Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Windows 7 (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: Windows 7
Paul J. Neuhaus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 126
From: Iraq.. Again!
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 11-11-2009 02:02 PM      Profile for Paul J. Neuhaus   Email Paul J. Neuhaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You know, I've often wondered about this subject: Programming for computers of the future. Do you make something that will run on the computers of today or tomorrow. How much growth in speed and resources can be assumed? Sounds like a hard job to me. And this doesn't just have to do with operating systems but games too. Of course thats why they get paid the big bucks.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-11-2009 03:33 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Chris, I heard it through the grapevine so I don't have a link for you.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-11-2009 09:48 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've heard that too, Joe. From Microsoft sources in trade magazines. That's standard stuff. They're always developing two versions beyond what they have. One is in active development, one is on the drawing board / proof-of-concept stage. At least that WAS the case, and I have no reason to believe it's not the case now. It makes perfect sense to me that that's the case.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 12-06-2009 05:27 PM      Profile for Mike Heenan   Email Mike Heenan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I bought a Netbook on Black Friday with Windows 7 Starter edition installed, and it's great so far, runs fine on 1gb memory. However... as others have mentioned, I'm shocked at the amount of bloatware. It has a 250 gb hard drive, of which 207 of 220gb remains available. I know that when you do the math, the advertised GB doesn't exactly match the real world GB amount. Does anyone know how many GB the Windows 7 Starter edition should take up without the bloatware? The netbook didn't come with a disc, so I guess I have to output a disc image and burn it on another computer.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-06-2009 06:15 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know answer to your question, but that really isn't bad, especially after you take into consideration the manufacturer's definition of gigabyte versus the real word gigabyte.

 |  IP: Logged

Andy Bajew
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 136
From: Bellaire, Texas
Registered: Jun 2009


 - posted 12-06-2009 06:21 PM      Profile for Andy Bajew   Email Andy Bajew   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The minimum amount of HDD space Windows 7 requires is 15GB. Windows 7 Starter will actually require a little bit more for the Netbooks depending on the brand you bought. Netbooks are designed to have a dual start up where you boot to a general screen where you can use the most basic of programs and then boot straight into Windows when you choose for a quicker load time(sort of a Asus mimic). Obviously if you have a brand where it doesn't do that style start up then you require less HDD space

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 12-07-2009 06:43 AM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When I started this thread my friend was dealing with a sucky Vista laptop. He has since upgraded to W7 and all of his problems seem to have disappeared. He is now out there telling everyone with similar Vista issues to bite the bullet and upgrade. As far as we can tell, the networking question I originally posed is not an issue.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-07-2009 02:19 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My Windows 7 Ultimate installation uses about 20 GB, but I have a couple of small programs installed like Firefox as well as all of the Windows 7 updates that evidently happen every week.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 12-07-2009 06:14 PM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Windows 7 was my idea.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul J. Neuhaus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 126
From: Iraq.. Again!
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 12-08-2009 10:06 PM      Profile for Paul J. Neuhaus   Email Paul J. Neuhaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I want to retract my earlier statement about libraries. I have started using them and they are really quite cool.
You can include folders on multiple devices to be included on them. For instance my external hard drive has videos on it. I have included that folder in my videos library and now when it is plugged in they show up in one place with all my other videos. This is just one example of how to use them but the neat thing is when that device or network location is not available.. ie unplugged the media does not show up. So you don't have to worry about clicking on something that wont do anything.
You can also set a default save area so that if you drag something to a library it saves to a default folder.

I didn't think it was a good feature until I really tried it and it is now quite fricken convenient!!

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-09-2009 11:44 AM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been employed by (large japanese storage company) for 9 years and been in charge of supporting 3000 laptops for our users. We skipped over Vista entirely and are going to start a pilot testing program this coming spring for Windows 7. (There are over 40 different applications used throughout the company some of which are custom and built years and years ago so testing a new OS and certifying that all the apps will run takes a LONG time.) Yesterday was my first full day having migrated myself over to Windows 7 on a 3 year old Dell D620 with a 2.3ghz core 2 duo processor, nvidia NVS110 graphics chip and 3gb of ram. I have to say I am surprised and pleased with the performance and have yet to come across any application that wouldn't run. Drivers were no problem. I only had to visit dell's support site and pull down a vista graphics driver which installed easily. I like some of the new features such as the external device file organization as stated above and also how data files in the user profile are organized. Then I put the theme into 'windows classic' and it is even more responsive! It feels like a fast XP with UI tweaks now. I can't comment on how an in place upgrade would go as I did a clean installation.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-09-2009 04:28 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only thing I don't like about the Classic mode is the GIANT grey bar on the bottom of the screen which is thicker than it was in any previous Windows incarnation... and uglier. I refuse to use auto hide" type schemes because that is just annoying.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-10-2009 08:44 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
-next Homegroup: This is WIN 7's answer to workgroups. It only works with win 7 pc's. i.e. all members must have win 7

Wait -- you are saying that if have a bunch of my Users on worktstations with XP and we get a few new computers with Win 7, the XP machines with WORKGROUP won't communicate with the Win7s with HOMEGROUP? So I will have to get all of them on Win7 at the same time? Really?

 |  IP: Logged

Paul J. Neuhaus
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 126
From: Iraq.. Again!
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 12-10-2009 10:14 PM      Profile for Paul J. Neuhaus   Email Paul J. Neuhaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Worry not Frank. Workgroups are still available. You will still be able to share your files from XP to 7 and vice versa.

Homegroup is a new feature in addition to workgroup which only Windows 7 PC's or XBox can share media. I can't fully comprehend it's purpose though. I only have 1 laptop running 7 so I tried the Homegroup thing out with a friend who was also running 7 on his laptop. The result: it looked like a Workgroup to me! Don't get it. I do know one thing that is helpful is the ability to join a homegroup without rebooting!! Never understood that!!
Maybe somebody here that has used Homegroup extensively can answer this:
WHAT'S THE POINT?

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-10-2009 10:56 PM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
The only thing I don't like about the Classic mode is the GIANT grey bar on the bottom of the screen which is thicker than it was in any previous Windows incarnation...
Joe try right clicking the taskbar and choosing properties. Tick the 'use small icons' box. I think that might be what you're after. Also did you figure out how to restore the quick launch area?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.