Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » IMAX at the Regal Colorado Center 9 is the worst I have ever seen (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
Author Topic: IMAX at the Regal Colorado Center 9 is the worst I have ever seen
Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 08-10-2012 04:38 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dave Macaulay
I don't know if there is any 3D Dome system operating today, but these use a matte screen and shutter glasses.
There is one location in the world that I know of, that is still using 3D on a dome with shutter glasses. Unfortunately, I did not yet have the opportunity to see it. It is in Futuroscope, a theme park in the South West of France. Futuroscope quite probably has the biggest IMAX density per square mile anywhere in the world, alongside the biggest diversity in IMAX technology. Unfortunately, most of it seems to be pretty tied up with some distinct attractions, so there is just a limited or no choice of movies to be made in a particular venue/attraction.

Furthermore, I really would love to see some real "made for the Dome" content on the IMAX Dome (aka Omnimax) for once. Wide angle nature scenes work pretty well on the dome, but anything getting to close to the camera looks awfully skewed. I've never seen a feature length movie on an IMAX dome, but I don't think I will like it.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-10-2012 11:24 PM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The very first IMAX theaters (such as the Pictorium theaters at the Marriott Great America theme parks in Santa Clara, CA and Gurnee, IL) had almost 1000 seats each. (980 from some literature I have seen). These theaters opened within the parks in 1979. "To Fly" 1976 was my first IMAX experience at the Santa Clara Great America. I must have been around 7 or 8 years old (early 1980's)

quote: Marcel Birgelen
Furthermore, I really would love to see some real "made for the Dome" content on the IMAX Dome (aka Omnimax) for once. Wide angle nature scenes work pretty well on the dome, but anything getting to close to the camera looks awfully skewed. I've never seen a feature length movie on an IMAX dome, but I don't think I will like it.
I've never seen a natively shot Omnimax film on a dome screen, I think there were only one or two titles* ever released in true Omnimax but I have seen a few feature length DMR releases projected onto a dome at the Hackworth Imax in San Jose. Needless to say, it doesn't work very well at all. For starters, when framing for full 4X3 aspect ratio of a traditional IMAX screen, you want to keep the horizon and eyeline down in the lower third of the frame. Features framed for traditional aspect ratio are tolerable on a flat screen, but on a dome completely fall apart. The eyelines are midway up from the bottom into a "zone" of the screen where a pincushion effect starts to alter the image. The extreme top of the frame is squeezed into a tiny distorted U shape. All in all it's very unpleasant to look at.

*Three titles in Omnimax: "Garden Isle - 1973" "Omnisphere - 1983" and "The Dream is Alive 1985"

 |  IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-13-2012 08:17 AM      Profile for Dick Vaughan   Author's Homepage   Email Dick Vaughan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Stephen Furley
Are there any plans to install digital IMAX in Bradford, and if so will it be in addition to, or replacing, film?

Not at present,they wouldn't fill the height of our screen and they are not inexpensive. We have a Christie 2K alongside our IMAX SR system but this is used for pre show slides, ads,trailers and some standard DCP holdover performances from our other two cinemas.
quote: Stephen Furley
Have you forgotten the anaglyph print of 'We are Born of Stars' which ran at Bradford many years ago when you had the original system there? Was that unique, or were there any other anaglyph IMAX films? I've never heard of any others.


No I haven't forgotten it and we still have it in storage. I was referring to current IMAX 3D screens. WABOS ran as a double bill along with Skyward a standard 2D short from the same EXPO.

quote: Dave Macaulay
Using the shutter glasses along with polarizers gave reduced ghosting with almost no brightness loss, and this was used at the New York Lincoln Square IMAX and possibly other venues. It may have even had a name, "Crystal 3D" or something.
So, yes, there was "Imax" 3D content in 15/70 anaglyph. And yes, currently all Imax 3D screens are silver with their resulting and unavoidable hotspot.
I don't know if there is any 3D Dome system operating today, but these use a matte screen and shutter glasses

The shutter glasses gave a really good image but were a)very expensive to buy , in the order of $250-350 a pair , which meant anti theft sytems had to be put in place to stop customers walking off with them, b) very labour intensive to clean, they couldn't be put through a dishwasher style machine and had to be washed one pair at a time on a specially designed unit and c) very heavy to wear , even after 40 minutes you came away with neck strain.
I think there were around 20-30 E3D installations including the short lived London Trocadero but as far as I know they have now all gone.
The headsets could also be used with Sonics Personal Sound Environment where there were small speakesr inside each headset.

quote: Sean Weitzel
I've never seen a natively shot Omnimax film on a dome screen, I think there were only one or two titles* ever released in true Omnimax but I have seen a few feature length DMR releases projected onto a dome at the Hackworth Imax in San Jose.
There were other films shot specifically with domes in mind , Seasons for example which was made for the Science Museum of Minnesota. http://www.smm.org/omni/seasons

Of late more Giant Screen film producers are making special dome prints of their films with altered contrast and framing.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 08-17-2012 06:02 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
in all honesty, I hate dome screens, the presentation of 'The Polar Express' I saw up in Syracuse New York, made me want to barf, the fishbowl imagining was visually distracting to say the least.

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 09-03-2012 10:57 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw this again today at 1:10.

Picture-wise, the flickering was still not a problem for me. And I sit too close to notice aperture issues at the edges of the screen. It did seem to dim to me, more so than it did back on 7/22. But I still found it to be very watchable, and was thrilled to see what was possibly my last 70MM IMAX screening.

Sound-wise, there was a huge difference from before. The bass was thunderous, and the audio was excellent.

Thank you again, Joe, for your complaint that lead to getting the audio fixed. I'm Buddy Pine to your Bob Parr. I hope someday I can be as discerning as you.

And bravo to Regal for actually fixing it. If you ever show a 70MM IMAX print of a film I want to see again, I'll drive down from Broomfield, past 2 of your competitors. But not if you continue only with 2k LieMax.

I think I enjoyed TDKR a bit more the 2nd time. Lowered expectations helped. It has lots of faults, but is a big, sensational film.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-27-2012 03:49 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Edward Havens
Did any theatre operator ever attempt to get THX certification for an IMAX theatre? I mean, when THX certification actually meant something.

The Mitsubishi IMAX Theatre at the California Science Center in Los Angeles opened in 1984, billing itself as the only IMAX Theatre in the world that was THX-certified. There was no THX snipe before the film, but the voice intro stated it, and poster boxes had the THX posters as well as newspaper ads. The two rear surrounds were of the JBL direct radiator type that were THX certified. The certification was dropped a few years later (possibly around the time Mitsubishi dropped its sponsorship). The theatre closed and was torn down when the new, much larger IMAX opened as part of the expanded museum. (the original IMAX was on the small size).

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 12-28-2012 07:27 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Paul Linfesty
The Mitsubishi IMAX Theatre at the California Science Center in Los Angeles opened in 1984, billing itself as the only IMAX Theatre in the world that was THX-certified.
So, they had two sound systems present in the same auditorium I guess?

And, they also had a baffle wall for their front speakers?

 |  IP: Logged

William Kucharski
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 244
From: Louisville, Colorado, United States of America
Registered: Oct 2012


 - posted 12-02-2013 11:18 PM      Profile for William Kucharski   Email William Kucharski   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did Catching Fire at the Regal Colorado look badly upconverted in the non-IMAX scenes to anyone else?

There where a few scenes where you could clearly make out the pixel structure. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-03-2013 07:45 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While I did not see it at the Regal Colorado, I did see it in IMAX-D. I wouldn't call the presentation terrible, but it is no IMAX 15/70 that's for sure.

 |  IP: Logged

William Kucharski
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 244
From: Louisville, Colorado, United States of America
Registered: Oct 2012


 - posted 12-03-2013 10:14 AM      Profile for William Kucharski   Email William Kucharski   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
… but it is no IMAX 15/70 that's for sure.
Nothing is. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-03-2013 07:22 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lol, nothing comes close to 15/70 although IMAX is claiming that there new laser projector system will exceed it. We'll have to see what happens I guess.

I am not against Liemax as generally you kind of know what you are going to get. The theatre I attended was a purpose built IMAX theatre inside a multiplex. The picture was very bright and some of the images looked fantastic while some of them did not. There were a few scenes where the filmed in IMAX sequences looked great in Catching Fire while some others were not so great. The screen was about 65-70 wide and I would say 50 feet tall? It was not a mammoth purpose built screen it was on the smaller size that is for sure. Overall I found the showing to be pretty good, I like the fact that I do not have to watch any commercials in an IMAX presentation just the actual upcoming IMAX trailers and there only two of them, I also liked that there was reserved seating, and the sight lights from anywhere in the rear six rows were pretty decent.

Funny enough, the largest theatre in this complex has a screen that looked to me to be something like 80 feet wide in scope. It was a former THX house. I guess IMAX can't claim "The world's largest screen" at this location [puke]

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-04-2013 10:57 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
I am not against Liemax as generally you kind of know what you are going to get.
No, not really. IMAX refuses to notify customers in any way whether the theater is using 15-perf 70mm projectors or a pair of HDTV resolution video projectors. That's why a lot of people refer to it as "LieMAX". If the company continues this approach they won't make any mention of a 2K theater getting new 4K laser projectors. Customers will probably have to get any information about that stuff from third parties rather than anyone from IMAX. As far as IMAX company reps are concerned, all IMAX-branded theaters are the same, whether they're running 15/70mm film, 2K video or 4K video.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-04-2013 12:01 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby, that is bullshit I know exactly what I am going to get with IMAX in my area. There are no more IMAX 15/70 anywhere in my area except for two classic IMAX locations that show documentaries, but both are 90 minutes away and both do not show Hollywood fare. So watching a Hollywood movie in IMAX 15/70 is not an option for me. For the most part, the consumer has no choice if they are attending multiplex theatre with IMAX, they will be watching IMAX digital. The closest IMAX 15/70 location that is showing Hollywood movies is the Detroit location that is too far away. The chances of someone coming across a 15/70 Hollywood presentation are rather limited.

Also, the facts are that there are no more MPX 15/70 locations in the United States, they have all been converted to digital.

I like 15/70 IMAX far better than digital IMAX, but it is what it is, so move on.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 12-04-2013 01:18 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
Bobby, that is bullshit I know exactly what I am going to get with IMAX in my area.
Bullshit? Terry, are you dense or something? Why do you think IMAX got tagged with the LieMAX name?

Terry, where specifically did you find out the information about what kind of projectors are being used in the booth at the IMAX theaters in your area? If you say you saw it on IMAX' web site or any advertising from IMAX you're full of it. Customers have to find out by third party information outside of IMAX or actually look into booth through the port glass themselves (if that's even possible).

To this day IMAX has flatly refused to list any separate distinction on its web site or any of its advertising between true IMAX theaters equipped with 15-perf 70mm film projection and those that are merely digital. Their theater map shows 4 theater types: IMAX 3D, IMAX, IMAX Dome and Coming Soon. No difference between film or digital. And I will not be surprised if their map shows no distinction between 2K and 4K theaters once the 4K projectors start being installed.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 12-04-2013 01:32 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby, I think you need to educate yourself a little before you start calling someone dense. You are starting to get a little annoying.

quote: Bobby Henderson
Their theater map shows 4 theater types: IMAX 3D, IMAX, IMAX Dome and Coming Soon. No difference between film or digital.
Go back and read what it says. Under IMAX Theatre and IMAX Dome they both say they are using 15/70 technology.

Under IMAX 3D they say they are using both IMAX Digital and IMAX Retrofit for film. However, this a little outdated and likely has not been updated for a while now.

IMAX does not have anymore 15/70 MPX IMAX locations, that is fact, there is no getting around this fact. I know this is fact because IMAX themselves have said this and written this fact in financial paperwork that is released in their 2012 financial report. This paperwork can found on the IMAX website.

I copied this right from their paperwork.

IMAX MPX. In 2003, the Company launched a large-format theater system designed specifically for use in multiplex theaters. Known as IMAX MPX, this system had lower capital and operating costs than other IMAX systems and was intended to improve a multiplex owner’s financial returns and to allow for the installation of IMAX theater systems in markets that might previously not have been able to support one. As at December 31, 2012, there were no MPX systems in operation compared to 6 MPX systems as at December 31, 2011. The IMAX digital system has supplanted the MPX system as the Company’s multiplex product. The decrease in the number of MPX systems is attributable to the upgrade of existing MPX systems to IMAX digital systems.

quote: Bobby Henderson
or any of its advertising between true IMAX theaters equipped with 15-perf 70mm film projection and those that are merely digital.
Complete bullshit. IMAX says they are using DLP technology right after the IMAX countdown trailer and just before the feature presentation. I saw this on Gravity in 3D and I saw this on Hunger Games Catching Fire.

If you see an IMAX movie in any of the nine Cineplex locations in my province, you will be seeing an IMAX digital presentation. That is a fact, there is no way around this fact.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.