|
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Inglourious Basterds (2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted 08-22-2009 08:08 PM
^ Haha, you're such a geek monte!
Being a logical (and much improved) successor to his segment in the Grindhouse double feature, Quentin Tarantino brings his trademark exploitation schtick to the WWII genre in a movie which is apparently two and a half hours long but feels like 90mins. The result stands proudly amongst the best in his filmography in terms of dialogue, visual style, music, homage and the ever-present threat of blinding violence. And it's nice to see another picture where the art of projection features so prominently (is Cinema Paradiso the only other one?)
Christoph Waltz is fantastically insidious as über villain, Col. Hans "The Jew Hunter" Landa, nicely offsetting Brad Pitt's deliciously hammy Lt. Aldo "The Apache" Raine. In many ways, the two characters are very much alike in the way they toy with their prisoners and in their propensity for a letting a victim go so that they might spread the fear for their captors. The only thing which makes Raine less evil than Waltz is the fact that he's on our side! That and Pitt's performance is plainly hilarious. Raine, in the guise of an Italian stunt man, blurting out Eye-talian interjections ("bon jorno", "grattzy", "a river dertchy" etc) in his thick southern hillbilly accent represents one of the more uproarious moments in the movie. Great stuff!
Diane Kruger continues to impress as the charming, psuedo-Dietrich double agent, Bridget von Hammersmark. Like Pitt, her acting talents trump her not insignificant good looks. Not so Eli Roth, however, whose dark handsomeness easily outshines his limited acting abilities; a point not lost on Tarantino who wisely keeps his lines to a minimum. Not that it matters, Roth's dodgy thespian skills further add to the films exploitation cred. Similarly, German cinematic favourite, Til Schweiger, clearly does not speak much English. Given very few lines by QT, Schweiger makes the most of his limited part but he is, frankly, a little wasted in the role of Gestapo killer, Hugo Stiglitz. Mélanie Laurent conspicuously stands out as the only major player delivering a subtle, beguiling performance and represents the heart of the film as displaced Jewish orphan, Shosanna Dreyfus.
Inglourious Basterds probably won't be the best film of the year but it is solid Tarantino and that's enough.
8.5 out of 10.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 08-22-2009 11:23 PM
CINEMA: 13th Avenue Warren, Wichita, KS AUDITORIUM: 14 (from the balcony) PRESENTATION: 35mm/Dolby Digital/THX PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None RATING: Three stars (out of four)
quote: Stu Jamieson And it's nice to see another picture where the art of projection features so prominently (is Cinema Paradiso the only other one?)
"Targets", Peter Bogdanovich's debut film, features some great 1960's projectionist footage at Pacific's Reseda Drive-In...starring their actual projectionist. The footage includes a changeover before the poor guy gets killed.
THE PLOT: Killing Nazis. Wackiness ensues.
I caught up on Enzo Castellari's 1978 low-rent Italian-made Quel maledetto treno blindato ("The Inglorious Bastards"). One of the extras is a conversation between Castellari and Tarantino about the film and the "remake" (they actually called it that) Tarantino was writing at the time. While Tarantino may have lifted the title and thrown some nuggets into the character names (specifically the fake names of the "Italian film makers" in the cinema), these movies have nothing to do with each other.
The original was about a group of escaped American military prisoners who accidentally kill everybody in a specially trained unit sent on a secret mission that they end up taking on themselves. The Blu-ray release is a great example of how good a cheap old film can look in high def.
The new one is a completely ridiculous tribute to similar movies...cheap war exploitation flicks. Everything is trademark Tarantino. Well shot, good action, and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of dialogue. It's absurdly long, but you hardly notice the time go by.
It won't be my favorite Tarantino flick by a long shot, but the guy has yet to make a movie I didn't like.
Excellent use of the old "Universal" logo.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|