The film ACME did not want you to see

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Harold Hallikainen
    Film God
    • Jan 2020
    • 1072
    • Tucson AZ

    #1

    The film ACME did not want you to see




    NEW YORK(AP) — Before it was dubbed “the funeral screening,” it was just when Will Forte was going to see the movie.

    “Coyote vs. Acme” was finished. Director Dave Green, inspired by “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” had completed the editing on the Looney Tunes blend of cartoon and live action. The whole project, which takes an Ian Frazier “Shouts and Murmurs” column from The New Yorker as its source material, was an audacious comic gambit that seemed to be paying off.


    Hopes were high. Audience test scores were good. But days before Forte, who stars as Wile E. Coyote’s attorney, could see “Coyote vs. Acme,” Warner Bros. canceled it. Not just the screening — the movie. The studio hadn’t delayed it or sent it to streaming. They were canning it altogether.

    “I just thought: ‘Well, they’re canceling the movie. It’s gotta be bad,’” Forte recalls.

    Forte and his wife, suspecting the movie must have turned out poorly, joined the cast and crew to say goodbye to the film no one else was going to see.

    “That was when the real emotions started,” Forte says. “It was everything I wished the movie could have been and more. It was so special, which made it so frustrating and so devastating. The confusion was amped up, then frustration, then just searing anger.


    “Then it made even less sense,” he adds. “We all looked around, like, ‘What’s happening here?’”

    The abrupt termination of “Coyote vs. Acme” sent shockwaves through Hollywood. Everyone in the movie business is accustomed to sudden, painful twists of fate. But the wholesale elimination of a finished film faster than you can say “Meep! Meep!” was something new.

    David Zaslav, chief executive of Warner Bros., was intent on pivoting away from the straight-to-HBO Max projects of his predecessor. The expected marketing spend — roughly $30-40 million — for releasing “Coyote vs. Acme” wasn’t worth it to the studio. It was better, the studio said, to take a tax write-off on the $70 million production. Along with two other releases — “Batgirl” and “Scoob! Holiday Haunt” — “Coyote vs. Acme” was put in mothballs.

    But nearly three years after that “funeral screening,” the movie is, like its ever-undaunted protagonist, back from the dead. After an outcry, Warner Bros. put “Coyote vs. Acme” up for sale. Ketchup Entertainment, an independent distributor that last year released the Looney Tunes movie “The Day the Earth Blew Up,” picked it up for about $50 million. On Aug. 28, “Coyote vs. Acme” will finally see the light of day.


    It’s been a dizzying turn of events for everyone involved. Eric Bauza, who voices Daffy Duck, Bugs Bunny and others in the film, didn’t really believe it until he saw “Obsession” at his local cinema.

    “Upon exiting the theater, there in a little marquee box was the poster for ‘Coyote vs. Acme,’” Bauza says. “It hit me: This is going to be seen by people.”

    In a recent interview, Green was still in disbelief.



    “I must be dreaming,” said Green. “It’s a total surprise I’m sitting here talking to you today.” Wile E. Coyote has his day in court


    The filmmakers and their new distributor have leaned into the project’s tortured history, promoting it as “the film ACME didn’t want you to see.” More than that, “Coyote vs. Acme” now has a newfound meta quality. The premise of the film is that Coyote, after suffering years of defective products, takes Acme to court. Like the drama surrounding the film, it's an underdog victimized by a big corporation.



    “I couldn’t help but look at the movie in a completely new way because there are meta crossovers between the story and what the movie had come to represent,” Green says. “It almost felt like we had written the movie after the news had broken.”

    When “Coyote vs. Acme” was canceled, its fate became a rallying cry. Filmmakers like Christopher Miller, Phil Lord, Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert championed it as too good to disappear. Even politicians, like Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro of Texas, urged the Justice Department to investigate Warner Bros.'s decision.

    Bauza, a veteran voice actor, pushed the hashtag #ReleaseCoyoteVsACME on social media. His most dramatic effort, though, was at the Annie Awards in 2024. There, he drew hearty applause for making that case from the podium — in the voice of Daffy Duck.

    “He’s the go-to cartoon character above anyone else when it comes to begging and pleading,” Bauza says. “It seemed appropriate.”


    So many people came out fighting for the film that Green never felt alone throughout the ordeal.

    “I would open my phone one day and see someone dressed in a Wile E. Coyote costume outside of the studio protesting with a sign in the rain — these kinds of things you couldn’t believe,” says Green. ‘The pipeline has changed’


    At the same time, the entire episode suggested a dark new chapter in the movie business that has left many involved with “Coyote vs. Acme” shaky. This wasn’t a young filmmaker getting turned down on their first film. It was two years of work on one of Warner Bros.’ most iconic franchises — a movie even produced by DC Studios chief James Gunn.


    “I don’t know what their judgment was,” says Bauza. “Did they even know or were they just looking at numbers? It’s tough looking in from the outside, thinking: ‘If that’s how the Looney Tunes are being treated, what about my story?’”

    “The pipeline has changed,” he adds. “How we get to the finish line is different.”

    “Coyote vs. Acme” was greenlit when studios were trying to find their way through the pandemic and theaters were struggling to stay afloat. But Green’s film now arrives at a much different point in time. Theatrical is thriving thanks in large part to the visions of filmmakers, from Christopher Nolan to Curry Barker.


    For Green, that “Coyote vs. Acme” is finally having its day in the court of public opinion is a sign of Hollywood returning to its foundations.

    “The film business, as much as it might not feel that way, is led and dictated by artists and filmmakers and actors and writers wanting to create,” says Green. “There will be nothing able to take that want away from creators. As long as we keep creating, there will be a movie business.”

    Forte is still struggling to find a happy ending. The movie’s initial cancellation felt, he says, “cruel and heartless.”


    “The downside is: Trust no one,” says Forte. “And the positive is: Don’t give up hope. And that’s the one I think I will keep.”
    ​
  • Mike Blakesley
    Film God
    • Jan 2020
    • 2021
    • Forsyth MT

    #2
    I hope it does well. It's quite irritating that the final trailer has not shown up on the TrailMix yet -- all we have is the lackluster teaser which has been out for six months or more, and a 30-second "TLR2" which is good but too damn short to really get the point across. I'd have loved to have that final trailer on with Spider-Man.

    Anyway, we're going to play it and I'm waving the flag pretty hard for it by talking it up to people. We'll see how it goes. The reviews are looking good, which is awesome.

    I think the biggest problem that Warner Bros. has with Looney Tunes is, since they're animated, everyone thinks they should be kiddie fare, but they're not at their best unless they're in PG-13 category -- which a lot of the early shorts were, if we're being honest about the violence. The other mistake they're making lately is, the animation is all done in that super-fast, ultra-manic, goofy-kooky style that the Illumination movies are famous for, rather than the more deliberate animation style of the shorts in the 40s and 50s that everyone today is familiar with.

    Besides -- All the classic WB directors are on record that their films were made for themselves (and other adults), not kids, so to me they'd be best suited to a more grown-up themed film that takes some chances.

    Comment

    • Marcel Birgelen
      Film God
      • Jan 2020
      • 3619
      • Maastricht, NL

      #3
      I also want this to be good... Not only has Coyote always been my favorite toon character (self reflection, I guess), but the Loony Tunes and associated characters are such an undervalued and underused asset.

      But... what a botched international release does this thing have?

      US: August 28
      UK: August 21
      NL: October 28
      DE: September 27

      So, by the time the thing is already on streaming and every pirate bootleg outpost on the planet, they think they can still release it to theaters in the rest of the world? Have they learned nothing?!

      Comment

      • Mike Blakesley
        Film God
        • Jan 2020
        • 2021
        • Forsyth MT

        #4
        Have they learned nothing?!
        Well, Ketchup is a small, inexperienced company, but when has any studio ever "learned" anything? They're literally like Wile E. Coyote -- they keep repeating the same mistakes and hoping for different results.

        Comment

        • Ryan Gallagher
          Film God
          • Nov 2022
          • 2855
          • Austin, Texas, USA

          #5
          I think it's high time studios start doing global releases on the same day. Timezones should be the only perceptual difference. The only way to actually generate buzz is to get as many people as possible to see things early. Now that we are in the digital domain mostly it is no longer a logistics/efficiency topic, or any other excuse they could dream up.

          Maybe they still harbor concerns about some countries being piracy risks, but at this point they are basically pirating the potential profits from themselves with the streamable versions becoming available before the global cinematic releases.

          Plus everyone knows how to use VPNs now... so even in the streaming domain the jurisdictions and alternate timings make zero sense.

          Comment

          • Marcel Birgelen
            Film God
            • Jan 2020
            • 3619
            • Maastricht, NL

            #6
            If there is one upside, then it is that in general, releases have become more consistent over the years. Multi-month differences in release dates between countries have become far less common than like 25 years ago. The only excuse they may have is dubbing and subtitling. But like Mike mentioned, Ketchup is just a small company and they most likely use other distributor's networks in different countries and those distributors will have their own agendas.

            Still, if this one explodes in the U.S. and there is some considerable buzz, it's really stupid and a missed opportunity the rest of the world cannot ride the same wave. Despite all our differences, it's one global world now, information travels around the globe in light speed...

            What I still don't understand is that in the digital age, DCP distribution still seems to be in the hand of a happy few service companies and studios. Why isn't there a decent alternative DCP distribution and licensing platform where smaller, independent studios, like Ketchup, can distribute their content. Where every exhibitor is free to sign up and where licensing content is just a few clicks away? Even in 2026, where digital distribution is a solved issue, we're still working with "bookers" and studio backed systems based on an "old boys network" that's essentially over 100 years old...

            Comment

            • Mike Blakesley
              Film God
              • Jan 2020
              • 2021
              • Forsyth MT

              #7
              I have always thought that antiquated practices and accounting systems are the main reason why we're still dealing with stupid "print counts" and unable to stack titles on the same screen. I don't know why they can modernize everything else but they can't modernize THAT.

              Comment

              • Harold Hallikainen
                Film God
                • Jan 2020
                • 1072
                • Tucson AZ

                #8
                When I was reading the original article last night, the line "The film ACME did not want you to see" made me laugh! After all the delays, it's a great promo line.

                ​

                Comment

                • Leo Enticknap
                  Film God
                  • Jan 2020
                  • 3572
                  • Loma Linda, CA

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Marcel Birgelen
                  I think it's high time studios start doing global releases on the same day. Timezones should be the only perceptual difference. The only way to actually generate buzz is to get as many people as possible to see things early. Now that we are in the digital domain mostly it is no longer a logistics/efficiency topic, or any other excuse they could dream up.
                  When I started as a projectionist in the UK in the late '80s, mainstream releases were typically 2-3 months after the US release, but there was an obvious, logistical reason for that: we got the American prints after their theatrical run was done, cleaned up and put on a boat. One chief told me the obvious way to know if the British censor had made cuts to the version as released in America: if most of the reels smelled of perchloroethylene (the fluid used in ultrasonic film cleaning machines), they'd come from the USA and been cleaned, but if one or two smelled slightly of bleach (the final chemical used in processing film), they'd come from a lab, meaning that the censor had gone to work on that reel and the copies had to be reprinted at a British lab as a result.

                  Unlike the other European markets, prints destined for the UK did not need to be subtitled or dubbed, so it made sense simply to clean up US prints and ship them to other English-speaking markets. Unless there were any censorship cuts, they could be reused as is.

                  But as Marcel points out, no such logistical factors apply to DCPs.

                  Comment

                  • Marcel Birgelen
                    Film God
                    • Jan 2020
                    • 3619
                    • Maastricht, NL

                    #10
                    We got a mix of recycled US prints and new prints during the mass-35mm-days in the late 90s and early 2000s. For subtitles, most movies had to go through the lab. Ever since the mid 1990s, they were engraved in with laser, which avoided yet another copy process.

                    Germany and France, where most international movies were dubbed were different though, they all had to get new copies. So I guess the best copies from the US went to the UK and the countries that could do with subtitled versions and the difference was made up with fresh copies. I was told that the big, prestigious houses would often get the fresh copies and the rest had to do with recycled prints.

                    I actually found two rare videos on YouTube of the laser-engraving subtitling process:



                    Interesting to see the typical DOS text interface, a good indication this thing is from the early 1990s.

                    Same process, different lab and probably a different machine, but now a close-up:


                    Last edited by Marcel Birgelen; 08-15-2026, 11:51 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Harold Hallikainen
                      Film God
                      • Jan 2020
                      • 1072
                      • Tucson AZ

                      #11
                      How the Anvil Was Nearly Dropped on ‘Coyote vs. Acme’

                      ​https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/26/m...smid=url-share

                      Comment

                      • Mitchell Dvoskin
                        Pro Film Handler
                        • Jan 2020
                        • 174
                        • West Milford, NJ

                        #12
                        Most fun I had at the movies since Roger Rabbit! Mr.
                        Coyote should get the Oscar for best actor.

                        Comment

                        • Mike Blakesley
                          Film God
                          • Jan 2020
                          • 2021
                          • Forsyth MT

                          #13
                          It did well for us. We only played it for one week, even though we got it on the break. It worked out just right. Fun movie too, although I wish they would use the Chuck Jones style of animation, rather than the maniacal Tex Avery style they seem to be fixated on. But, that's just because I grew up in the "classic Jones" era when so many of his would show up on Saturday morning TV.

                          I think they use the more crazed style because it's closer to what Illumination is doing with Dreamworks films, and we know how successful they are.

                          Comment

                          Working...