Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » The Incredibles Print - Reel Change Indicators (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: The Incredibles Print - Reel Change Indicators
Ian Joseph Parfrey
Film Handler

Posts: 56
From: Bollier Queensland Australia
Registered: Sep 2004


 - posted 11-05-2004 04:43 AM      Profile for Ian Joseph Parfrey   Email Ian Joseph Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ahhh! Good old Eclair. Did they lose their cue marker or something? [evil]

I wonder how the German Geyerkopie prints fit into the SMPTE standards with their square motor cues? I reckon it's a good idea but it's probably a solution to a problem no-one needs.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-05-2004 01:04 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I presume Eclair and LTC's thinking is that most of the prints they produce will never be shown on a changeover system at all during their lifetime, so there's no point in putting unnecessary marks on them. Where that thinking falls down is in the presumption that those places which do run changeovers will apply a form of invisible cues or inscribe visible ones properly.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Joseph Parfrey
Film Handler

Posts: 56
From: Bollier Queensland Australia
Registered: Sep 2004


 - posted 11-05-2004 03:59 PM      Profile for Ian Joseph Parfrey   Email Ian Joseph Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suppose it's one advantage having Cinemeccanicas, clickers sound REAL loud so there is no way you'd miss a c/o. [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

David Yauch
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 206
From: Mesa, AZ, USA
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 11-06-2004 01:58 AM      Profile for David Yauch   Email David Yauch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of our incredibles print had still had the good ol' black oval at the beginning and end of one reel, the rest were the i.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-07-2004 12:07 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jarrod Cocker
or cigaret burns, whateva,
FWIW, that was only in the movie "Fight Club". I've never known anyone, anywhere, in my 30 years in the business, who's called them "cigarette burns". Sounds like something someone in a single theatre heard (who went on to write a screenplay), and figured everyone called them that.
quote: Johnny P.
there shall be 18 frames to the beginning of the runout section of the trailer.
That's the old standard... it's 24 frames to the runout section.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 11-07-2004 12:42 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tim Reed
That's the old standard... it's 24 frames to the runout section.
And the NEW Standard (SMPTE 301).

24 frames: SMPTE 55, the Universal Leader, which counts down in seconds.

18 frames: SMPTE 301, which counts down in 16-frame units of "film feet".

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-07-2004 08:55 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, that was a direct quote from the current standard, SMPTE 301-1999. I recall that Jeffry was on the Working Group that wrote it and developed the printing masters, along with Jess Daily of the UCLA Film Archive and Tom Kuhn of Deluxe Laboratories.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-08-2004 10:34 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why the difference? The visual cues only purpose is for manual C/O done by a human. Seems like the reaction time of a projectionist wouldn't change because of the type of leader. If he could hit the change-over at the C/O cue in time before black hits the screen with only 18 frames, why increase them to 24? The increase in frames after the C/O cue will just increase the number of frames that will not be not projected, assuming the projectionist's eye-finger reaction time remains the same (why shouldn't it?). Or am I missing something here?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-08-2004 03:19 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think it has ever been said (or written) that the projectionist is supposed to punch the changeover button as soon as the second set of cue marks appear. In fact, the projectionist is supposed to wait as close to 1 full second (assuming 24 extra frames) as possible. I can usually hit it pretty close when I run changeovers manually by watching for cue dots, but I'm probably still snipping off 2-5 frames. I've always preferred to put a small piece of white artist's tape on the first black frame of the tail leader. That way once the motor is started, I simply watch the upper loop on the outgoing projector and as soon as I see the white tape enter the trap, I punch the button. When using the tape method, I am assured of showing all but maybe 1 frame on the outgoing reel.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-09-2004 01:10 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, as do I. If the print has been plattered as nearly all have that I run, I don't even need the extra visual....the splice itself is easily enough seen going into the gate. In the Simplexes, you can see it hit the framing window and that is three frames from black.

But that still begs the question, why two different numbers of frames; why change it? Many projectionists still go by cues alone. If the older guys do it the old fashioned way, by cues alone, then they have learned to mentally time when to push the c/o button. Now that timing, that one-count, that "beat" if you will, will be different....and for no good reason that I can see. And what's worse, is he now supposed to memorize two different "beats" -- one for footage sync leaders and one for seconds sync leaders? Again, what's the point of having two different number of frames from the last cue to black? So some anal guys on the subcommitte can have it nice and neat -- on the seconds leader, one second to black and on the footage leader, one foot to black? It's silly.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-09-2004 09:51 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Assuming a lack of gratutious splices between the c/o cue and the tail, you can also do it by ear -- listen for the tail splice entering the gate and do the changeover.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 11-12-2004 07:13 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The dual standards (dueling?) were created in 1965 with the publication of the proposal for the SMPTE Universal Leader.

The television film industry quickly adopted the Universal Leader standard. The motion picture exhibition industry generally kept using the original "Academy" leader standard, adding new information as necessary.

Some laboratories adopted the Universal Leader and cue mark spacing. Others kept using the "Academy" leader and cue mark spacing. At least one laboratory kept using the "Academy" leader but converted to the SMPTE Universal Leader cue mark spacing.

The SMPTE Working Group on Leaders and Cue Marks (L6.38) Preliminary Report (1988 October) "confirmed that virtually all broadcast material is now distributed on tape", "that the parties affected by the leader are almost exclusively theatre, post-production and archival projectionists", and that "the changeover cues vary from one lab to another".

N. R. Olding, Subcommittee Chairman; "The SMPTE Universal Leader for Release Prints," Journal of the SMPTE, 74:34-35, 1965 January.
quote:
History
For many years the "Academy Leader" was in general use. In this leader the count-down was based on 16 frames of 1 foot of 35mm film, a holdover from the silent films in which the 16-frame spacing was equated in terms representing feet of film or seconds in running or projection time.

In 1950, the growing use of film in television production made it evident that some changes were highly desirable. An SMPTE Subcommittee under the chairmanship of C. L. Townsend was set up to revise the Academy Leader to fulfill the new requirements. This subcommittee, in cooperation with producers, laboratories, projectionists and broadcasters, developed a new All-Purpose Leader, commonly called the Society Leader; it was accepted for trial and has since served the industry. That Subcommittee considered 24-frame spacing for threading cues; but the change in spacing was dropped to avoid confusion.

Since 1951, private and commercial use of 16mm and the use of 35mm and 16mm film by television broadcasters has increased rapidly. In 1958, the requirement for 24-frame, 1-second, spacing of threading cues, to fit in with projection and TV cuing practices, was again brought to the attention of officers of the SMPTE and was passed by them to the Television Committee Chairman, W. T. Wintringham, for action.

quote:
Although it was not to become part of the leader, in order to standardize on the seconds basis, the spacing of the motor and changeover cues has been reduced from the present 172 frames to 168 frames or 7-sec running time. The Subcommittee had hoped to reduce the changeover cue to 5 sec but yielded to pleas for more time to permit older machines to reach stable operating speeds.
SMPTE 301, designed to be exclusively a motion picture projection leader, returned to the Academy Leader specifications for 16-frame units (film feet) and cue mark spacing.

[ 11-13-2004, 10:19 AM: Message edited by: Jeffry L. Johnson ]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.