Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Changeover on Inglourious Basterds (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Changeover on Inglourious Basterds
Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 09-19-2009 12:42 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
PAY ATTENTION. There is no substitute.

I dare say, the guys at the Academy would blow no more changeovers if they had no bells...it is a bad crutch to have.

Don't hold back Steve, tell us how you really feel. [Big Grin]

I have run theatres with and without bells, makes no difference to me at all. My room at UC Irvine is without bells and I have yet in 12 years to miss a changeover. The layout of the booth is odd so visibility to the feed reels is poor so I wouldn't mind bells, but don't really need them.

Hell, when I ran my 4-plex in Downtown L.A. (Potts Alpha Platters and Wrong prototype consoles with the really noisy fans) I could take naps between show starts and if any machine even burped I'd be up like a shot and know exactly which of the four was acting up without looking.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-19-2009 04:49 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
Is this masterpiece of TV history available anywhere online?
A quick search showed it up as The Forgotten Lady. I read some of the script and it seemed to be the right episode, but it's possible they used the same scenario in another episode I guess.

Regardless, type in 'Columbo Forgotten Lady Bittorrent' into Googlybear and there she be.

I have run plenty of Changeovers and never had bells. I can count on one finger the amount of changeovers I missed in all that time. (I was doing my fifth double shift in a row and it was a midnight show on 2000's of some horror show. I'd nodded off and heard the end of reel splice go through. 8 seconds later it was back on.) That's the only time a bell would've come in handy. Those other thousands of shows a bell would've just been superfluous and a darn annoyance. They seem like another thing to help those 'attentive-deficient'.

I did some shows at a friend's theatrette where he had a small, dull light that came on near the operator's seat at the back of the theatre so he could run the shows and still enjoy most of the movie. Handy in those instances.

quote: David Stambaugh
They did changeovers at that time and the projectors had the bells, and yes they were VERY audible in the auditorium.
Any sound that can be heard in the auditorium that's not actually eminating from the film's soundtrack should be eliminated asap. That's just poor showmanship.

 |  IP: Logged

Warren Dewey
Film Handler

Posts: 28
From: monterey ca usa
Registered: Jan 2006


 - posted 09-21-2009 12:47 AM      Profile for Warren Dewey   Author's Homepage   Email Warren Dewey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The alarms in the theater I trained in back in the day were the single-clang emulsion-scratcher type. Later I would see the bicycle-style bells in other guys booths and really wanted a set. I found the ones I have now in a box of parts. They have the rubber ladyrinth like the Hatke, but it says Avanel Industries, Hyde Park NY on them. They play a syncopated 3-note pattern.

Warning: if you need to open one of these up (one of mine had a spider's nest inside, thus preventing proper operation), you WILL lose the ball bearing. The first and second times it hits the floor, you will find it after some anguished searching, but if you drop it a third time it's all over.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 12:56 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Wilson
Any sound that can be heard in the auditorium that's not actually eminating from the film's soundtrack should be eliminated asap. That's just poor showmanship.
So you're not a fan of letting infants into the theater either, eh? [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-21-2009 02:40 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nor is he a fan of fire alarms. We should just eliminate the sound so people can continue watching the movie not distracted by it (but shortly after distracted by their impending death). [Big Grin]

edit: And only after I wrote this did I notice that it ties back into the movie in question nicely.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 09-21-2009 02:55 AM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would much rather hear a bell than someones jowls sloshing and slurping soda, burping, crunching and knashing large wads of popcorn with blatant disregard for quality sound reproduction.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 05:34 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
Nor is he a fan of fire alarms. We should just eliminate the sound so people can continue watching the movie not distracted by it (but shortly after distracted by their impending death).
I was actually talking about other sounds like air conditioning blowing too much air or rattling air cond ducts, squeaking chairs but you go with whatever you want to get rid of.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-21-2009 07:18 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You took that seriously?

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 04:02 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nope.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 09-29-2009 09:43 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On the topic of the projection equipment in "Inglorious Basterds":

I seem to recall reading about and also someone once told me
that Nazi Germany and later Communist China modified all their
theater projectors to use 27 or 28mm film. The idea behind this
was that by going to a non-standard film size, they government
could assure that there were no unauthorized showings of
"fobidden" films from the West.
Anybody else know anything about this?

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 09-29-2009 03:14 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never heard of it; 28mm was a gauge of film, but it was obsolete before the Nazis came on the scene. They did ban 17.5mm in France, but that was a case of promoting the standard format and taking an alternative one out of use, not the other way round. Nazi films were certainly made on 35mm. I've no knowledge of China, but this sounds rather unlikely

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 09-29-2009 04:13 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IIRC, 28mm was a home movie format, on safety stock. It was perforated 4 holes per frame on one side, and one hole per frame (at the frame line) on the other -- so it could not be misframed.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Gordon
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 580
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Aug 2005


 - posted 09-29-2009 04:39 PM      Profile for Paul Gordon   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Gordon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
28mm was safety stock printed on non-flammable diacetate stock...

It was used for screenings in community centers, on farms, churches and schools etc...

I have catalogs that go up to the early 30's but it was phased out with expansion of 16mm

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.