Universal Extends Theatrical Window to Five Weekends

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Frank Cox
    Film God
    • Jan 2020
    • 2314
    • Melville Saskatchewan

    #1

    Universal Extends Theatrical Window to Five Weekends

    https://variety.com/2026/film/news/u...ow-1236685714/

    Universal Extends Theatrical Window to Five Weekends in 2026

    Rebecca Rubin
    4–5 minutes

    In a shocking reversal in strategy, Universal Pictures is lengthening the time that its movies will play exclusively in theaters.
    It’s a major change from the pandemic era when Universal was aggressive in brokering deals that shortened the theatrical window to roughly 17 days, or three weekends. Now the studio is committing to longer runs, promising a minimum of five weekends in 2026 and seven weekends in 2027 before a film moves to home entertainment.
    It’s a huge win for movie theater owners, who have long argued that audiences wouldn’t pay to see movies on the big screen if they could wait a few weeks to watch them at home. Way back when, 90-day windows were the norm but the industry average has settled on roughly 45 days since the great COVID box office reset. This kind of commitment is especially meaningful to the nation’s cinema operators as ticket sales lag around 20% behind pre-pandemic years.
    “Our windowing strategy has always been designed to evolve with the marketplace, but we firmly believe in the primacy of theatrical exclusivity and working closely with our exhibition partners to support a healthy, sustainable theatrical ecosystem,” NBCUniversal Entertainment chair Donna Langley told the New York Times, which broke the news of the company’s shift.
    Studios often argue — especially after a costly big-budget flop — that theatrical is just one component of a film’s profitability. That’s because digital rentals and Pay 1 deals can offset potential theatrical losses (or, of course, bolster profits for box-office winners). Universal’s longer guarantee of theatrical exclusivity, however, acknowledges that a meaningful big-screen run secures a better return on investment. Disney, the largest film studio in terms of marketshare, currently boasts a 60-day window.
    “Reminders of Him” will kick off the company’s new policy when the romantic drama, an adaptation of the Colleen Hoover novel, lands in theaters on Friday. Other films on Universal’s 2026 slate include “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey,” the “Despicable Me” sequel “Minions & Monsters” and Steven Spielberg’s “Disclosure Day.”
    However the five (and eventually seven) weekend window won’t apply to Universal’s specialty label Focus Features, which has backed Oscar fare including this year’s “Hamnet,” “Bugonia” and “Song Sung Blue.” Arthouse films, the bread and butter of Focus Features, have particularly struggled to find an audience in the years since COVID; Moving those kinds of movies more quickly to premium video-on-demand platforms can help to save money because it cuts marketing costs.
    The theatrical window has always been a fiercely debated topic across Hollywood. In 2011, Universal controversially attempted to offer director Brett Ratner’s action comedy “Tower Heist” in homes — for a $60 rental fee — just three weeks after it debuted in theaters. Faced with threats of boycotts, Universal was ultimately forced to abandon the plan.
    Over the past six years, though, the conversation reached a fever pitch as movie studios used the pandemic to test all kinds of release models, several of which involved day-and-date debuts on streaming. Adam Aron, CEO of AMC Theatres, has previously called the abridged windows a “failed” experiment, arguing that studios and exhibitors alike would generate more money with longer periods of exclusivity. (Ironically, AMC was the first to strike a landmark deal with Universal in summer 2020, which took the initial sledgehammer to the theatrical window).
    Aron has praised Universal’s new edict, saying it “strengthens the entire theatrical ecosystem.”
    “AMC Theatres values Universal Pictures’ belief in the strength and future of theatrical exhibition,” he said in a statement. “Universal’s continued commitment to theatrical exhibition is extraordinarily beneficial to AMC and strengthens the entire theatrical ecosystem.”​
    I don't really see why this article has such a celebratory tone.

    It's not nothing, but my perception is that they took our wings and left us grounded, so now they're trying to convince us a twig is a bird's nest.

    The window used to be six months and before that it was something like three years. Now five weeks is a "gift"?
  • Steve Guttag
    Film God
    • Jan 2020
    • 3777
    • Annapolis, MD

    #2
    I definitely appreciate your position on this. If there is one cause in the industry I'm behind, it is getting release windows back up to where it makes movies more profitable for everybody.

    What I see in this sort of announcement is an acknowledgment that short release windows have not been the financial benefit that they had first thought and that perhaps, just maybe, someone knows how to read a spreadsheet well enough to see the correlation (and causation) between release windows and movie profitability.

    By announcing the lengthening of the window, so patrons know, I'm predicting that the profitability of all features increase some such that, overall, they see a correlation between longer windows and how much feature films make.

    Without a doubt, you are right. We need to get back to 6-months and longer release windows. I've been touting 6-months on typical features and 12-months on tentpoles (and again, they need to make it clear to the public how long the wait will be before a home release to remove the "nah...I'll just wait a couple of weeks and see it 'for free' at home." The closer the home release is, the bigger the drain is on the theatrical release and the lower the profit of the feature, overall.

    I think it is an important first-step.

    In the meantime, I hope the trend towards independent movies and distribution continues as well. Hollywood has been an unreliable partner when it comes to providing product and terms. The consolidation of studios will only hurt the business as the Disney/Fox merger has already shown.

    If we ever do get back to a 6-12 month release windows, then, maybe (some years from now), we could get sub-run theatres back, which would also lower the overall cost of going to the cinema, which would also help the industry's image. Movies should be considered a "good value" entertainment.

    Comment

    • Mike Blakesley
      Film God
      • Jan 2020
      • 2021
      • Forsyth MT

      #3
      What they fail to take into account too is how fast time passes. Even though the average window (across all movies) these days is around three or four months, people still tend to think it's just a month or six weeks. Ask anyone how soon a movie comes to video and they'll say "oh, a month or so." Well, what's five weekends? It's a month or so.

      Even when it takes longer, time passes so quickly due to everyone's crazy hectic schedule that it seems to go by in a flash.

      When they make it at least three solid months (as in 12 weekends, not five or seven) then I'll start celebrating.

      But at least the media seems to think it's a good thing, so that's something,

      Comment

      • Bobby Henderson
        Expert Film Handler
        • Jan 2020
        • 925
        • Lawton, Oklahoma

        #4
        Overall, the movie studios just don't seem to realize how much "bigger" movies seemed to be in the public consciousness 20 or more years ago. Today movies seem small and very disposable.

        The very brief theatrical release windows are a big part of the problem. A 5 week window might be better than 17 days or whatever the new standard is, but 5 weeks go by pretty fast. The general public has been "trained" by these short windows. They now know they hardly have to wait at all to watch the movie on TV at home.

        A movie's short theatrical window is compounded by the next stop of the movie's life: falling into the dust bin of a streaming app user interface. I'm not exaggerating when I say a movie can be released in theaters and then completely forgotten within the same year.

        Think of how movies were marketed in the past. They were more visible back then. We used to see big ads of movies in newspapers. Not anymore. More outdoor advertising (billboards, bus bench ads, subway ads, etc.) was done for big releases. A movie's TV commercials could hit far larger audiences back then; TV viewership today is severely fragmented -especially in the coveted 18-45 age demo. Advertising online is kind of joke. I'll hear that some movie had a $60 million ad budget, but where is that money going?

        It used to take a lot more time for a movie to work its way through first run and second run cinemas in the US and go through cinemas in foreign markets. A movie could stay visible to the general public longer. And then as the movie's presence started to fade the home video platform marketing push would begin. Retail stores that sold movies (and music, books) would give the movie a new showcase. The same goes for all the video rental stores that now no longer exist. Today we get a shrinking movies section in Walmart. I can't remember the last time I saw a retail "end cap" for a DVD or Blu-ray release in Walmart. Most people are watching movies via streaming now -if they bother watch the movie or can even remember it exists.

        Most theaters are smaller now. They may be technologically better in certain respects, but they're smaller on average. Recliners are popular, but I'm not excited about paying a premium to watch a movie in an auditorium that doesn't feel that much bigger than a high school class room. There are very few venues in the United States that pass for flagship quality. I'm talking about a venue that's big enough and good enough to host something like a premiere event. Those kinds of theaters can allow a movie to build up hype.

        Maybe one of the biggest problems of all is young adults (Gen-Z, younger Millennials, etc.) don't know anything about the kind of movie-going experience older guys like me are missing. Their viewing experience is the bland, not-so-special thing we've had lately. It's very likely younger people don't value movies nearly as much as those in the Generation X and older age groups. If movie theaters disappeared entirely it might not bother them at all.​
        Last edited by Bobby Henderson; 03-17-2026, 11:06 AM.

        Comment

        • Mike Blakesley
          Film God
          • Jan 2020
          • 2021
          • Forsyth MT

          #5
          I tell myself that a lot. If my theater was to close tomorrow, almost nobody would miss it. If the marquee lights stayed on, the majority of people around here wouldn't even know it was closed.

          So of course our job is to WOW people with our presentation, sound, concession service (which is about a thousand times better than the bland "do it yourself" experience that AMC and probably others are offering) so that they'll keep wanting to come back. Since about 99% of our moviegoers are repeat customers, I guess that's working -- but we lose people all the time. Either they move away, get old and don't want to go out, or just get out of the habit of moviegoing. Some only come because they bring the kids, and then when the kids get older, they stop coming as a family. I'm not sure how to keep these people interested...because the movies themselves are so unexciting so often.

          I can't imagine having to fill even 6 or 8 screens now. I wish we had one more, but there are some weeks where even that might be too many.

          Comment

          • Bobby Henderson
            Expert Film Handler
            • Jan 2020
            • 925
            • Lawton, Oklahoma

            #6
            I'm starting to feel like commercial movie theaters are caught in a catch-22 situation in compounded multiple angles.

            One example: movie studios tend to make their movies for younger audiences. But it seems like middle aged people and older appreciate the movie-going experience more. If people my age and older can't relate to newer movies we're probably not going to show up to watch them.

            I probably wouldn't value cinemas as much as I do if I hadn't experienced things like seeing "Return of the Jedi" in 70mm when I was 16 or watching "Jaws" at a drive-in theater several years earlier. I lived in New York City during the peak of the 1980's 70mm blow-up era. I look back fondly on experiences like seeing "Lawrence of Arabia" at the Ziegfeld or "Die Hard" at the Baronet. The General Cinemas NorthPark 1-2 theater in Dallas showed me a premiere-class cinema doesn't have to be in New York or Los Angeles. Great quality cinemas could exist in any town now. Digital technology "democratized" the image and sound aspect. An expensive 70mm print is no longer a hurdle to gain multichannel or immersive surround sound. The trick is getting someone to make the investment in such a cinema and maintain it.

            Instead we have this issue where movie studios have been gobbled up by various media companies. Those companies appear not to care much about cinemas and look like they care far more about their walled garden streaming services and other related properties. If the younger Millennials and Gen-Z people are just as happy watching movies on their TV screens or smart phones that will help that media company business model work that much better.

            I think there will be all sorts of unforeseen consequences if the cinema platform were to mostly disappear.​

            Comment

            • Lyle Romer
              Pro Film Handler
              • Jan 2020
              • 383
              • Davie, FL, USA

              #7
              The problem is the studios don't make a lot of "good" movies. Back in the era when I worked in theatres (1990's), every week there was usually at least one new release that was at least worth the time to watch. Now, there are many times throughout the year where my wife and I WANT to go to a movie theater to see something and there is nothing playing that we want to spend the time to see even if the ticket was free.

              Comment

              • Bobby Henderson
                Expert Film Handler
                • Jan 2020
                • 925
                • Lawton, Oklahoma

                #8
                It's as if the movie studios only want to book big epic "tent pole" releases in theaters. There isn't enough of that to go around. Movies that are more "ordinary," such as comedies, romantic dramas, etc. are more likely to get pushed direct to streaming service platforms and bypass the cinemas. And that's if those kinds of movies are made at all. The major movie studios are making fewer movies.

                The 2000's era had some really great hit comedies, such as "The 40 Year Old Virgin," "Wedding Crashers," "Tropic Thunder" and more. We haven't seen much of that lately, certainly not in theaters.​

                Comment

                • Mike Blakesley
                  Film God
                  • Jan 2020
                  • 2021
                  • Forsyth MT

                  #9
                  The other dumb thing the studios do, every freaking year, is front-load the summer. Here's a list of major movies this summer.
                  5/22/26 The Mandalorian & Grogu
                  5/29/26
                  6/5/26 Scary Movie
                  6/12/26 Disclosure Day
                  6/19/26 Toy Story 5
                  6/26/26 Supergirl
                  7/3/26 Minions & Monsters (7/1)
                  7/10/26 Moana (Live Action)
                  7/17/26 The Odyssey
                  7/24/26
                  7/31/26 Spider-Man: Brand New Day
                  8/7/26
                  8/14/26
                  8/21/26 Mutiny
                  8/28/26 Coyote Vs. Acme
                  9/4/26
                  9/11/26
                  9/18/26
                  9/25/26
                  10/2/26 Digger
                  ​
                  One new big-shot movie every single week through the end of July (they did have the brains to give The Odyssey and The Mandalorian a week to breathe before the next big thing comes in) but then August, September....next to nothing. Why don't they spread all the good stuff in June and July into August and give everything some room to find an audience? (Disclaimer: There are obviously more movies being released, but the ones listed seem the most likely to be big grossers. I may have missed a few good ones.)

                  Comment

                  • Bobby Henderson
                    Expert Film Handler
                    • Jan 2020
                    • 925
                    • Lawton, Oklahoma

                    #10
                    For the Summer movie season that is a fairly paltry list of shows.

                    Comment

                    • Mike Blakesley
                      Film God
                      • Jan 2020
                      • 2021
                      • Forsyth MT

                      #11
                      That isn't ALL the releases, just the "known" tentpoles.

                      (Well, "Coyote Vs. Acme" isn't a tentpole, but I'm excited for it so I put it on the list.)

                      I'm just trying to show how the tentpoles SHOULD be spread out farther. It's like the studios don't think anybody has any money left in August.
                      Last edited by Mike Blakesley; 03-23-2026, 10:11 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...