarding Imus's comments. He did nothing illegal. Therefore, this does not have anything to do with freedom of speech.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.