|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: goof-ups in major films that should of been fixed!
|
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 12-04-2013 07:01 PM
quote: Bobby Henderson They might as well put the Empire State Building and Gateway Arch in downtown L.A. for the next Die Hard installment.
In Independence Day, the Empire State Building was sitting in the middle of an avenue, a bit like the GCT/MetLife/Helmsley Building complex...
I do not really mind if movies re-purpose some locations for something else, some artistic license should be permitted, as we should remember that this movie is probably just telling a fictitious story in a fictitious world. This world doesn't need to be a 1-on-1 copy of our own world.
What I do mind though, is some consistency and that's something not even generally respected filmmakers like Christopher Nolan seem to get right. For example, compare the representations of Gotham in the last three Batman movies. There are so many obvious differences and flaws, that I don't even dare to start.
There are other things I do care about, like:
- Obvious plot holes, especially those that could short circuit the whole plot in a minute or so. - Dei ex machina, in the broadest sense. Technically not really a goof, but still quite unforgivable. Also, the main reason why I generally dislike stuff like Harry Potter or stuff revolving around Middle Earth. Those stories are generally full of this shit, there is never any real suspense. Every time when all is lost, you're waiting for some magic wizard, with a perfect sense of timing, to appear, casting just about the right spell in the last minute. - Extreme coincidences that serve as ad-hoc story glue. Since some of those coincidences are just so out-of-this-universe, I would rather consider them a genuine plot hole. - Bad representation of science. Well, I can forgive you if you're making some kind of cartoon, comedy or super-hero movie, but a decent thriller for example, shouldn't need Kryptonite. - Bad representation of technology, especially anything involving computers. I don't know how many versions of MovieOS are out there... And yeah, hacking a computer system is generally a very boring business to look at, but is it really SO hard to make it look at least half way realistic? - Bad effects or CGI in recent productions, especially those big-budget productions. Anno 2013 (or almost 2014), you either make it look like the real thing or just don't do it at all. Almost nobody is really wowed anymore by the latest CGI gizmos anyway.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 12-07-2013 05:55 AM
quote: Marcel Birgelen Bad representation of science. Well, I can forgive you if you're making some kind of cartoon, comedy or super-hero movie, but a decent thriller for example, shouldn't need Kryptonite.
John Christopher said that in order to be plausible, a science fiction novel should contain only one element of fictional science, and then focus on its effect on the real world as is then existed. That idea works well in his stuff (e.g. The Death of Grass - fictional virus kills off all vegetation), and other science fiction novels and movies (e.g. The Boys from Brazil - cloning human beings becomes reality), but I can't see how it would be possible in predict-the-future type stories such as Metropolis or Star Wars. If you're inventing a whole world that doesn't exist, not just one element of it, then you have to invent everything that goes into it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|