Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Big Sky cue detector problem (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Big Sky cue detector problem
Steven Gorsky
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 146
From: Frederick, MD, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 06-12-2002 09:08 AM      Profile for Steven Gorsky   Author's Homepage   Email Steven Gorsky   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That would be a lot of splicing tape, that's why the fewer cues for credits/lights to half and end of show the better. Cues on policy trailers, and ads don't have to be removed so they can go on normally.

Steven Gorsky

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-12-2002 10:12 AM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, then, I suppose I'm up for the challenge. It will be good practice for when I do become a master booth tech, which I will be some day.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 06-12-2002 01:31 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I worked at a place that used reflective tape, which I hated with a passion. I was able to cut them in half so they would not show on 1.85 movies, but they still showed up on scope requiring hiding them. These things can really ruin the ending of a movie if the lights-up cues show on screen. Sadly when I left the people who are now working there don't see this as a big deal and don't even cut 'em in half anymore.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-12-2002 05:04 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken, the ENTIRE WORLD (and Jeff Skallan) is counting on YOU to deliver a solution quickly! Make those nasty cues disappear from the picture area forever! Don't make me do it for you!


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-13-2002 08:25 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Motion picture laboratories used to either notch or apply foil cues to the printing original to cue the printer to make color balance changes for each scene. This antiquated system has long since been replaced with "frame count cueing", where the changes are based on the frame count from the beginning of each roll, so nothing needs to be done to the film other than measuring the distance from a start mark to each desired change:
http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/support/h1/H1_86-91.pdf
http://www.rtico.com/bhp/pcsii.pdf
http://www.rtico.com/bhp/pcse.pdf
Frame Count Cueing
http://www.duart.com/site_main.html

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 09-20-2002 12:26 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
*bump* once more, with feeling

 |  IP: Logged

Wes Hughes
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 175
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 09-20-2002 12:35 PM      Profile for Wes Hughes   Email Wes Hughes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
aren't the big sky readers proximity type? if they are the cues will work on either side of the film. the cues are easier to peel from base side.


 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-20-2002 06:27 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the risk of getting shot down, I've seen what you guys can do when you gang up....

I HATE EDGE CUES... there I've said it.....

They cause a noticable picture movment as they go thru the gate and over the int sprocket and they wear with time..... Frameline cues don't cause any movement and suffer no mechanical wear so last a long long time. I have TA10's and the interval / end show cue is on the frame line. As its the most inportant cue it makes sence to have it there. Its the only cue that is ever likley to be left to do its own thing unattended if the duty projectionist is busy elsewhere. So it is important that it is reliable. All other cues are used when the projector is manned so if they miss its not too important and easily corrected manually.

There... I've said it so do your worst!

Oh... to deflect some of the flak... Brad I've just started to use Film Guard :0)


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-20-2002 07:09 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken, what kind of edge cue tape are you using? How do you apply it? There are actually multiple ways to apply cues on the edge without it being noticeable, while other ways are VERY noticeable like you pointed out.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 09-20-2002 08:43 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wes: The cues are optical. IR is bounced off them and back at a receiver. So no, they will not work on the base side.

I agree with Ken that edge cues can cause the picture to jump a little, but to me that is better than seeinig four rectangles flashing on the screen. And as Brad said, I'm sure there are ways of "Cues Done Right."

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-20-2002 09:35 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is the Big Sky just like the Xetron? If so can you run it sequintially rather then random cues? Then you would only have one piece of cue tape instead of up to eight. For example: pushing the start button would ignite the bulb, start the film, open the douser, dim the lights half way down, and select audio source for previews. First (single)cue at feature start would dim the lights down and change audio if needed. At the beginning of the ending credits, the second (single) cue would bring the lights back up to half light. At the end of the credits, the third (single) cue would bring the lights to full up, switch sound to non sync & close the douser. This way you wouldn't have all of the annoying cues (up to eight in a row), just 3 cues per film. Can you see one cue on a frame line at 24 FPS?

Rick

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-20-2002 09:42 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Rick, that's a great idea. I did not realize those Xetrons could be set up that way. There are none of them running in this area.

"Can you see one cue on a frame line at 24 FPS?"

Absolutely! It is very easy to see and is equally annoying.


 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-20-2002 10:00 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,
That was a feature of the Maxi12. I'm assuming it's the same in the Big Sky automation.

Rick

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 09-20-2002 11:29 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you buy the Maxi12 or early Big Sky automation (they are exactly the same, right down to the gerber artwork) with the cue detector, it can be set to operate in sequential or random mode via a switch ("S1") on the 1-32 PC board. The Maxi12 has a diode matrix, so you can pick which cue number does what "designed-in" function. In random mode, a specific action will occur when a specific number of cues go by; ie: 3 cues - go to flat/sr. In sequential mode, the automation will simply step through a preset list of functions when any number go by: ie: see a cue, perform whatever is set to diode line 1; see another cue, perform whatever is set to diode line 2, etc. When the failsafe detector drops, the automation resets to the beginning.

At Crown Theaters, we decided to use random mode, which is when you place up to eight cues in a row to perform the desired function. As Kyle listed prviously, we set it up as so:

1-end show
2- credits lights mid
3- flat/sr
4- scope/sr
5-surround EX (orginally we had this as flat/a)
6- scope only (orginally we had this as scope/a)
7- feature lights dim
8- interlock start (this function can not be changed)

When we set this up in the very late 1980's we had seen several cue detectors. At that time we thought there was too high of a possibility a cue detector could miss a cue. If running in sequential mode, every function would be wrong (out of step) from then on. We learned this lesson with our Cinemation system. In random mode, if it misses a cue, the next cue will still do the correct function. We also wanted to standardize cues on the print because we would transfer several prints between theaters, equipped with different capabilities. If you remember, at that time there were a mixture of mono trailers, Dolby A, and SR traailers and features and we wanted these to all be cued correctly and automatically.

We put a "3" or a "4" at the end of the exit snipe (first thing shown) so that sets the picture and sound format to follow. We could show a flat trailer in A, then a flat trailer in SR, in any order, then go to a scope feature in A. We use the same exit and policy trailer over and over, so cues only have to be placed on them once, which is why I don't understand why people complain about doing it. This can not be done in sequential mode unless the automation is "diode programmed" for each show - highly impractical.

We put a "7" cue at the beginning of the policy to bring the lights down. We thought that since the features change, we would put the fewest number of cues on the print; a "1" cue to end the show, and a "2" cue for light up at credits. Both the "1" and "2" cue should always be placed after the fade-out and just before the end rating where the image is usually all black to reduce being seen.

Several operators dislike our using random mode, but it was the only solution that allowed the flexibility we needed at the time (hindsight is always 20-20.) Some people want us to change to sequential mode now since it is true that trailers are now avaiable in both flat and scope, always SR, etc. But while I am looking into that, I'm in no hurry to change. For example, we have several CP65's with EX units. How do we make it turn on EX when required? Now, I just put on (or take off) a few cues and where ever the print goes, if there an EX unit, it will work. Besides, it's something that's been around for over 10 years and worked acceptably. Also, sometimes good design means leaving things the way they are because everyone knows it and it has always been that way (closely linked to; "If it ain't broken....").

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-21-2002 04:54 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad... the cue foil we use is pre cut aluminium self adhesive. We use this so it is a regular size rather than cutting bits off a roll of foil tape.... I've seen bits of tape big enought to wrap a parcel with!! The cues are approx 20mm x 10mm

They fit perfectly between the edge of the sound track and the edge of the perforations when placed on the frame line. When placed on the perforations we use about a third of a cue and place it in the same orientation in line with a frame line so it is hardly, if at all, noticable.

All are placed on the emulsion side, although the FM35 is able to read from the emulsion side as well. The cues are easy to remove and don't normally leave any residue, unless they have been on for a very long time.

We often get films in with foil applied longways over perforations and it is very difficult to remove without causing some damage to the film itself. On our stock leaders we tape over the edge cues for protection as they get mechanical wear. Some of the leaders we have are well over a year old and have the original cue's still on them.

The other point about edge cues is they cause plops and bangs in analogue. In SRD they can cause reversion even if applied on the inner edge!!

So for me personally edge cues are a no no..... unless you can convince me other wise.

I'd expected a lot more flak from you guys.... I feel left out :0(

Regards Ken.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.