Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Jennifer's Body & Megan Fox (Page 6)

 
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
Author Topic: Jennifer's Body & Megan Fox
Jonathan Althaus
Master Film Handler

Posts: 435
From: Bedford, TX
Registered: Dec 2008


 - posted 09-09-2009 08:06 PM      Profile for Jonathan Althaus   Email Jonathan Althaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well you can bet on one thing, you'll get head and/or tail.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 09-10-2009 09:15 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Truth... but what you don't know is whether it will be all head or all tail - or a mixture of both.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 09-11-2009 01:21 AM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it's time I develop a reel foot fetish.

When my print arrives I might bust out the wet splicer [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 09-11-2009 01:34 AM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jarret Chessell
I think it's time I develop a reel foot fetish.

Oh My! That sounds soooo hhot! [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-11-2009 11:03 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
(Changing the thread title does make it a bit tough to find the thread...)

I'm a bit surprised to see the New York Times (Michael Cieply) describe its TIFF34 screening thus:
quote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/11/movies/11women.html

The audience was laughing in all the right places, a good sign for the film, which is walking a fine line between comedy, horror and a postpunk feminism that is telegraphed by the title’s cute pink script in the opening credits.

But somehow I had previously failed to notice it was Diablo Cody. Which explains a lot.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 09-11-2009 02:12 PM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John, I too was really down on this movie until I read the Times review . I also didn't know it was Diablo Cody, or that Amanda Seyfried was in it. I have a very dim opinion of Megan Fox and modern horror films, but I am tempted now and may actually see it. Even with Diablo Cody, I fear any meaningful subtext will be overshadowed by outrageous sexualization and overt violence, two of producers' and studio execs' favorite things, it would seem.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 09-11-2009 11:56 PM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry John, the name of the thread was changed to protect the identity of the innocent.
Anyways, I'm glad to see that the movie is shaping up to look like a decent enjoyable film (Megan Fox might be the gravy).

I guess we'll find out next week if it's as good as I want it to be....

Thanks to this thread we also know that among other things, Phil has a foot fetish.

 |  IP: Logged

Marin Zorica
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 09-12-2009 04:41 PM      Profile for Marin Zorica   Email Marin Zorica   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jarret Chessell
Sorry John, the name of the thread was changed to protect the identity of the innocent.
You're innocent and waiting Megan to fix that? [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-14-2009 06:40 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The knives are out...

Web Page

The real Megan Fox? Dumb-as-a-rock, ungracious and classless, say Transformers crew
ARJUN RAMACHANDRAN
September 15, 2009 - 7:46AM

Transformers star Megan Fox has been slammed as "dumb-as-a-rock", "ungracious" and "classless" by fellow crew members from the blockbuster film, who also said the actress would be better off pursuing a porn career.

The three crew members tore into Fox in defence of Transformers director Michael Bay, after Fox likened him to Napolean Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler during a recent interview.

In an open letter that was posted on Bay's website, the three unnamed crew members - who said they had worked with Bay for 10 years - said it was Fox who was unprofessional and a "grump of the set".

"Yes, Megan has great eyes, a tight stomach we spray with glycerin, and an awful silly Marilyn Monroe tattoo plastered on her arm that we cover up to keep the moms happy," the letter said.

"When facing the press, Megan is the queen of talking trailer trash and posing like a porn star.

"And yes we've had the unbearable time of watching her try to act on set, and yes, it's very cringe-able.

"So maybe, being a porn star in the future might be a good career option."

They said Bay had picked Fox - a "shy, inexperienced girl" - from obscurity and turned her into a star.

"And who is the real Megan Fox?

"She's as about ungracious a person as you can ever fathom.

"Maybe she will learn, but we figure if she can sling insults, then she can take them too.

"Megan really is a thankless, classless, graceless, and shall we say unfriendly bitch."

In her interview with a British magazine, Fox had said of Bay: “He's like Napoleon and he wants to create this insane, infamous mad-man reputation.

“He wants to be like Hitler on his sets, and he is.

“He has no social skills at all."

Bay wrote on his website that Fox's comments were part of her charm, and that he did not condone the crew members' response.

"I don't condone the crew letter to Megan. And I don't condone Megan's outlandish quotes.

"But her crazy quips are part of her crazy charm.

"The fact of the matter is I still love working with her, and I know we still get along. I even expect more crazy quotes from her on Transformers 3."

But the crew members signed off their letter imploring Bay to "squish her character in the first ten minutes of Transformers 3".

"We can tell you that will make the crew happy!"

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 09-15-2009 05:28 AM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Wilson
The real Megan Fox? Dumb-as-a-rock, ungracious and classless, say Transformers crew
just the kind of woman Phil Hill would be interested in [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 09-15-2009 11:10 AM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess the bottom line is that we really just want to watch her on the screen.... It might be a blessing we don't get to know what she's really like, but that's part of what acting is.
Two more days until we can crack open those film cans and see what this is really going to be like with our own eyes.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 09-17-2009 09:05 AM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Today is the day we get to open the fox boxes and handle Jennifer's Body!

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 09-17-2009 05:57 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our theatre didn't book it for whatever reason - so I'm going to either have to scrounge up an employee pass & see it at a sister theatre, shell out the cash to watch it at a competitor's theatre, or just not see it theatrically.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarret Chessell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 288
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 09-18-2009 01:57 AM      Profile for Jarret Chessell   Email Jarret Chessell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, worse case scenario, you can wait for the blu-ray and ask to go over and watch it at Andy Bajew's "screening" room he's building. I think Brad has him talked into that $135,000 blu-ray player.

I was trying to put together "jennifer's body" without actually looking at any of the frames so that I wouldn't ruin it for myself.... I might be spending some time fixing framing issues later, but that's the price you pay.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 09-18-2009 07:28 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
So how did your one-handed splices turn out? [Devil]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 8 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.