|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: When to swap a bulb?
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 02-04-2015 06:17 AM
Leo...I've had Osrams blow up in the box in shipping (both film and digital)...I've had an Osram XBO-3000W/HTP arrive with its anode rolling around in the envelope yet not exploded (and they wanted us to file a claim with the shipper, not them). They suck and they have sucked for a long, long time.
Every lamp manufacturer has their good and bad batches. I'm not expecting 100% all of the time. But with Osram...35-years of personal experience with them have driven me to the conclusion that they are just an unreliable lamp with way too much hassle on warranty. If they work for you, more power to you.
Mind you, I've tried a great many lamp brands over the years...when I was with a chain, we would put lamps "head-to-head" in identical systems and tried to draw conclusions as to which performed the best...including down to the cost/hour. I've tried X-Cel (Marble), Conrad-Hanovia, Osram, Christie (Ushio), ORC (eventually now ASL), Superior Quartz, Goldberg (more explosive than any of the above) and Phillips (LTI). Christie/Ushio isn't just a little better...it is a LOT better than the alternatives.
I had a customer that only wanted Osram but was disappointed with the life with them, particularly in one of their consoles. They let me put a Christie in there and it made him a believer and has been on Christie/Ushio since.
Of the low-cost lamps, honestly, ASL has been the best we have used. There have been a few explosions (depends on the model lamp...they seem to do better with some than others or perhaps they had bad batches) but they are wonderful to deal with and don't fuss on warranty. Some of their lamps stand toe-to-toe with Christie/Ushio...the XM6000HS/G, for instance, puts out identical light to the CXL-60SC and lasts at least as long. The XM4202 is also a winner with a lot of light for a 4KW. I haven't played too much with their digital lamps though. They only have a couple of lamps on the Barco list and I don't think any on the NEC certified list (and Christie only recognizes their lamp, officially). Thus far, Ushio (Christie) have really just proven themselves to our customers as a hassle free lamp (about 99% of the time...there is that odd one that doesn't go the distance).
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 02-04-2015 10:47 AM
Maybe the pattern we're starting to see is that Osram's smaller bulbs are OK (e.g. the 1.6es and 2s), but the bigger ones simply aren't as consistent or reliable as the competition? At my current workplace, we use Ushios in our two NEC digital projectors: 6kW in one, and in the other a 3kW for 2-D projection and we swap in a 7kW one for 3-D shows, plus whatever comes built into the cradles of our iS8-2K in our smallest screen. One pair of film projectors uses 6kW Christie bulbs and Osrams (4kW) are in the other. I'm not sure if these are a conscious choice, the only brand our supplier carries in those ratings and configurations or just the way things have always been done.
I have noticed that while the Ushios and Christies tend to make it to warranty hours and still look good, the Osrams quite often don't get that far before starting to flicker. As I say, I never had that problem with the much smaller Osrams I used in England in the '80s and '90s. But there again, I haven't been here long enough to be clear in my own mind whether this is a consistent, long-term pattern, and if it is, whether the bulbs are the only relevant factor.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 02-06-2015 08:59 AM
Cinema Technology Magazine published lab visits for all major Xenon manufacturers and you could see how different their manufacturing processes were and how delicate Xenon manufacturing still is. Quite interesting read.
Here's the one covering OSRAM:
OSRAM lab report
Here's Philips in LA:
Philips lab report
I can't find the one on Ushio right now.
OSRAM can't be as bad as Steve suggests - they would have left that market behind long ago - with the same replacement and burst coverage warranties like Ushio and Philips, no Xenon bulb manufacturer can deliver substantially bad quality. The site I mentioned has piles of Osram only boxes in their booth, they run through 15-20 bulbs a year, it's an owner operated business, they would change to Ushio if they wouldn't be satisfied with OSRAM. They can't be the only lucky ones.
That said - if we'd operate Xenon machines, I would opt for Ushio, too, as they also offer a nice product variety. Hmm, as a matter of fact, we do, as we have no choice ;-)
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|