Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Proper/Improper use of FilmGuard (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
Author Topic: Proper/Improper use of FilmGuard
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2006 04:50 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any item that is soaked is saturated, but an item that is saturated is not necessarily soaked.

I haven't read the FG directions in a while, but maybe there should be a paragraph stating: "It's not necessary to have the pad be dripping wet...just filled (saturated) with Film-Guard. Methods such as dunking or soaking the media pads are NOT recommended because the media will become soaked (that is, overly saturated)."

I have used Brad's suggested method of saturating the pads and then leaving them a couple of days. It works well, although there is still some streaking. ETS prints don't arrive until Friday for us, so we can't ever pre-screen anything except TES prints. Never had a complaint about the streaking though.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Burtcher
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 194
From: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 06-02-2006 05:39 AM      Profile for Robert Burtcher   Email Robert Burtcher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okay, so if I'm understanding this thread right, when saturating the media pads, you want them visibily and uniformly wet, but not to the point where a little drips off as you're applying FilmGuard to them? Or what?

I have been saturating the pads to the point where a drop or two will fall off the pads, then I'll blot a little off so that they will not drip. Is is too much?

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Fields
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 545
From: Ohio, United States
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 06-02-2006 08:38 AM      Profile for Matt Fields   Email Matt Fields   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
FWIW, I just spray until the film-guard reaches the core all round, but not until its dripping. If I spray till it drips, somtimes I'll get streaks on the second run though (first public show). - Matt

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-02-2006 09:03 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
...the rolls are plenty long to cut into halves...
I start by using a full roll, uncut for the first movie, rewinding it back to the starting point for each run. Then, when it's time to clean a second print, all I have to do is cut off the used portion and throw it out.

This saves a lot of time and trouble in pulling all that media out and rewinding it again. It also circumvents the problem of getting dirt on the clean media if you drop it or get something on a surface where you are working.

The only drawback is that you have to learn how to judge how much media is left on the roll. If you guess incorrectly it is liable to run out on you before the film ends. (A bad thing, obviously!)

Further, if you have soaked the media rolls prior to using them, they will have set out for a day or more, thus allowing for the "rest period" mentioned above. If the pads are dried out from sitting too long, all that is needed is a quick spritz to freshen them up.

When soaking the rolls, I use enough F.G. to wet them right up to the point where they drip, but not actually dripping. Again, that is a judgement issue. Once you do it a few times, you learn how to tell when enough is enough.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-02-2006 09:33 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Randy...how do you get any tape to stick to the unused but now soaked portion of the media?

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-02-2006 10:54 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't.

First, put the fresh roll on the TAKEUP side of the cleaner. Then rewind the media onto the PAYOUT side, onto a plastic core. You can soak the material with FG, little by little as you rewind if you like. (Wind about 10-15 turns then give it a squirt. Wind another 10 turns then squirt again. Repeat until done.)

When you've got it all wound onto the payout, put a plastic core on the takeup. Next, thread the media and pull one corner of it in between the notches of the plastic core. Then, when you rewind it will be trapped between the two interlocked cores. The media won't be able to slip even if it's all slippery with FG. But, once you get a couple-few turns around the core it will usually hold itself in place just by tension.

If you are using the FT media, you can forget about the winding process. (Bonus!) Just put a fresh roll on the payout and an empty core on the takeup. Trap the corner and make a few turns to cinch it and you're ready to go.

I have thought of a couple of possible modifications to the plastic cores that will make this process a bit easier. If I have time to experiment and get it right, I think I can make it so tape can be dispensed with, alltogehter, even if you don't soak the media all the way to the end.

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Meredith
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 126
From: Jackson, MS, USA
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 06-05-2006 05:26 PM      Profile for Christopher Meredith   Author's Homepage   Email Christopher Meredith   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would like to offer a public apology to the author of the email previously quoted in the original post. I meant no disrespect toward that individual and certainly did not want to give offense. I realize now that posting an internal email, even with no names attached, is imposite, discourteous, and unprofessional. To anyone who may have been affected my my actions, I humbly apologize.

For whatever it's worth, my original intention was not to reflect poorly upon REG or any of its members, but rather to get feedback from the designer and frequent users of a very good product. Again, everyone, please accept my apology.

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 06-06-2006 01:19 AM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, many people lurk on this site. Chin up dude, I've been there before. They'll get over it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarrad Salmon
Film Handler

Posts: 25
From: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia
Registered: May 2006


 - posted 06-06-2006 07:47 AM      Profile for Jarrad Salmon   Email Jarrad Salmon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was touched on before in the previous posts, but I'd like to confirm that allowing the media pads to soak over night prevents the steaking on the first run.

I personally believe that streaking is a direct result of a media pad being over saturated and unevenly applied.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-06-2006 10:03 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Chris, although you're posting the internal memo probably is a tad impolite (not the litany of horrors you listed), you didn't post the writer's name and your only intent was to get more precise information; it was hardly a personal attack on the moral and ethical verasity of the author (who evidently is pretty thin skinned if he made a big deal about it). Besides, we don't even know who he is nor do we care; he should be more concerned good booth practices and jumping for joy that he's got a worker who is eager to learn how to do things the correct way. Next time, just paraphrase anything that you have a question about rather posting a direct quote and risking the wrath of whoever.

And not for nuthin, as we say in Brooklyn, he'll get over it.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 06-06-2006 02:09 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
FWIW, I didn't read it as disrespectful, but it's probably not a good idea to quote someone's internal email like that. If anything it's good to know there's someone in a technical management position at a large chain who's interested in properly using Film-Guard to improve the company's presentation. And he/she should be patting you on the back for caring. [beer]

We won't mention another large chain of CINEmas whose tradeMARK is "We don't need no stinkin' Film-Guard!" (is that still the case there?)

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-06-2006 04:45 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For clarity, RULE #6: Quoting other people's emails in the Film-Tech Rules and Policies says "Do not do this ever!" So regardless of politeness, etc., it would be wise to hold to it.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-06-2006 06:35 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Jarrad

Welcome to Film-Tech. How's the FG working out for you guys there now? Solved the shedding issues?

John

 |  IP: Logged

Jarrad Salmon
Film Handler

Posts: 25
From: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia
Registered: May 2006


 - posted 06-11-2006 09:06 PM      Profile for Jarrad Salmon   Email Jarrad Salmon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Wilson
Hey Jarrad

Welcome to Film-Tech. How's the FG working out for you guys there now? Solved the shedding issues?

John

Thanks John, this site as a great resource!

The shedding isn't normally major problem thanks to film guard, but certain film stocks do seem to need it more than others. That said the hardest thing for us is 16 screens, 20 to 30 prints, one film guard unit! [Eek!] Have to come up with a tight film guard schedule each week.

More units on the way though! [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 06-11-2006 11:35 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's funny, Dave ... and they could use FG on those Christies real bad....since they have the units that can accept the Kelmars...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.