|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Where is the proper place to cut following the second set of change over cues?
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-06-2008 04:40 PM
quote: James Westbrook Derrick is one of the reasons management should meet employee applicants when they bring their application back..."I'm sorry, we are not hiring at this time."
No, no... The correct, phrase should be, "I'm sorry, we don't have any positions for you."
Note, I didn't say I didn't have any positions. I said, "...positions FOR YOU."
Subtle difference in phrasing. Big difference in meaning. But, "truth in advertising", always.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-07-2008 11:19 AM
I don't think saying, "I don't have a position for you." is PC.
I think it's 'telling him like it is' in a polite, businesslike manner. One of the things that peeve me off the most is when people dodge the question, "Did I get hired?" by hiding behind the telephone or some silly policy. The guy (potential applicant) deserves the minimum respect of an answer.
You could say, "No. You're not hired." but that makes you look like the A-hole. You could use the old line, "Don't call us. We'll call you." but everybody knows that's pretty much a put-down, these days.
Saying "I don't have a position for you." is a simple, polite way of saying, "I looked at your application and I don't have any jobs that I think you are qualified for." It's short, sweet and it gets the job done.
Plus, it doesn't make you look like the A-hole.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 05-07-2008 01:36 PM
Randy, you say that like being an asshole is a bad thing.
There's nothing wrong with being thought of as an asshole and in fact there is a lot of good associated with it. Being an asshole is the fastest and most efficient way of getting ahead in this world, and has been for a long time. I'm not saying that nice guys don't get ahead too, but it's rare. Very rare.
So I say work on being the biggest asshole one can be, especially towards sensitive PC types, and be proud of the resulting reputation. Do that and one will go far. A lot farther than by trying to not offend everyone.
Most people today, like our recently and dearly departed Derrick, not only deserve but need to have an asshole being constantly in their face.
No one respects a nice guy. People may like them, but they don't respect them. Nice guys are weak. Nice guys are wimps. Nice guys are losers. Nice guys always finish last. When something needs doing, an asshole will always be the best man for the job.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-07-2008 03:53 PM
I understand about that, Paul. In the case of a kid like Derwood... or Darrin... or whatever the hell his name was... I agree with you.
I also generally agree with your policy of "radical honesty". It doesn't do anybody any favors to be "artificially nice" to them when they don't deserve it.
I guess I was thinking more about the case of a regular applicant for a job in a theater or some other business. In that case, it is in the business's interest to give the "bad news" to the applicant in a "nice" way but, still, a "direct" way. Saying, "I don't have any openings for you." is about as nice, yet still direct way I can think of.
If, after being told, "I don't have a job for you." the kid pushes the issue, you probably have the go-ahead to open up on him. "You're not qualified." "You are too immature for the level of responsibility we expect our employees to stand up to." or anything else that is true but doesn't stoop to a personal insult would be fair game to say.
I think it is incorrect to equate being "polite" with being "PC".
It is also situational.
There are times to tell somebody, "That's wrong..." and there are times when, "It would be better if..." is the right thing to say. In certain situations, it is even okay to tell somebody, "No. I want you to do it this way..." is all right. You have to know the situation and gage your response to match.
In a theater where you are dealing with the public, the first line of response should be the "Polite but Direct" way. When the person pushes you past the line of polite response, a "less nice" response may be called for.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 05-07-2008 10:03 PM
quote: Tim Reed And whenever they don't, I just beat their ass.
My favorite quote from Babylon 5: quote: "It's like I always say, you get more with a kind word and a two-by-four than with just a kind word."
Marcus Cole
I'm going to adopt Joe's sig motto, "You need a beating today" as my approach to dealing with life from now on. I like the idea of administering a good beating to a deserving someone on a daily basis and the beatings don't even have to be physical. Yelling at and insulting people works almost as well. Hey, it works for my heros like Gordon Ramsey or the character John House on TV, or James Cameron on his movie sets, or even John Sununu in the White House during the reign of Bush I. Like those guys, I am known for not suffering fools well. But obviously that's not enough. Seeing how life's spoils always go to personalities like these, I really want to cultivate a reputation for being a blunt, non-PC, but passionate asshole.
* * * * *
There was a topic around here somewhere...
I too used to have short paper templates for both heads and tails under the glass on my rewind bench. Made it easy to find the cut point if the changeover occurred in black. Also, one can almost always see a difference between the feature's black and the tail black if one has good enough work lighting.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|