|
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Star Wars Attack of the Clones
|
|
|
|
|
Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 05-11-2002 10:41 PM
>>Anyone noticed the irony in the fact that the main 1 sheet poster for this film is drawn by that great artist Drew? and not done on a Mac like 99.9% of posters nowadys?<<The artist's name is Drew Struzan. Drew Struzan is my all time favorite poster artist. He has done scores of posters during the 80's and early 90's, and is the artist that George Lucas comissioned to do all the Star Wars (and the latter two Indiana Jones) movies, and several Star Trek items as well. Drew also did the second 'Harry Potter' one-sheet. ...and I agree 100% that it is so refreshing to see movie posters with HAND DRAWN ART on them as opposed to a giant photograph or digital image. -Aaron
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 05-12-2002 06:04 PM
AGGH! For almost twenty years I have been misspelling Drew's last name?I feel like a total idiot now  thanks for the link!!  -Aaron
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 05-12-2002 10:43 PM
I'm happy to see Drew getting some work. Although, his work on the "Episode II" poster is not his best ("Back to the Future" is still my favorite of his). Having a formal BFA degree in illustration, the state of movie posters is a favorite rant and bitch complaint of mine these days. In the last 10 to 15 years, computers have done terrible harm to movie poster art. So much of it these days is just boring head photography shots of actors (and badly Photoshopped at that at times, just check out Kevin Spacy's neck on the art for "K-Pax" --just what in the hell is that!? They put the anti-turkey neck blur to full maximum). It is a very very rare occurence to find great movie posters being done by great illustrators like Drew Struzan. I miss the days where you could find a great Amsel poster like "Raiders of the Lost Ark" or "Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome". I miss seeing movie posters being done by guys like Bob Peak. His poster art of "Apocalpse Now" is 1000 times better than some boring Photoshopped collage of actors heads. What about Boris Vallejo? Sure, that guy paints lots of Conan murals in oil, but he also did the "National Lampoon's Vacation" poster and can create images more compelling than just straight photography. There are some fellows these days doing really good work with computers. I forget the name of the guy who did the poster art for "Lord of the Rings" and "Pearl Harbor", but that guy knows his shit when it comes to manipulating photo imagery. Swedish designer Adreas Lindholm is one of my favorite graphic artists, and him and his "metalheart" crew can come up with some great type designs and graphical constructions. Their stuff on the "Resident Evil" campaign was really cool even though the movie itself sucked. Anway, movie poster art overall could be a hell of a lot better than it is currently. Right now 99% of it is just plain boring --and very geared to the small box sizes of VHS tapes and DVD discs. A movie poster is 41" X 27". It is high time we start getting more art appropriate for that format.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001
|
posted 05-14-2002 03:08 PM
I had an opportunity to see Episdoe 2 this weeked when they were testing our DLP system. I'm not that crazy about Star Wars, but I wanted to see it a.) to be able to say I saw it a week early and b.) to see DLP in action. The movie sucked, but the presentation was phenominal.As with Episode 1, I enjoyed the story, but the movie was not very well done. One of my biggest complaints about Episdoe 1 was that kid couldn't act! But that's OK, because he's just a kid. Well I think that Hayden Christensen did just as bad a job playing the new Anakin. I thought he was absolutely phenominal in Life As a House and was thirlled to learn he would be the new Anakin. WHAT HAPPENED TO HIM? I think, though, that it wasn't so much his fault but just the way the role written. And what's up with Yodda??? Why does he need a cain to walk, but can fight with a light saber better than anyone? I cracked up when I saw that scene. It was absolutely ridiculous! And speaking of light saber scenes, why do they always have to have one at the end like that? The idea is getting old. It was just like watching the Darth Maul scene at the end of Episode 1. In many scenes, the computer effects were totally obvious! It's as if they didn't even attempt to make it look real. I can't stand that. Overall, a good story, but not a well-done movie.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 05-15-2002 01:13 PM
Saw it last night at our sister theater: I missed the first half-hour because I was looking for things to complain about, then gave up because I was annoying the people i was watching it with (Star Wars people, not film people). But, aside from the obviously CGI shots and soft, almost transparent, edges of the live-action shots against the backgrounds, I really had to look harder than i expected. I did notice a lack of texture detail, in skin tones especially: like everyone was wearing too much makeup. The muddy dark scenes only showed up once that I noticed (the padme bedroom scene). The film had one cement splice, but there was absolutely no discoloration on either side of it, the best one i've ever seen. And there was one 5 second spurt of white-speck-blizzard towards the middle. As for the movie itself: I enjoyed the engine sound efects, but wonder why the blasters still sound cheesy and lame. The city scapes were terriffic and reminded me of my favorite scenes from The 5th Element (a movie i've always wanted to see a spin-off made from set intirely in the city) and Blade Runner. ... C-3po, as much as i like his character, was annoying. I think hes the new "jar jar for episode 2". One final question though: Why on earth is EP:2 rated PG and Spiderman PG-13? I can't figure that one out as I don't believe spidey had any beheadings (vs. SW's half dozen not including droids) amputations (vs. SW's 2 or 3) blatent simulated acts of animal cruelty, etc. $$$? -Adam
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 05-16-2002 05:01 PM
05/16/2002, Regal Cinema World 8, Eugene OR, #3, 10:00AM, scope, SDDS. Attendance about 40. Presentation would get a "nearly flawless" from me except for some SDDS dropouts near the end of reel 1. Most of my technical observations are in the "How's your print look?" thread in Film Handler's Forum.I was so intent on finding flaws with the image quality that I had a tough time getting into the story until the show was about 2/3 over. I'm going to see it again and pay less attention to technical stuff and more to the story, and my opinion may change at that time. But for now: I am not a Star Wars fanatic, and I find some of the endless political dialog to be, well, boring. There must be a better way to tell that part of the story without putting some of us to sleep. I understand they're trying to flesh out those details and give it depth, but damn, I suspect some of it is flat out deadly dull to average viewers. Likewise the "courting" scenes between Anakin and Amadala. ZZZzzz. Their relationship could maybe be established just as well with less time spent on long, fawning gazes between the two and Sound Of Music-type romps through wildflower-filled meadows. The dialog is laughably bad sometimes, and there were a couple snickers from the audience (not just me either). But I guess if you view this as a highbrow version of the old Saturday matinee serials, the dialog can kind of work at that level. The action sequences really do sizzle though. They look and sound great and the detail is amazing. More action. Less standing around talking politics. So, based on 1 viewing, I give it a "C" for average moviegoers. I think most people will sense that there's something "special" about this movie, but it won't all come together enough to raise it above the "It was just OK" level. It gets a "B" for Star Wars fanatics, who will like it no matter what and the movie is better than Ep1. And the action scenes get an "A" for everyone. I also give George Lucas and company an "A" for effort, especially for advancing the state of the art of how movies can look and sound, and for bringing "Presentation Quality" to the forefront of discussion, even if not everyone (including me) agrees with everything he says and does. At least we're talking about it. 
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|