|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Penthouse digital readers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 11-17-2007 07:27 AM
Brad...all of eggs in one basket? How so? The readers themselves are separate, using separate LEDs and often with separate LED supplies. What is common? The drum? It better be spinning properly or you'll have film damage soon. Better to have digital drop to let you know of a pending failure than to gleefully run in digital and not understand why the film is being damaged or if you have something without digital tell you that your spare tire is flat.
The counter arguement is that with a penthouse you have twice as many failure points.
Mark's problem is a curious one. Just in case...are you running the latest firmware in the CP650? It is 2.3.5.something now (I forget if it is 2 or 4 on that last digit). I always thought it was unfortunate that the penthouse people eliminated the sprung roller that was present in the Cat 699...it was a nice debouncer that took some of the shock off of the closed loop system.
Monte...how the digital decoder deals with speed variations is up to the people that write the code. You need to allow it to deal with speed variations as John noted but how fast is a matter of opinion. My opinion is that it should never be audible. However, that means it can only adjust for speed slowly and that may also mean it will need to use a large enough buffer to deal with catching up to a suddenly faster running machine. But, then again, other than start up or changeover, when is a projector going to suddenly change speed? A clever programmer should have special case algorhythms for those situations as they are known (speeds starting below the minimum are start up...changeovers have motor start signals, changeover signals and such). Once the speed is set for a particular start up...it should be a very slow change if the speed varies to avoid noticable wow/flutter.
DTS went through this problem too a while back (one of those dark firmware versions between 1.29 and 1.46). They had to deal with changeovers between dissimilar machines that have different speeds. Unfortunately, they took a special case and tried to apply it as a general fix. Most changeover houses have identical machines for both and even if there are variances between the two (presumming async motors), it shouldn't be real different to need such a drastic speed change instantly.
John....CUE MARKERS....some machines are indeed right on 24fps to three decimal places...those with good frequency inverters and good motors. I've stobed machines where they they were spot on. We recently conveted some DP75s to inverter drive using some Bodine motors and Lenze controllers and upon verifying the speed with a strobe using the shutter as the target...it was frozen (also indicating little slop in the gear train too). Now, not all motors/controllers are created equally...in fact, the reason I strobed the unit was to see how off they were...I've found several low-cost inverters that put out "about" 60Hz. The Lenze AC-Tech inverters we used on this particular project were not very expensive as inverters go so I was curious.
With sync motors now the norm in most cinemas/screening rooms, odds are, the speeds are quite close to 24.000fps but more importantly to this topic are not varying around by any signficant amount as that would require the line frequency (not voltage) to be varying.
Steve
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|