|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Pepsi Policy Trailers
|
Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 03-29-2001 11:54 PM
I read the last part of your post Evans and it seems to me that if there is invariably another trailer after the "Pepsi Girl" spot, it is, presumably, an attached trailer, which are not to be removed from the print. If I'm not mistaken, it is also taboo to remove & move them (in order to put the "paid" spot on just prior to the feature). In my opinion, paid trailers, while a great source of revenue for a company, should be kept OFF screen. People, for the most part, are bombarded with the same ads thru other media sources. They simply do not need the theatre industry to push them as well...Or so I think.. ------------------ The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris Duvall
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 03-30-2001 05:21 AM
To clarify on the Regal policy on the order of trailers...1. Rolling Stock ads (commercials)  2. Trailers (including attached ones) 3. Sound promos (THX, DOLBY, DTS etc.) 4. Policy 5. Feature If there are Regal locations out there not following this...shame, shame  Brad is right, there should be some pride in the presentaion. There seems to be some laziness out there and it is very unfortunate. Evans...ahmen on the masking thing. I cannot stand it when a location does not have it. BTW, was it a Regal build or was it one of the ones we aquired during our Borg years? I have a hard time believing that we built a location without masking. Ahh! The horror, the horror! Back to the Pepsi girl thing...her contract with Pepsi does expire 03/30/01 and from what I know, it was not picked up again. If we were to continue playing these trailers, Pepsi would be liable to pay that girl, which seems they don't want to. Could be wrong here, but that is what it looks like. Yes, we did get some complaints about the damn thing (mainly staff), but not enough to warrant it being yanked. I have never heard of any theatres being picketed over it. Seems kinda silly to me. We are expecting new Policy trailers in the next few weeks. ------------------ Chris Duvall General Manager Regal Cinemas Colonnade 14 Las Vegas, Nevada
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-30-2001 09:53 AM
Chris, It was Cobb, not Regal, that built the theatres without masking in two thirds of the auditoriums. These theatres were assimilated into Regal's collection on August 1, 1997.About the subject of policy trailers: when a policy trailer is designed, it should be shown many times to a rather large group of people to get reactions. The group should have to see it at least once per day over a period of 7 days to determine if it is something that people will get tired of. It is easy to make such a trailer that people will love and prefer on the first viewing, but that will become despised on the 10th viewing. It is safer to go with something that doesn't get as big of a first response, but that does not become an irritation after several viewings. Regal's "train" or "roller coaster" (whatever it was) never really impressed me, but I liked it because there was nothing about it to get tired of and it had several characteristics that made it easy for me, as a customer and reviewer, to check the framing on flat films to determine if excessive cropping at the top and bottom of the image was occurring. Sometimes when that thing would play at Hollywood 18, if a group of kids from Grissom High School were in the auditorium, they'd hold their arms up as if they were riding on a roller coaster.  I hope the next policy trailer puts more emphasis on asking people to turn off their cell phones. There is usually at least one cell phone slut in every movie I attend. Evans A Criswell Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Info Site
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doug Willming
Film Handler
Posts: 45
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 04-02-2001 10:54 AM
The Pepsi Girl trailer was filmed only for Regal. It was shot on film in Hollywood, but edited on video, then bumped back to film in flat and scope versions. The total running time was 2 minutes, 5 secs. Our company was in production on a trailer for Regal (actually, it was finished) when they made the decision to let Pepsi and their ad agency come up with a trailer featuring the Pepsi Girl. I would imagine the reasons were $. Our company is currently in litigation with Regal. Almost all of our custom trailers for major circuits have been digital sound for the last 10 years. Most of our trailers run no longer than 60 seconds, which I think is about tops for a piece of film you're asking an audience to watch over and over again for a period of possibly years. Our trailers are always animated, whether cartoon (Cinemark Front Row Joe) or computer graphics (Carmike). I think live action trailers wear out their welcome fast. I am always amused by circuit owners that have run the same trailer for 5 years or more that brag about the audience responding in some way (raising their hands during the rollercoaster, clapping along with the trailer, mimicing the dialogue)to their trailer. I think most of these people are just so bored of seeing the same thing everytime they go to a movie they're making fun of the situation. ------------------
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|