|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: the future of 4K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 02-22-2017 05:22 PM
quote: Frederick Lanoy Yes but what about the 3D ? Does anybody know if Dolby Cinema is able to do 4K 3D ?
Yes, both IMAX Laser and Dolby Cinema can do 3D in 4K. IMAX Laser is able to do 4K/3D at max 60fps, while Dolby Cinema can do 4K/3D at max 30fps.
As both master their own DCPs, they are not limited by the fact that so far there is no official DCP spec for 4K/3D. They can do whatever their hardware allows.
How many of their sources/masters actually justify the use of 4k, I have no idea. I guess the number is small, but growing.
With previous 3D systems, their low brightness, contrast, separation figures, ghosting, etc., I never felt 4k was worth the effort to have with 3D - too fuzzy overall to actually see 4k. Now with very large screens, higher contrast and brightness laser projection, the excellent stereo separation of the color separation 3D, I guess 4k makes more sense.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tyler Purcell
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 180
From: Van Nuys, CA
Registered: Dec 2015
|
posted 02-22-2017 09:45 PM
I've been to three Dolby theaters and none of them were any good.
The TV Academy's theater is Dolby and it has white hexagonal lines going through the image on any highlights. The AMC Burbank and El Capitan theaters have the same problem, which is clearly being able to see the DLP imagers grid.
Also, the Dolby cinema's don't have special content made for them. They play regular movies, not designed for HDR display. Where IMAX tweaks all their content pretty heavily, making the experience more integrated. I've seen a few Laser IMAX movies and that system is beyond leaps and bounds better then the Dolby system. It has richer blacks, it has warmer colors as well. The dolby system is harsh looking, it's not as pleasing to watch as the IMAX system.
I assume most of these issues are early days of new technology. Clearly defocusing the projectors will help slightly, but the lack of HDR content isn't going to change. Doing post for HDR is a nightmare because you need to have HDR equipment in the post house that matches the theaters, which is very expensive. If Rec 2020 becomes a practiced standard, we may see things change as it's dynamic range is higher then our current P3 standard, which is to say the least antiquated.
In terms of 4k... yea it's a joke. Netflix, Amazon and a hand full of internet distributors are really pushing for 4k, but the studio's still dictate how things are delivered and even though almost every movie today is made in 4k or higher, finishing in 4k is an expense a lot of them aren't willing to make, even with the cost being not much more then 2k. It's a real shame because there are a lot of 4k cinemas, plenty to merit a 4k release, it just doesn't happen.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|