Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Stupid floor staff... (Page 4)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Stupid floor staff...
Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 11-28-2008 01:20 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The thing is, those items (aside from the stuff for days when movies/times change) should take all of a couple minutes tops (unless organizing a closet takes a long time, in which case the employee and you should be miffed that no one else does their job).

And if a person is attentive AND reading a book, a conversation can be struck up about the particular book/topic.

Further, if you feel that most people are inattentive in general unless they're trained properly, don't you think the books in the box office aren't the problem? If an inattentive jerk has his book removed, he/she is still an inattentive jerk. Just because they don't have a book doesn't mean they are organizing things like they should.

In short: taking away a book doesn't make someone trained properly.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 12-15-2008 02:14 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Chris Slycord
In short: taking away a book doesn't make someone trained properly.
I agree.

And I realize I sound really draconian sometimes.

The fact is, if I let someone do their homework or read Newsweek I still have to field the griping from the ones that don't see why they can't read Maxim or GraffitiWritingSkatePunk Weekly or whatever.
It's a battle I've grown tired of having.

Not to mention in a competitive market it detracts from the sharp presentation when the cashier has to stop what he/she is doing to help the customer.

And once again you have a non-engaged appearance from your first staff impression -- alluring to would-be robbers.

In a smaller operation it can work, no doubt. And I don't expect someone to stand at attention during a 2 hour break between sets.

I do see, understand, and to a point agree with you, Chris.

I'm just saying what I've experienced. And that is simply this is the inch before the mile so to speak.

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 12-15-2008 03:04 PM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Every theatre is different. I certainly am not advocating letting box staff read books everywhere as some sort of right. If the situation was such that it would be reasonable (in my view) to not allow it, I would in a heartbeat. As I said, we don't pay them to read books.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 12-17-2008 06:32 PM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Another reason to keep books and magazines away is that employees that are skimming can stick their take in a book/magazine and walk off with the rationalization that "If I get caught, I can tell them the $20-bill must've blown in there from the box office window." It makes little to no sense, but it makes a dishonest cashier feel better because they didn't just take it and stick it in their pocket.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 12-17-2008 06:48 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If they're willing to do that they're willing to steal period. Plus, a set of security cameras can help with that.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 12-18-2008 06:39 PM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with the cameras, but sometimes owners can't afford the $3-$4000 it takes to do it.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-18-2008 10:46 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott D. Neff
I agree with the cameras, but sometimes owners can't afford the $3-$4000 it takes to do it.
Wow...you need to get another quotation. [Eek!]

You don't need 10 cameras...just one pointed in the appropriate direction will make them think twice.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 12-19-2008 09:21 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heck, if the workers are "kept in the dark" the camera wouldn't even have to work to be effective. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 12-19-2008 10:48 AM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been known to use the cameras to track down employees who don't properly redeem gift certificates or otherwise fail to do their job. I find that every now and then the staff needs a reminder that they are on camera.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 12-19-2008 10:56 AM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know about you guys, but are you sitting in front of a monitor watching your cameras all day? Or are you swapping video tapes each day before you start? A DVR+6 cameras is about $6000.

And the minute somebody steals from underneath the watchful eye of a dummy camera is the minute EVERYBODY finds out about how the camera doesn't work, or if it does, nobody ever checks it.

Cameras are only a deterrent up to a certain point, after that they need to be used as a tool to figure out why the numbers went screwy. For that you need good quality cameras positioned so you can see what the cashier is doing to their computer, as well as cross shots to see what's happening around them. And there's no point in having a camera on your Box Office cashier if you don't have one on your ticket taker. And since you don't make your money in the Box Office, you'd be stupid not to have some on your snack bar cashiers. You can't very well just put ONE camera out on the entire snack bar, you'll never see anything useful. Believe me, I've used a camera system that had one camera aimed at the snack bar and it did NOTHING.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Gorka
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 174
From: High Wycombe, England
Registered: Apr 2006


 - posted 12-19-2008 03:14 PM      Profile for Justin Gorka   Email Justin Gorka   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tell me the picture's out of rack when the slide show's on. Tell me there's somthing wrong with the sound when the show doesn't start for an hour, aske me to fix the bloody popper (which I ocasionaly do just before the engineer arives just to showhim how shit he is). Deaf loop isn't working....we have IR! I could go on all week!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.