Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » SAMSARA not in 70mm - only 4K digital (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: SAMSARA not in 70mm - only 4K digital
Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 10-15-2012 06:40 AM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Victor Liorentas
Is anyone doing 70mm right where 4k is humbled a little?

Fear not, I saw The Master very recently in a superb 70mm presentation and rest assured that it blows even the flawless 8K>4K restoration of Lawrence of Arabia out of the water!

IMO Samsara works very well in 4K because it is principally a documentary. But...again in my opinion, for dramatic storytelling, video - no matter how sophisticated it may be - does not engage to the extent that film does.

Had the eminent filmmakers behind Samsara been able to go back to the negative and strike a small number of 70mm prints, this would have added another dimension to the picture; it would have been the full experience. Who knows; it might still be possible.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-15-2012 08:16 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is impossible to say that Samsara at 4K looks as good as 70mm since one is not afforded a comparison. Based on strict numbers, the statement is false. 4K is approximately the resolution of 35mm 1.85. As such, an EK print in 35mm should have looked as good or better than the 4K version. A properly struck 70mm print should have substantially more information on it than the 4K presentation. The 70mm print should have a greater color gamut too. But again, without a comparison, the statement, on its own, has no basis.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-15-2012 10:38 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Paul Gordon
Deluxe in Toronto shut their lab down a few months back. Vision Global out of Montreal is doing all their release prints.
Interesting. We have no more affiliation with 35mm houses at the office, all have long since converted, but the last prints I saw were the worst I'd ever seen and they were coming from Deluxe Toronto, which I was under the impression was the only lab still making release prints. Who is supplying the bulk of 35mm prints for the theaters that have not yet converted?

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Gordon
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 580
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Aug 2005


 - posted 10-15-2012 11:42 AM      Profile for Paul Gordon   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Gordon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In Canada its Vision Global and Technicolor in Montreal, though Technicolor is shutting down very very soon. I think thats it.

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Schulz
Master Film Handler

Posts: 387
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 10-15-2012 01:19 PM      Profile for Daniel Schulz   Author's Homepage   Email Daniel Schulz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Deluxe Hollywood is still printing film, and AFAIK is supplying the bulk of 35mm release prints for the North American market.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-16-2012 12:37 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
At least they were better than Deluxe Canada, but it is clear the quality has dropped to nothing based upon the last 35mm prints I saw.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 10-22-2012 12:44 AM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Fear not, I saw The Master very recently in a superb 70mm presentation and rest assured that it blows even the flawless 8K>4K restoration of Lawrence of Arabia out of the water!
I have always been a really big proponent of 70mm presentations, but I saw "The Master" in 70mm at the Ziegfeld in NYC and the print had positive dirt on it from end to end and it was also not projected with enough light. And the print was only 7 days old when I saw it. The image was crisp, but except for those few scenes near the end where he drives off in the car, there were no great landscape shots that really warranted 70mm (and it was 1.85, not 2.2). I doubt that anyone who saw the print that I saw thought that 70mm was superior to either 35mm or a normal digital presentation. It was incredibly disappointing. But assuming they scan from the 70mm, I'm sure the Blu-ray will look great.

I don't know whether the dirt was a lab problem or whether someone dropped the film on the way to the platter, but if that's the way film is going to be handled because of problems in the lab or because of the lack of trained personnel in the booth, then we're better off with digital. You'd think I was watching a 30 year old print.

If your print was in great condition, which I'm guessing it was from your description, then I have to assume there was a problem in the theatre. Which would also be a shame because some of the best presentations I've ever seen were at the Ziegfeld.

 |  IP: Logged

Derek Young
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Stockwell London England
Registered: Aug 2012


 - posted 10-22-2012 03:55 AM      Profile for Derek Young   Email Derek Young       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Brian,
Can you say where you saw the 70mm screening.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 10-22-2012 06:32 AM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Derek, have replied via PM, and will confine comments about other films to their respective threads.

Apparently there were also some picture corrections made during the DI process for Samsara (removal of extraneous items in some shots, selective colour changes).

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.