|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: All About Splices-some questions for you guys
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 03-10-2000 11:06 PM
Joe...I have used 1 inch wide opaque splicing tape on SRD before and had NO dropouts of any kind. Now that I'm local to you, swing by and I'll demonstrate the awesomeness of a real SRD penthouse!John Walsh...I think has come up with a nice little extra Christie should make. A clamp on light! John Pytlak...what's it going to take to get the fine folks at Neumade to modify their fabulous 35SS splicer to handle frameline tape? Any ideas??? I agree wholeheartedly that 8 perf clear tape should be the standard in the industry! Also, on breakdown, if the tape will not peel off, instead of losing the frame, PLEASE simply "tear" the splice and tape over the frame with the "unpeelable" tape. That way the next guy who gets that print can build it up with a modified splicer or perhaps even an ultrasonic. There's nothing more annoying than to me than to get a print that has been used only one time and there is an id frame, with a missing frame (where the last guy cut that frame out), spliced to a poorly cut third frame...meaning I must lose 4 FRAMES on EACH side of the splice. At least with taping "over" the original splice, there will be no residue and a new cut can be made. Heck, that next operator might even go to work on that frame and get that old tape off! Joe...a Christie projector won't jump with an ultrasonic, but it is a physical certainty that any tape splice will. That's why I just go ahead and leave the pre-cue on the trailer's leaders, as I feel it's less annoying than a jump at the start of the green band. (No I'm not crazy enough to sonic splice trailers. Egad on changeouts!) Gordon...after doing many rep shows, I wish the depots would let me voluntarily go down once a month and tell them which prints to save. I'd do it for free if they would just let me! There's nothing worse than getting a beat up repertory print.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-11-2000 12:39 AM
Ok, time for sorta pissed off rant:1) Our tape won't peel, period. The few times I did try it just left residue. I am not in charge of purchasing. I'll send a memo to our district, or rather get my manager too since I can't. I'll get back to you with the response when I get it next year. 2) At our theater the jobs of usher and projectionist are combined. Sunday nights through Friday afternoon's there is one usher/projectionist to run 12 screens. Friday nights through Sunday Afternoons there are 2. Oh, and since we're always shortstaffed in concessions, we've got to help out there too. 3) I am unofficialy in charge of our both. I have as my job responsibilities taking care of all the slide projectors. Their maintenance adn slide change outs. Projector maintenance. Tearing down/building 90% of the movies that come here. Adding/removing screenvisions ads, etc. Keeping trailer programs up to date with our current bookings (which is a hard job here, I'll go into more detail on this if you wish). Winding up trailers. Oh, and loading/starting movies, cleaning theaters, acting as doorman, helping in concession, helping in box, etc. So you can just take your elitist attitude and shove it. I would love to be up in the booth all day and only have to worry about film. I would then have time to make sure every splice was perfect-clear and pealable. But with all of the above going on I can't justify worrying about clear or white tape when the latter causes a barely noticable flash and ABSOLUTELY no sound problems at our theater. Oh, and on top of all that, I've been working at mininum wage for 2 1/2 years. Pride in ones work only carries so far.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-11-2000 12:52 AM
To continue the rant:And on top of all that, there are the things that are much bigger than splicing tape that are wrong here and haven't been fixed yet. Here is a short list for ya, I probably forgot some stuff: -Broken apature gate on one of our old Centuries. Make loading a royal pain in the arse. -Broken framing knob on another Century. MTS has told us the only thing to do is get a new projector head-which will never be approved in my lifetime. The movie is noticably out of frame on that screen, but there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. -Wrong apature plates with wrong screens. Some f*cking genius didn't realize each plate was cute for a specific theater. So now they're all mixed up. -Broken dousers on two of our Christies. They're being held up with masking tape. -Malfunctioning stereo sound head on a Christie. We gotta load it loose and put a rubber band on it, and it still doesn't sound good. -Dots appearing on film in one of our THX screens. See my other thread. So you can see why splicing tape would be low on my list of priorities. Oh, and what I menat by incineration is that at the end of a films run, after its been to the second, third, fourth, billionith run theaters, the film companies incenerate most of the prints. In the end this is a stupid argument. I've had audiences sit 30 minutes through a movie that was out of frame (mis-frame, not out of frame from the start, not my doing either) without a complaint. It is highly doubtfull that they're going to notice 1/24 of a second of film missing. [/rant]
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-11-2000 01:39 AM
Got so mad I forgot to address your original points, here goes:It is funny but experience has taught me that operators that don't care about the quality of there splices and how that effects their presentation You made some rather unfair judgments here. I do care about the quality of my splices. Our splicer gets cleaned regularily. I also follow brads guidelines for splicing, smoothing over the tape so that there are no air bubbles. As to how that effects our presentation, I seriously doubt anyone notices one frame of white splicing tape on a 20 minuter reel. That is 28,800 frames. One flash on a scene change is going to ruin your whole show? The point is mute anyhow, I'm using clear tape for reel splices now. are probably to busy to ever clean a projector Our projectors are thouroghly cleaned every day and wiped down between shows. let alone the lens Lenses/portholes get cleaned once a week. I would like to do them twice a week, but my eyesight is not perfect, or even close, and cannot be corrected. Hence it is difficult for me to focus. Taking out lenses everyday to clean them would be counterproductive, since the small amount of dirt on the lens would be less of a detraction from the show than the movie being out of focus. to busy to ever check the a chain levels I don't know what you mean by chain levels. Please explain, perhpas its something I was never shown before. and in many cases to busy to check if they have even threaded correctly and scratched a print. I always check to see if I threaded correctly and have never scratched a print to to misloading, never. They also are probably boasting about haveing threading contests as to who can laceup the fastest. I can thread quickly, yes, but I do not boast about it. I did take part in a threading contest once, but went back and carefully checked the work afterwords. Also since you seem to feel that films are incinerated at the end of the run well that is only partially true. Usually one or two prints are kept for revival and rep houses and they don't have time to check them so it may just be the one you didn't think was worth looking after and some one else will get stuck with your mess. How is losing one frame a mess? Oh, that's right, since I don't peel tape I'm a shitty projectionist, dragging my film across the ground, misloading projectors, splicing in porn frames in family movie, etc. Get off your high horse. I've never been so insulted in my entire life as I was by that post.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 03-11-2000 09:15 AM
Dustin, I don't think Gordon was insulting anyone, just commenting on how (sadly,) many people operate. The mere fact you are here, posting (not lurking) and reading means you have a serious interest, and are not a hacker.The main problem with this industry is that costs and the candy stand dictate everything. It's no wonder that no one, especially younger people, leave this job. Endless work, cheaply run theaters, low pay for high annoyance are killing the job. Since this forum is for people who like to get down to the nitty-gritty of projection, eventually there will be a big discusion of a minor point like splices. But no one is saying that "one way is the only way", or that if someone doesn't do it THIS way, they are wrong. You take whatever advice you can use and leave the rest. When I was first learning projection (25 years ago) the guy who taught me made a big deal out of how you should do _everything_ you can to keep the print in good shape. This was a point from which everything else in projection "hinged" around. It was almost as if your job was to protect film first, project it second. So if people say things like that, it usually just shows the way they taught, and maybe even the era they were taught. This is the way the industry was years ago; you did everything you could so that the next guy didn't have any surprises. Of course, some people still try to do that today, but there are far fewer because the old timers have died, and the younger guys have been forced to other jobs to earn a living. Now, it's totally different. It's a lousy job, with no pride (most "owners" are corprations, who's president never visits, so how can there be any?) Dustin, if you like, why don't you e-mail me your address, and I will send you a roll of the Nuemade tape. Try it for awhile. Maybe if you have a roll to show management, they will relent and buy some.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-11-2000 01:53 PM
A few quick points - don't clean lenses every day. Each time you clean the lenses, you scratch the surface and wear away the coating (assuming that your lenses aren't so old as to be uncoated). Once a week or even slightly less often is fine, provided that you are careful not to get gunk like projector oil and dirt near the lenses during daily operation. Porthole glass is another story; this is probably worth cleaning a few times a week; it's not usually coated and it's usually far less expensive than quality lenses.
Second, "A-chain" alignment is critical for good sound quality, and is much more important for a Dolby system than a mono system. An important part of a-chain alignment is matching the levels for the left and right channels; if this isn't done correctly, the Dolby matrix won't work properly and you will hear weird things like dialogue in the surround channel and other such nastiness. Anyway, the full procedure for soundhead alignment is explained in the manuals for Dolby processors. If you don't have a manual at your theatre, you can download one from this site and print it out. Proper soundhead alignment requires a buzz-track test film (expensive), an oscilloscope (expensive, but can be borrowed), a Dolby-tone loop, and a pink-noise loop. Since you probably don't have the buzz-track loop or an oscilloscope, you can only do the "regular maintenance" part of things, which assumes that your soundheads were aligned properly at one time and that the alignment wasn't disturbed since then.
Basically, to set Dolby levels, you take the Dolby-tone loop and run it through the projector. Depending on what Dolby processor you're using, you should have some kind of meter to display the signal strength of the left and right channels. There's a mechanism (ranging from a "push to align" button to manual level adjustments) to set the L and R levels to equal, standardized levels. It's really pretty simple and takes about ten minutes to set up two projectors. Be sure to clean the projectors afterwards, since test loops often attract dirt and drag it into the machine.
As for peeling splicing tape as opposed to losing a frame--yes, I agree that a single lost frame is no big deal, but think about what would happen if every theatre that got a particular print cut out frames. For a print that circulates among, say, twelve theatres, you'd be losing one second of film at each reel change (12 frames at each head and tail), which could cut off an important line of dialogue. Many repertory prints circulate among many, many theatres, so you can see the problem here. Also, imagine losing a frame on your company's policy trailer or Dolby trailer or something like that every time you re-attached it to a different print!
I agree that the white tape is terrible about being "peel-able." That's one major reason why I don't like it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-11-2000 02:13 PM
About aligning sound heads, MTS just went through all our projectors a month or two ago and did that. I'll look into making sure the Dolby processors are properly configured.I had no idea a print could be circulated 12 times. I suppose if I was dealing with used prints that I knew would be going on to several over people after me I would make a very strng effort to peel the tape. But there would be some important differences here that would allow me to do this: 1) I'd probably be running only one screen, allowing me to focus my attention on one film/projector. 2) I'd be determining my own purchases, lettng me buy the peelable tape. But think of it like this, back on February 18 we started 4 new movies and finaled 6. Two people did all the print tearing down/building up on Thursday night/Friday morning. Are you starting to see what I mean by "not enough time"?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-11-2000 03:40 PM
Well, obviously I care about my work. The fact I'm on these forums and the fact that I have worked for mininum wage for 2 1/2 years (and I will never get a raise unless the mininum wage goes up, that much has been said) proves that.To make my posistion clear: 1) I use clear, not whit, tape now. 2) Even though I do not think it is a big deal, I would peel if I was able. Our splicing tape won't peel, so I can't. What set me off was the way you insulted me in your post. I try to do the best damn job I can. You know what my training consisted of? They showed me how to load a projector. They showed me how to build movies ("um, heads first. Save a cheat frame on the heads and tails, use this tape, don't go to fast") how to tear down ("look for the splice, tape the heads/tails on with clear tape, one side. Don't go to fast"). That's it. Everything else I've learned has been self taught. Having you walk all over me for not peeling tape just got my goat.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|