Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Iron Man prints have locks (here we go again) (Page 9)

 
This topic comprises 10 pages: 1  2  3  ...  6  7  8  9  10 
 
Author Topic: Iron Man prints have locks (here we go again)
Ben Goodman
Film Handler

Posts: 32
From: Danbury, CT
Registered: Apr 2008


 - posted 05-06-2008 02:20 PM      Profile for Ben Goodman   Email Ben Goodman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only part of the MPAA's process that is not under their control is what happens once the movie hits the streets. If they have leaks with screener DVDs or lab problems, that's more likely to be their problem and something they can rectify. If they give out the 90% number to theatres and theatre owners, they instill a sense of fear in floor staff to be more vigilant about screen rips.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 05-06-2008 02:26 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since when does saying that camcorders are involved in 90% of pirating mean that you and I are felons?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-06-2008 02:48 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe that was a typo...in this article from today's imdb.com it's 50%.

IMDB link

New York A Hotbed Of Pirates, A.G. Says

New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, claiming that 50 percent of all pirated movies are sold in New York, has chastised judges for being too lenient with those caught taping movies in theaters with camcorders. Cuomo told a New York news conference on Monday that first-time offenders should be fined as much as $1,000 and up to a year in jail and that repeat offenders should be charged with committing a felony. (Currently movie piracy is treated as a misdemeanor.) "We need a new law on the books of the state that punishes this act like the crime it is," Cuomo said. Also attending Cuomo's news conference were MPAA chief Dan Glickman, writer-comedienne Tina Fey, and NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-06-2008 03:16 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yah, they throw these numbers around like they are tossing salad.

quote: Chris Slycord
Since when does saying that camcorders are involved in 90% of pirating mean that you and I are felons?

Well, Chris, they are not saying that off-screen rips are off Hollywood private screening rooms, are they! They are saying they originate in MOVIE THEATRES where you and I are employed. That can only mean either we are doing it ourselves, or we are allowing crime to be committed in our places of business. And whether or not that is said directly, that's the impression the public has. Seinfeld couldn't have written an episode around it if it wasn't the general perception.

We used to have a saying in grade school, "Be careful, cause you never know which it is." Meaning, some nuns are mean and nasty and would wack you with a ruler as soon as look at you, and some nuns were gentle and kind. But when you are talking in the corridor and you saw a nun coming at you, having that foreknowledge -- be it right or wrong -- it always made you question, usually in panic, is this going to be one of the good nuns or one of the mean nuns?! Hence, "Be careful, cause you never know which it is."

I dislike the idea that the MPAA's two decade long anti-piracy campaign, starting with Valenti's assault on the pirating thieves who were using those new fangled VHS machines to record...er,"steal" movies off tv broadcasts and after loosing in court, then moving on to this constant single note tune about the theatres' role in Hollywood's multi-billion dollar losses....this has made it so that the general public looks at theatre personnel with that same kind of suspicion as we looked at that nun coming at us.

I don't like the idea that if I tell someone I run a theatre or am a projectionist, they're thinking, "Hmmmm, I wonder if this is one of those guys who makes bootleg copies of the movies in his theatre." Luckily I can tell them, "Not to worry, I only run OLD movies...they have already been pirated by the first run theatre projectionists." [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-06-2008 03:56 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"losing." "Loosing" is something altogether different.

A lot of piracy happens in theatres. It's not nice to hear, but its true.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 05-06-2008 04:25 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Frank,

When someone says "Lots of piracy happens in theaters" you assume that this really is intended to be "Lots of piracy happens in theaters and the exhibitors are actively helping."

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-06-2008 09:59 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Which brings us back full circle to the thread topic....
quote: Chris Slycord
When someone says "Lots of piracy happens in theaters" you assume that this really is intended to be "Lots of piracy happens in theaters and the exhibitors are actively helping."

Yah...that's what the LOCKS say to me loud and clear. If theatres not actively helping, then if the MPAA numbers are even partially accurate and not just pulled out of it's collective arse, then theatres must be helping, at the very least, by culpable indifference to all these multitudes of off-screen rips.

And I guess I've pretty much worn this out by now so I am done -- but there is still no love lost between me and the MPAA.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-06-2008 11:57 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: David Stambaugh
What would the MPAA gain by lying, i.e. the 90% camcorder statement? I mean I don't understand why they would grossly inflate that number.
Why? Because they want to get the exhibitors and the public paranoid about piracy at the theater level (camcorder copies) and tone down the studio's own fault as much as they can. That's why. I don't buy 90% for a second because last summer I was introduced to someone through a friend of a friend and he was commenting on how he was able to get almost any movie in a perfect copy before the release date through his internet sources. He was very much against camcorder transfers because of the quality and said he never bothered downloading those. He even had a bunch of movies he had downloaded on his video ipod he showed me and indeed these were NOT camcorder jobs. They were clearly some kind of DVD rip with a professional transfer.

90% my ass! [fu] 50% is at least a believable number, although I would like to see some facts to back that up by someone other than the MPAA.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 05-07-2008 01:21 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
If theatres not actively helping, then if the MPAA numbers are even partially accurate and not just pulled out of it's collective arse, then theatres must be helping, at the very least, by culpable indifference to all these multitudes of off-screen rips.
And I say that the numbers don't say anything about individual owners at all, regardless of the legitimacy of said numbers.

Call me naive if you must but I feel that any owners that are actively helping are few at most and also see the indifference you speak of just meaning that the recorders make sure to avoid getting caught. Granted, if it's shown that a specific theater has been hit repeatedly that would mean they'd need to fix something in their "anti-piracy" plan.

Though I concur with both you and Brad that the 90% sounds quite inflated.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 05-07-2008 09:29 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well I don't deny that MPAA probably inflates that number by quite a bit, just to raise the fear level. That doesn't mean camcording doesn't occur. Individual theater owners, GMs, etc. know where they are with regard to the issue and the VAST majority of them are undoubtedly not involved in any way whatsoever.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-07-2008 09:47 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The problem is that the hand-waving and made-up numbers just destroy any credibility that the MPAA (and friends) might have had when they discuss piracy. If they offer numbers that cannot be taken seriously, then why should anyone take anything else that they say seriously?

I don't think that anyone here would oppose anti-piracy measures if a) it could be proven that piracy results in reduced ticket sales (which is probably true in general, but which hasn't really been demonstrated conclusively, at least to my knowledge), and b) the anti-piracy measures actually did something to prevent piracy (unlike locks on cans).

Right now, the MPAA appears to be either clueless or lying or both, which doesn't engender any sympathy from most.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-07-2008 11:29 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
And it just so happens that this particular bootleg of IRON MAN which got Cuomo on is high horse in the first place was a satellite transmission capture, NOT an off-screen copy
I am still curious about this....

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 05-07-2008 02:20 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So am I. Did you really mean to say it was a satellite capture or just a theft from a studio copy?

 |  IP: Logged

Rene Ferron
Film Handler

Posts: 52
From: New Brunswick, Canada
Registered: Feb 2008


 - posted 05-07-2008 08:14 PM      Profile for Rene Ferron   Email Rene Ferron   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One thing for sure ALOT of illegal copies comes from the "inside".

As an example, that the movie 88 Minutes. A popular torrent site released a DVD quality on 27/02/2008 and the official release date for 88 Minutes was 18/04/2008. So how can this be ? there is no CAM version of it, just a strait DVD quality.

But the first version of Iron Man that i've seen online was a CAM version.

 |  IP: Logged

Danial Simmonds
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 107
From: Kota Damansara, Selangor, Malaysia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 05-07-2008 08:20 PM      Profile for Danial Simmonds   Author's Homepage   Email Danial Simmonds   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I bought this DVD at a shop, it was a good copy.. it was not original and definately not a cam copy because it had 5.1 sound and the picture was amazing... and this was even before it showed in the cinema!

Definately holding films does not help, they have became more professional in making dvd's i guess.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 10 pages: 1  2  3  ...  6  7  8  9  10 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.