Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Regal swallows up UA and Edwards? WTF? (Page 5)

 
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
Author Topic: Regal swallows up UA and Edwards? WTF?
Mike Williams
Master Film Handler

Posts: 255
From: Knoxville, TN
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-19-2002 02:41 PM      Profile for Mike Williams   Email Mike Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From what I can tell, the aspect ratio is the same as TV in the auditoriums. I know that it is all driven by a server installed on every individual screen. They also put plasma screens in the lobby that run off of a server. It is all handled by Regal CineMedia in Colorado (formerly the UA office).

The preshow that is shown in the theaters is a combination of MPEG videos of commercials/music videos and powerpoint style slides.

From what I have seen, the lobby show only has had the videos and commercials. (AND Trailers) They are widescreen.


 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-20-2002 05:11 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh god, now we have VIDEO commercials to look forward to instead of slides!?!? I bet some good old fashioned TRAILERS would look great on those widescreen plasma lobby displays. What is this world coming to? Maybe I should think twice about applying to any of Regal's Borg ships. I would go nuts there.

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-29-2002 12:34 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just noticed in the paper today unter the Movie Times section that the local Regals have now added the word "stadium" to their theaters. I.E. the "Regal Waterford Lakes 20" is now "Regal Waterford Lakes Stadium 20"

I could be wrong, but was this originally a UA practice? I don't recall Regal ever calling any of their theaters "stadium" even if they were, but UA's on the other hand did.

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-29-2002 08:56 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You would think that some clever marketing director would realize that the word "stadium" does not necessarily connotate anything particularly positive. It is reminiscent sports arean seating where you sat on hardwood boards. There is nothing that hints of comfort or elegance in the word stadium. Seems at least some chain would do well being the first to call it something more appealing.... "Comfort Rocker Seats with our exclusive Direct Line Viewing." Sure sounds better than stadium seating.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 08-29-2002 10:56 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think most people these days, especially frequent movie goers, know that by nature, "stadium" conveys more comfort when applied to the context of a movie theater. I would choose a theater that said "stadium" in the ad vs. one that did not.

------------------
This one time, at Projection Camp, I stuck a xenon bulb....

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-30-2002 12:20 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although I prefer raked floor seating, I've heard lots of people say that they prefer stadium seating. But that's only in markets where there were still some flat floors, or the memories of them. After the building boom, all that hasn't been shut in most medium markets I've seen around are only stadium multiplexes.

I think it was a combination of things that caused them to prefer stadium seating: some of the flat floor theaters were older, nastier, bad spacing between seats, broken seats, etc. I think another reason a lot of people like stadium seating is also that it is more "socially isolating" - when people stand or move it's not as much in your face, & even the people who are seated near you don't seem to be so immediate. There's less of that "part of a crowd in the auditorium" feeling.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 08-30-2002 12:37 AM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Edwards always used STADIUM in the name of their stadium theatres. maybe that's a carry-over to the new chain.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-31-2002 11:57 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yah, I agree, "stadium" has come to be understood by the genral public as meaning seating were you have no obstruction in front of you....it use to be the Louge in the days of movie palaces -- and you paid a premium for sitting there. I just think that at the time they first started designing this type of theatre, someone would have come up with something better in terms of advertising punch. Again, it just shows this long-term indifference exhibition has had in hyping their own product, which, many are still shocked to hear, is NOT the picture on the screen -- THAT'S the studio's product. The exhibitor's product is the environment in which that movie is shown. You hardly ever hear a theatre bragging about its projection or sound qualty, or its presentation in general, or patron comfort or what is unique about their operation that makes them more attractive than their competitors.

Especially now with mass marketing of movies, all opening everywhere at the same time, even in theatres on the same street, you would think theatre management would be fighting tooth and nail to pamper patrons and try to lure them to see a film in THERE theatre as opposed to the competition's across the street. In every other business this is a given....two bars in the same neighborhood, both doing ok business, bar #1 decides to lower prices and add dancing girls -- half the patrons from bar #2 is now in bar #1. Simple. Why can't theatre owners see this? I mean, it's not like they are not spending money on improving their plants -- some new multiplexs that have been built recently are quite comfrotable, pleasant environments. But you are not told about that in any ads or even in the theatre proper. Makes no sense.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-02-2002 01:52 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I noticed today that yet another UA theater has changed hands around my town in South Florida. Is UA (or rather UA theaters under Regal Ent.) pulling out of Florida like GCC did?

We used to have:
UA Wellington Marketplace 8. (Closed 2000, reopened as an independent)
UA Riverbridge 8. (Closed, stripped, sold to BMC and reopened in 2002)
UA Promenade Plaza. (Changed hands to BMC recently.)
UA Okee Square. (Changed hands to BMC most recently.)

BMC also bought the old GCC 6 in Palm Beach Gardens a couple years ago. They're doing well despite being a few miles from a Regal 18 and a Crown 16/IMAX.

The only UA-branded theater remaining in the area is the UA Boynton Beach 9, but it looks like it's on its last legs. (they're playing stuff like Ya-Ya Sisterhood, Full Frontal, and Tadpole) No doubt Regal is trying to kill this one off because there's a Regal-branded theater literally walking distance away. It won't be missed if it does in fact close. 2:1 screens, no masking curtains, wide center aisles, and horrible (mono?) sound.

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 09-02-2002 04:22 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Who is BMC?
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Williams
Master Film Handler

Posts: 255
From: Knoxville, TN
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-02-2002 05:19 PM      Profile for Mike Williams   Email Mike Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are still plenty of UA's in Florida that do well. I doubt those are going anywhere.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.