Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » New rock band "CHICKENFOOOT" (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: New rock band "CHICKENFOOOT"
Dennis Benjamin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1445
From: Denton, MD
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-23-2009 01:08 PM      Profile for Dennis Benjamin   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Benjamin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS LIST:

Steve Vai is not listed.

I know now why I do not read this piece of trash magazine.

They snubbed both Steve Vai and his teacher Joe Satriani.

They should have been SOMEWHERE on the list.

Whatever...... [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-23-2009 01:29 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess the mention of Kirk Hammett of Metallica is supposed to make up for that. Kirk Hammett took lessons from Joe Satriani in the early 1980s. Steve Vai studied with Satriani, but I think picked up some of his creativity during his years playing in Frank Zappa's band.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-23-2009 02:03 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The list also leaves out Fleetwood Mac's Lindsey Buckingham. He can play rings around just about anybody and his style is unmistakable.

You have to keep in mind that these lists are usually voted on by musicians + RS editors, or else they are created with online polls and other such methods.

Then you have to add in "personal opinion of the editors" criteria -- for example if I had any power at Rolling Stone, I would never put Hendrix at the top of the list because I can barely stand listening to him. Then keep in mind that RS is read by people under 30, most of whom have never heard of Chet Atkins let alone enjoy that type of pickin', etc.

In other words there's no way in the world they can make a definitive list unless they just make an alphabetical list of every guitar player who ever lived.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-23-2009 03:26 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the end Rolling Stone is really no authority at all in terms of rating guitar players. I think long established magazines like Guitar World would do a better job, even with the real risk any "best guitarists" list would be heavily dominated by hard rock/metal players.

Speaking of metal, there's another guitar player Rolling Stone should be absolutely ashamed of themselves for overlooking in their so-called best guitarists list: Darrell Lance Abbott, also known as "Dimebag Darrell," of 1990s metal band Pantera. That Dallas-based band played numerous times here in Lawton in their up and coming days.

In 2004, Dimebag Darrell was shot to death while playing a concert with his then new band, Damageplan. Some dip shit angry about the breakup of Pantera decided to take it out on the guitar hero. The gunman was killed by a police officer who later arrived on the scene. Guitarists Zack Wilde and Edward Van Halen were among the many who attended Dimebag's funeral. Reportedly Edward Van Halen had one of his prized guitars (the one on the cover of Van Halen II) buried with Dimebag Darrell because the Pantera guitarist was a big Van Halen fan and had always wanted a Charvel "Frankenstrat" just like it.

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-24-2009 03:05 AM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the problem is the article being titled as it is, it implies the 100 most talented or able guitar players. I don't know the best way to reword it, but if you take composition and originality into account, I think the list appears a lot better. Especially composition. There is something to be said for a Hammett solo that makes you want to turn it up and play air guitar versus someone who may be technically superior, but just doesn't know how to compose something that sounds good. Take Cobain's intro to Smells Like Teen Spirit. It doesn't sound that difficult to play, yet it is one of the most famous intros of all time, defining an entire genre. Everyone will find a few they disagree with, but in reality if you squabble over 5 or 10 percent that's not so many. They could do a list of 100 most talented guitar players, then 100 most creative/unique, then 100 most influential, and so on, but that's a lot of lists and it would grow boring.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-24-2009 11:52 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cobain's intro to Smell's Like Teen Spirit stands out only because of the intense popularity of the song. It has nothing to do with his playing skills, phrasing, etc. Come As You Are is another one off the Nevermind album that has an iconoclastic opening riff.

Such "best" lists on guitar playing, movies or anything creative can only ever be subjective. Using a guitar to play music is a creative art (or craft). It is not a sport where someone can keep score.

Still, proficiency with the instrument is a big deal. There's a lot of guys on the RR top 100 list that I would likely include in a list of "favorite guitar players." There's others, like Jack White or Joan Jett, that I would not include. They still make some cool music, but their guitar playing simply is not impressive.

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-24-2009 05:13 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My point was simply that the list is titled "greatest" not "best." Greatness carries a whole lot more along with it than just ability to execute a certain skill set, in my opinion.

On the supergroup thing again real quickly, though, I hope we can all agree the #1 supergroup of all was the Traveling Wilburys. How cool would it have been to be a fly on the wall around those guys.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 06-24-2009 05:34 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chad Souder
My point was simply that the list is titled "greatest" not "best."
Can you say "semantics"?

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-25-2009 09:39 AM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes. That's the whole point of language. Different words mean different things. Otherwise there wouldn't be different words.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 06-25-2009 10:37 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Except your definition of "great" and "greatest" versus "good" and "best" is entirely arbitrary. There's no reason that being the best guitarist means only that they are the most technically proficient and there's no reason that being great has to focus almost entirely on song-writing/influence.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.