|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: I finally got an iPad
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-11-2012 07:48 AM
quote: Daily Mail
Apple 'planning to sell £150 iPad Mini AT A LOSS in order to kill off Android tablets'
- Claims suggest Apple will launch iPad Mini this October for between $200-$250
- Dramatic price-point will help Apple compete with cheaper Android tablets
- Apple's $100billion cash reserves may soften blow of loss-making device
Apple is planning to launch an assault against the burgeoning Android tablet market by releasing an 'iPad Mini' - at a loss-making price of around £150, according to new claims. The bargain-basement priced tablet will even feature the same 'Retina' display featured on its big brother, bringing the same 3.1million pixels to a smaller 7-8" display.
Sources told Apple fansite iMore that the aggressively-priced tablet will launch in October this year, with Apple potentially selling the sub-$250 tablet at a loss in order to leave no room for competition.
With Apple sitting on cash reserves of $100bn, the tech giant should at least be able to stomach such a move financially.
iMore reported: 'Today's claim says that Apple is going to step-up the pressure on Android tablet manufacturers with an iPad mini that will sell for a surprisingly low $200-250.
'That's a bit hard to accept in the light of the other major claim this rumor makes, that the iPad mini will keep the full-sized iPad's 2048x1536 resolution.
'If this is true, Apple might have to take a serious cut to its margins, if not sell the mini at a loss. Considering the kind of cash Apple has on hand, though, it might be willing to take the hit just to help kill-off competition from Android tablets.'
If the iPad sells for $250 in the States, that would translate to £150 in the UK, although whether Apple would respect currency rates is up for debate.
With the screen as a premium feature, it is likely sacrifices will be made in other parts of the tablet, such as reduced storage space of, for instance, 8GB for your apps, videos and music.
This will likely cause issues for users as that amount of space will be used up quickly, marking this out as very much a budget tablet.
However, it will also appeal to people who want an iPad for casual browsing and occasional use of apps and movies, but who are not willing to shell out £400 for the bigger brother.
iMore and another website, Daring Fireball, have separately heard that Apple has already built the seven-inch device, and the only decision left is whether to 'go to market'.
Both iMore and Daring Fireball have proven to be reliable sources of internal Apple discussions in the past.
Steve Jobs hated the thought of a smaller iPad, calling them 'dead on arrival'. He said people did not wish to use smaller tablets for video-playback, and feared a smaller tablet would serve as a bridge between the iPad and the iPhone, resulting in app-makers simply 'stretching' their phone apps for the tablet.
In a 2010 earnings call, he said: 'One naturally thinks that a seven-inch screen would offer 70 percent of the benefits of a ten-inch screen.
'Unfortunately, this is far from the truth. … The reason we won't make a seven-inch tablet isn’t because we don’t want to hit a lower price point, it’s because we think the screen is too small to express the software.'
Another big problem - which Android is struggling to deal with - would be the resulting fragmentation, with app-makers having to invest more money for coding different versions of their apps for different devices, something Apple has almost entirely succeeded at avoiding so far.
With the Android tablet market maturing, and competitors like Amazon launching their own tablets such as the Kindle Fire at less than $200, it would make sense for Apple to join the burgeoning cheaper market, although the company may be concerned about devaluing their premium brand, which is associated with high prices but also high quality.
However the company has previous form with cheaper models. The iPod music player was released in 2001, and in 2004 and 2005 the iPod Minis and Nanos were released, bringing elements of Apple's flagship device to a cheaper market.
In March, a source from within competitor Samsung made a 'mini' indescretion while talking to the Korea Times.
While discussing Apple and Samsung's $9.7billion deal for Samsung to manufacturer parts of the iPad, an official said: 'The contract is expected to rise to $11billion by the end of this year as Apple is planning to release a smaller iPad, probably with a 7.85-inch screen, and to sell more of its MacBook Air PCs using Samsung’s faster solid state drive storage.'
Hmm. As an Android tablet owner myself, I would have been tempted by this, but it'll probably come with virtually no memory and no facility to insert a card to expand its capacity.
And incidentally, if $250 is going to be the US price, no way will it be as low as £150 in Britain. Our 20% sales tax (VAT) will see to that alone, even before you factor in higher business operating costs (everything from corporation tax to higher energy bills for stores etc.). I'd say £200 minimum. Against that, reasonable Android tablets are available at around the £100-120 mark (my 10" Archos cost around that), with a 32gb memory card for another £20. Given that the type of people who buy Android tablets tend to be more IT-savvy anyway and therefore processor speed and storage cacapity will be an issue for them, if the predicted sale price of the "Ipad lite" is accurate, I suspect that it's a bit too high to knock Android out of the market.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Heenan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1896
From: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-12-2012 08:35 PM
The one thing I don't like about the iPad is storage space for extra movies. However with a forthcoming jailbreak, this issue will be moot (Of course we can argue that Apple should have made it possible for us to use an SD card for extra storage, but whatever...)
I have the 16GB wifi only model and have not run into space issues yet. The box.net app I signed up for during a promotion gives me 50GB storage (not as great as Dropbox, but for storage only it's killer), and of course Dropbox has 2GB, but that can grow. Also, Microsoft Skydrive gave you 25GB at one time (got that too), so between all these cloud storage apps, I have about 80GB total.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 05-13-2012 07:50 AM
Agreed completely and utterly. And even if the problem isn't as dramatic as terrorists hitting Google's servers, we know that gremlins hit Blackberry's servers last year, and so this kind of thing can and does happen.
I have a completely luddite approach to data backup. Every Sunday night, all the files I want to protect and can't easily be replaced get transferred to one of two portable 1TB hard drives I own. On Monday morning, it goes with me to the office and sits in my desk drawer for the following week, and drive #2 comes home on Friday evening. The following Sunday, drive #2 gets reformatted and overwritten with the new backup, rinse and repeat. I've also put a 1TB drive in my laptop, and so another copy of the data gets written to that from my main home PC just before each time I go travelling. All these copies are Truecrypt-encrypted.
This means that there is always a copy of the data I don't want to lose in a separate physical location from my home PC, and it is encrypted such that only I can read it. Yes, this is a bit of a faff and not as convenient as using clouds, but frankly I trust myself to look after my data more than I'd trust Google, Apple, MS etc.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|